WPC 2%B ZgCourierCourier BoldCourier ObliqueApple LaserWriter IINTAPLASIIN.PRS&d H@<hhhh|X@#|d2XX[Tr5dddd6X@K@s4dddd `Kr5dddd6Nh[KHbbbbbbppK:K:K:K:fmz:z:z:z:z:pppp\\QQQtUtUtUtUzGzGzGpppp########################################HJ s4    ORDER LIST MONDAY, JUNE 19, 1995 CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION 93-676 CARPENTER, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces for  r5  further consideration in light of Ryder v. United  r5  States, 515 U. S.   (1995). 93-966 CLARK, THOMAS V. UNITED STATES The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces for  r5  further consideration in light of Ryder v. United  r5  States, 515 U. S.   (1995). 94-48 KING FISHER MARINE SERVICE V. PEREZ, ROGELIO, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for  r5q  further consideration in light of Gutierrez de Martinez  r5  v. Lamagno, 515 U. S.   (1995). 94-434 MISSOURI, ET AL. V. JENKINS, KALIMA, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U. S. ------ (1995). 94-886 JACKSON, MICHAEL, ET AL. V. WASH. CULINARY SCH., ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of'0*((Ԍ Columbia Circuit for further consideration in light of  r5N  Wilton v. Seven Falls Company, 515 U. S.   (1995). 94-944 CIR V. SCHMITZ, JOHN, ET UX. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for  r5  further consideration in light of Commissioner of  r5"  Internal Revenue v. Schleier, 515 U. S.   (1995). 94-1045 DIR., OWCP, DEPT. OF LABOR V. RAMBO, JOHN, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for  r5  further consideration in light of Metropolitan Stevedore  r5  Company v. Rambo, 515 U. S.   (1995).  s4  ORDERS IN PENDING CASES No.   HELEN FONVILLE BESS V. HENRY CISNEROS, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari outoftime is denied. D-1485 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RICHARD MARK JACOBS It having been reported to the Court that Richard Mark Jacobs, of Little Rock, Arkansas, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Missouri and this Court by order of December 12, 1994, having suspended the said Richard Mark Jacobs from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued '0*((Ԍ and served upon the respondent and that a response has been filed; It is ordered that the said Richard Mark Jacobs be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1527 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WALTER EUGENE HERKENHOFF It having been reported to the Court that Walter Eugene Herkenhoff, of Las Cruces, New Mexico, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New Mexico and this Court by order of April 17, 1995, having suspended the said Walter Eugene Herkenhoff from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that a response has been filed; It is ordered that the said Walter Eugene Herkenhoff be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1529 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PETER B. SPIVAK It having been reported to the Court that Peter B. Spivak, of Detroit, Michigan, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Michigan and this Court by order of April 17, 1995, having suspended the said Peter B. Spivak from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; '0*((Ԍ And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Peter B. Spivak be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1536 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STANLEY