Congressman Scott Garrett Proudly Serving the 5th District Of New Jersey

Newsletter

Letter to Sec. Napolitano


Related Documents

04/22/09 Letter to Secretary Napolitano
 
Share This Page
Slashdot
Del.icio.us
Google
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Furl
Yahoo
Facebook
 

Washington, Apr 28 - As you know, the Department of Homeland Security recently released a report with regards to right-wing extremism.  While no one can deny there are extremists from all walks of life who use hatred and anger to further their ends, the report improperly infringed upon the first amendment rights of every citizen.  As detailed in the Associated Press, the report was issued over the concerns and objections of civil liberties officials within the Department of Homeland Security. 

Yet, the most troubling aspect of the report is by far the "Disgruntled Veterans" section.  Whether you label it as an assessment or an accusation, it was an unfair and improper characterization of our returning soldiers from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Below is the letter that I signed to Secretary Napolitano last week, expressing my anger over the classification of veterans as extremists:

Honorable Janet Napolitano:

Recently the Department of Homeland Security released a report with regards to “Rightwing Extremism.”  The report labeled many commonly held views as “radical,” such as opposition to illegal immigration, the belief in the right of the State to conduct its own affairs, and the fear of communist regimes. The labeling of these views as a threat to the State is something not done in this country since the Alien and Sedition Acts. We find this highly offensive.

The highly politicized document engages in selective perception and a bias in favor of only those events which confirm the prejudices of its authors.  Most troubling, however, are the contents of the “Disgruntled Veterans” section.

It is astonishing to us that this administration would label the men and women who have served this country so ably in Iraq and Afghanistan as possible terrorists.  The lumping of these members of the Armed Forces in with mad-men like Timothy McVeigh is not only morally reproachable, but intellectually disingenuous.  Such use of selective information is unbefitting of your department and the office you serve.  

Indeed, the incarceration rate for military personnel and returning veterans is lower than that of the general population.  In 2004, the incarceration rate was 486 per 100,000 for the general population versus 153 per 100,000 for military personnel.  By age, the incarceration rate was 1% lower for veterans versus nonveterans in the 18-24 demographic, and 45% lower in the 25-34 demographic.  Substituting the anecdotal evidence of the report for actual statistical data shows that a member of the military is less likely to commit a crime.

We are requesting a clarification of this matter and we await your response.  In particular, we hope to hear how your department came to these conclusions, the process followed for producing this report, and what data was used as the basis for this report.

Sincerely,

Scott Garrett
Member of Congress

Print version of this document