Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored by: |
Exactech |
---|---|
Information provided by: | Exactech |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00254852 |
The purpose of this study is to compare Optecure™ as an autograft extender (treatment) to autograft alone (control) in patients undergoing 1 or 2 level fusion of the lumbar spine(one level is defined as two adjacent vertebrae), L2 and below.
The primary endpoint will be the assessment of fusion by evaluation of x-rays taken following surgery at each visit. The x-ray evaluation will be conducted by a radiologist who is blinded to the type of treatment each patient has received.
Subjects will be seen at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperative (post-op).
Questionnaires and x-rays will be completed at each visit and a computed tomography (CT) scan will be taken at the 12 month visit.
Condition | Intervention |
---|---|
Stenosis Spondylolisthesis Degenerative Disc Disease |
Procedure: Posterior Lateral Fusion (PLF) Procedure: Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) Procedure: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) Procedure: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) Procedure: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | A Single Blind, Multi-Center, Randomized, Prospective Clinical Study Comparing Optecure™ Autograft Extender to Autograft Only in Fusion of the Lumbar Spine |
Enrollment: | 94 |
Study Start Date: | October 2005 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | January 2010 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date: | January 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Arms | Assigned Interventions |
---|---|
O: Active Comparator
This treatment arm includes autograft harvested from local bone or the iliac crest, supplemented with a demineralized bone matrix (DBM) autograft extender, Optecure.
|
Procedure: Posterior Lateral Fusion (PLF)
Posterior lateral fusion (PLF) of the lumbar spine
Procedure: Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)
Procedure: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
Procedure: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)
Procedure: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF)
Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF)
|
A: Active Comparator
This treatment arm includes autograft harvested from local bone or the iliac crest.
|
Procedure: Posterior Lateral Fusion (PLF)
Posterior lateral fusion (PLF) of the lumbar spine
Procedure: Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)
Procedure: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
Procedure: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)
Procedure: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF)
Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF)
|
Autograft (graft of bone taken from one part of the body and placed in another site on the same individual) has long been considered the gold standard for lumbar spine fusion procedures. Unfortunately, there are complications involved with autograft harvest such as donor site morbidity, increased operating time, and limited supply. Therefore, the use of allograft (graft of bone taken from one body and placed into another individual) as a graft extender has become an acceptable practice, especially in fusions of more than one level where larger quantities of graft material are needed.
In this study, comparisons will be made between patients who are randomized to having fusion with an allograft material (Optecure, Exactech, Inc.) mixed with an autograft to those patients who are randomized to having fusion with autograft alone.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years and older |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
completion of questionnaires, functional performance tests, and radiographs/CT scan
Exclusion Criteria:
United States, California | |
University of California, San Diego | |
San Diego, California, United States, 92103 | |
Memorial Orthopaedic Surgical Group | |
Long Beach, California, United States, 90806 | |
United States, New York | |
State University of New York, Upstate Medical University | |
Syracuse, New York, United States, 13202 | |
Slocum Dickson Medical Group | |
New Hartford, New York, United States, 13413 | |
United States, Tennessee | |
NeuroSpine Solutions, P.C. | |
Bristol, Tennessee, United States, 37620 | |
United States, Washington | |
Madigan Army Medical Center | |
Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98431 |
Principal Investigator: | Amir Fayyazi, MD | VSAS Orthopedics |
Responsible Party: | Exactech, Inc. ( Matt Christensen ) |
Study ID Numbers: | CR04-004 |
Study First Received: | November 15, 2005 |
Last Updated: | September 15, 2008 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00254852 History of Changes |
Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board; United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Primary lumbar fusion Demineralized Bone Matrix DBM Optecure Allograft Autograft |
Lumbar fusion Interbody fusion Instrumented fusion Non-instrumented fusion Exactech Spinal fusion |
Spinal Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Constriction, Pathologic Spondylolisthesis Bone Diseases |
Spinal Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Spondylolisthesis Bone Diseases |