R. STERN It having been reported to the Court that Stanley R. Stern, of New York, New York, has resigned from the practice of law before the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this Court by order of April 17, 1995, having suspended the said Stanley R. Stern from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Stanley R. Stern be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1538 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JENNY M. MAIOLO It having been reported to the Court that Jenny M. Maiolo, of Richmond Hill, New York, has resigned from the practice of law before the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Dept., and this Court by order of April 17, 1995, having suspended the said Jenny M. Maiolo from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring her '0*((Ԍ to show cause why she should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Jenny M. Maiolo be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1541 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALAN R. BELL It having been reported to the Court that Alan R. Bell, of Fort Lee, New Jersey, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and this Court by order of April 24, 1995, having suspended the said Alan R. Bell from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Alan R. Bell be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1543 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES K. YOUNG It having been reported to the Court that James K. Young, of Bloomingdale, Illinois, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Illinois and this Court by order of April 24, 1995, having suspended the said James K. Young from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be '0*((Ԍ disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said James K. Young be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1545 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DOMINIC JOSEPH POTTS It having been reported to the Court that Dominic Joseph Potts, of Steubenville, Ohio, has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Ohio and this Court by order of May 15, 1995, having suspended the said Dominic Joseph Potts from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that a response has been filed; It is ordered that the said Dominic Joseph Potts be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1558 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MORTON CHARLES ROSENGARDEN It is ordered that Morton Charles Rosengarden, of Deerfield, Illinois, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1559 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF TED HENRY CREWELL '0*((Ԍ It is ordered that Ted Henry Crewell, of Dallas, Texas, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1560 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EDWARD VINCENT WASHINGTON, JR It is ordered that Edward Vincent Washington, Jr., of Montclair, California, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. 94-8951 WILKINSON, VERNON C. V. MISSOURI The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 10, 1995, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.  s4  CERTIORARI GRANTED 94-1592 BHD. LOCOMOTIVE, ETC., ET AL V. ATCHISON, TOPEKA, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. 94-1809 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC, ET AL. V. EPSTEIN, LAWRENCE, ET AL. The motion of Business Roundtable for leave to file  r5P  a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. 94-9088 NEAL, MEIRL G. V. UNITED STATES  r5$  The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in  r5%  forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. '0*((Ԍ  s4  CERTIORARI DENIED 94-693 HERNANDEZ, RAY V. TX ST. BD. DENTAL, ET AL. 94-999 DOWNEY, BURNS, ET UX. V. CIR 94-1041 HAWKINS, JACK, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES 94-1339 MALTBY, KERRY V. WINSTON, MARY, ET AL. 94-1407 PENNSYLVANIA V. BULL, RONALD 94-1417 WOODALL, JOYCE V. RENO, ATTY. GEN., ET AL. 94-1482 CLOUSER, LEROY, ET AL. V. GLICKMAN, SEC. OF AG., ET AL. 94-1533 FLOYD, DEBORAH V. COLLIN COM. COLLEGE, ET AL. 94-1541 BEY, JOHN, ET AL. V. BISBEE, KENNETH 94-1558 EEOC V. FRANCIS W. PARKER SCHOOL 94-1579 COLLINS, CHARLES V. DUGGAN, W. DENNIS 94-1581 REGIONS BANK, ETC. ET AL. V. IRS 94-1605 MITCHELL, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES 94-1611 HAITIAN REFUGEE CENTER V. CHRISTOPHER, SEC. OF STATE 94-1668 RAHN, ROSEMARY V. DRAKE CENTER, INC. 94-1709 THOMAS, TYRONE V. BAXTER, MARIE 94-1717 GREER, MARIAN, ET UX. V. LANDMARK BANCSHARES, ET AL. 94-1725 CRANE CO. V. U.S. EX REL. RABUSHKA, ET AL. 94-1729 O'QUINN, JOHN V. KLINE, DONNA 94-1731 ROWLAND, GOV. OF CT, ET AL. V. JUAN F., ET AL. 94-1736 TODD, JASON, ET AL. V. FLORIDA 94-1737 K. R. B. vs. STEPHENSON, JAY, ET AL. 94-1739 NATL. PAINT & COATING, ET AL V. CHICAGO, IL 94-1742 OSBORNE, JENNINGS, ET UX. V. POWER, ARLETA, ET AL. 94-1751 WILLIAMS, JESSIE V. CAPPS TRAILER SALES, ET AL. 94-1752 GARRETT, SHEILA, ET AL. V. GILLESS, A. C., ET AL. 94-1755 KOUPAL, BRETT V. SIOUX FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT 94-1757 KLEENWELL BIOHAZARD, ETC. V. NELSON, SHARON, ETC., ET AL. 94-1759 ELLINGTON, JOY, ET AL. V. LA CTY. SUPERIOR CT., ET AL. '0*((Ԍ 94-1762 MORETTI, SALVATORE V. DINICE, LOUIS, ET AL. 94-1765 INN OF MIAMI AIRPORT, INC. V. PERREN-VIBES MUSIC, ET AL. 94-1766 MICHIGAN V. HENSICK, TIMOTHY LEE 94-1767 SULLIVAN, JOHN, ET UX. V. MEMPHIS, TN 94-1768 CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORP. V. UNITED STATES 94-1769 MURPHY, JOHN V. UNITED STATES 94-1774 LESLIE, ROBERT V. LONG BEACH PROSECUTOR, ET AL. 94-1775 CAVER, HELEN V. GERACE, JOE, ETC., ET AL. 94-1777 BALL, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. GASHO, JOHN, ET UX. 94-1781 ATTORNEY R. V. MISSISSIPPI BAR 94-1782 WISTON XXIV LTD. PARTNERSHIP V. BALCOR PENSION INVESTORS V 94-1783 SCARIANO, ANTHONY V. JUSTICES, SUPREME CT OF IN 94-1784 AMATO, ROBERT V. LA COMMR. SECURITIES, ET AL. 94-1792 UNIFIED SCH. DIST. # 244 V. KANSAS, ET AL. 94-1794 DAVIS, DIANA, ETC., ET AL V. FICANO, ROBERT, ETC., ET AL. 94-1795 YARDARM RESTAURANT, INC. V. POMPANO BEACH, FL 94-1798 HOME OF FAITH, ETC., ET AL. V. CIR 94-1805 NEW ORLEANS, LA, ET AL. V. LA DEBATING, ETC., ET AL. 94-1814 BURNS, CATHY V. REED, RICK 94-1834 ALPER, HARVEY, ET AL. V. FLORIDA BAR 94-1852 ALLEY, DOYLE V. GE CAPITAL CORP. 94-1899 PEREZ-AGUILERA, ERASMO V. UNITED STATES 94-6703 KIMBRO, MARILYN A. V. VELTEN, DOLORES, ET AL. 94-7239 HENDERSON, ANDRE T. V. BAIRD, DAVID, ET AL. 94-7412 MODDON, WILLIE M. V. TEXAS 94-8010 BROXTON, EUGENE ALVIN V. TEXAS 94-8131 LEDBETTER, RUSSELL V. EDWARDS, WARDEN 94-8179 GILLESPIE, DARRYL V. UNITED STATES 94-8507 ) OUTTEN, JACK FOSTER V. DELAWARE ) 94-8512 ) SHELTON, STEVEN V. DELAWARE 94-8566 WILLIS, KATHY E. V. UNITED STATES ' 0*((Ԍ 94-8853 QUESINBERRY, GEORGE ADRIAN V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC 94-8888 SCOTT, PAUL WILLIAM V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL 94-8935 CARRILLO, EDUARDO, ET AL. V. ILLINOIS 94-8939 JEROME, JOSEPH A. V. BIDDERS INC. 94-8941 ALEXANDER, ELIJAH ALFRED V. JOHNSON, JOSEPH, ET AL. 94-8948 ORIAKHI, FELIX V. WEST, BRYANT, ET AL. 94-8953 WOODALL, J. C. vs. HILL, SHERIFF, ET AL. 94-8954 VOHRA, DEEPAK V. CA WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD 94-8958 SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. INTERPOL, ET AL. 94-8959 SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INT'L. 94-8962 STUART, CLYDE WAYNE V. SCOTT, DIR., TX DCJ 94-8964 PAGE, TERRY O'CONNOR V. ANGELONE, VA DOC 94-8968 WEINSTEIN, BARRY V. WEINSTEIN, GAIL E. 94-8970 CALHOUN, ROBERT H. S. V. WASHINGTON 94-8971 HOMO, LAWRENCE R. V. HENNIKER 94-8973 CAO, THINH VAN V. MASSACHUSETTS 94-8975 PIETRI, NORBERTO V. FLORIDA 94-8978 WOOD, JOSEPH R. V. ARIZONA 94-8986 ROGERS, KENNETH V. CUYSON, NENITA, ET AL. 94-8987 SMITH, RODNEY WAYNE V. CARROLL, THOMAS, ET AL. 94-8991 MINCEY, MITCHELL T. V. THOMAS, WARDEN 94-8992 JONES, HARRY V. FLORIDA 94-8993 NOEL, DEFRANTZE L. V. WHITE, STEVE, ET AL. 94-8994 MELINIE, VAN V. CAIN, WARDEN, ET AL. 94-8995 BREWER, WILLIE LEE V. VOINOVICH, GOV. OF OH, ET AL. 94-8998 VIGES, JOHN L. V. SCOTT, DIR., TX DCJ 94-8999 BRIGAERTS, R. G. vs. GOMEZ, DIR., CA DOC, ET AL. 94-9003 WILSON, LORENZO M. V. CIRCUIT COURT OF AL 94-9016 McDONALD, MAURICE J. V. LUCHIRINI, ROBERT, ET AL. 94-9024 GERMANY, DENNIS C. V. ZAVARAS, EXEC. DIR., CO DOC 94-9027 DE LA ROSA, JOSE V. SCULLY, SUPT., GREEN HAVEN ' 0*((Ԍ 94-9028 HERBST, COLIN J. V. SCOTT, DIR., TX DCJ 94-9029 CLARK, A. D. vs. O'SULLIVAN, WARDEN, ET AL. 94-9030 ARNOLD, KEITHIAN L. V. BOATMEN'S TRUST COMPANY 94-9031 BETHEA, ANTHONY CRAIG V. ABRAMAJTYS, WARDEN 94-9049 FONTAN, CHARLES V. IEYOUB, ATTY. GEN. LA 94-9052 FOTTLER, FRED L. V. AINSWORTH, GARY L., ET AL. 94-9053 HABURN, JAMES D., ET AL. V. USDC ED NC 94-9063 MORGAN, WALTER D. V. MacDONALD, F. T., ET AL. 94-9075 SPENCER, EUGENE V. SCOTT, DIR., TX DCJ 94-9113 HENRY, JOHN R. V. FLORIDA 94-9136 BOYDEN, GERALD GLEN V. RUBIN, BARRY, ET AL. 94-9147 ROMERO, MICHAEL V. TANSY, WARDEN, ET AL. 94-9179 RATTLER, CLYDE V. OPM 94-9190 FREEMAN, FRED H. V. CALIFORNIA 94-9192 GREEN, DAVID L. V. SCOTT, DIR., TX DCJ 94-9194 HARBIN, ROBERT W. V. MD MOTOR VEHICLE ADMIN. 94-9196 GALVAN, CINDY L. V. CAROTHERS, SUPT., ET AL. 94-9202 BURNS, DEBORAH B. V. UNITED STATES 94-9208 BATTIE, FRED V. UNITED STATES 94-9226 SARGENT, WAYNE V. UNITED STATES 94-9235 MARK, GLEN V. UNITED STATES 94-9236 ROSARIO, GREGORIO V. UNITED STATES 94-9241 SPENCER, DARRELL V. UNITED STATES 94-9244 CHRISTIE, CLIFFORD DENNIS V. UNITED STATES 94-9248 JAMERSON, RONNIE N. V. UNITED STATES 94-9249 JONES, ELLIS L. V. UNITED STATES 94-9251 SABINI, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES 94-9252 SEGUAME, ESTEVAN CARRERA V. UNITED STATES 94-9254 ROBINSON, ANTHONY TODD V. SCOTT., DIR., TX DCJ 94-9256 WEXLER, HAROLD V. UNITED STATES 94-9259 WALKER, REGINALD K. V. UNITED STATES ' 0*((Ԍ 94-9260 WILLIAMSON, CALISE D. V. UNITED STATES 94-9262 MURPHY, MARIO B. V. ANGELONE, DIR., VA DOC 94-9267 CARROLL, EDWARD P., ET UX. V. UNITED STATES 94-9268 ARROYO-ANGULO, CLIMACO V. UNITED STATES 94-9271 LUCAS, JOHN V. SWINSON, WARDEN 94-9273 LOCKETT, CARL D. V. MISSISSIPPI 94-9274 LOCKETT, CARL D. V. MISSISSIPPI 94-9280 ) MORRIS, WILLIE V. UNITED STATES ) 94-9321 ) MALONE, CHARLES B. V. UNITED STATES 94-9283 SMITH, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 94-9284 CHRISTOPHER, HERBERT V. UNITED STATES 94-9286 GARCIA-RICO, JOSE V. UNITED STATES 94-9295 FORD, ROBERT, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 94-9297 MILLER, STEPHEN S. V. UNITED STATES 94-9308 WASHINGTON, JEROME V. UNITED STATES 94-9309 VAZQUEZ, DEBBIE L. V. UNITED STATES 94-9311 BRIGHT, DAVID MILES V. MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORR. 94-9312 FRIEDMAN, LEONARD R. V. BD. OF REG. IN MEDICINE 94-9316 REAVIS, SANDRA V. UNITED STATES 94-9319 SCOTT, WAYNE, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 94-9320 McCULLOUGH, TONY V. UNITED STATES 94-9325 WEBSTER, JEFFREY S. V. UNITED STATES 94-9326 DANIELS, STEVE A. V. UNITED STATES 94-9336 MORENO-HERNANDEZ, MARIO V. UNITED STATES 94-9343 GUTIERREZ, JOSE G. V. UNITED STATES 94-9345 NIDIFFER, WILLIAM E. V. UNITED STATES 94-9346 McCLINTON, JAMES E. V. UNITED STATES 94-9348 WALDEMER, MARK V. UNITED STATES 94-9354 ADDISON, CURTIS A. V. UNITED STATES 94-9355 AFLLEJE-TORRES, BARBARA V. UNITED STATES 94-9369 BASDEN, ERNEST W. V. NORTH CAROLINA ' 0*((Ԍ The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 94-1612 MICHIGAN V. BELLEW, RODNEY 94-1786 NEW YORK V. REYES, CARMEN  r5  The motions of respondents for leave to proceed in  r58  forma pauperis are granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 94-1644 ) DOE, JOHN, ET UX. V. KIRCHNER, OTAKAR ) 94-9087 ) BABY RICHARD V. KIRCHNER, OTAKAR, ET AL. The motion of Yale University Child Study Center,  r5  et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Governor of the State of  r5Z  Illinois for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Paul Simon, et al. for leave to  r5  file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Catholic Adoptive Parents Association for leave to file  r5  a brief as amicus curiae in No. 94-9087 is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 94-1695 CARRIERE, MANSEL, ET AL. V. GREY WOLF DRILLING, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. 94-1705 BEADLE, ASTON V. TAMPA, FL, ET AL. The motion of National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs, et al. for leave to file a brief as  r5  amici curiae is granted. The motion of General Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists, et al. for leave  r5:#  to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Advocates International for leave to file a brief as  r5%  amicus curiae is granted. The motion of Agudath Israel  r5$'  of America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is ' 0*((Ԍ granted. The motion of American Jewish Congress, et al.  r5N  for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 94-1719 MountainWEST FIN. V. VISA U.S.A., INC. The motion of American Council on Consumer  r5  Awareness, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici  r5  curiae is granted. The motion of American Financial  r5"  Services Association for leave to file a brief as amicus  r5p  curiae is granted. The motion of Center for Public Interest Research, et al. for leave to file a brief as  r5  amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.  s4  MANDAMUS DENIED 94-8667 IN RE DALE SMITH The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.  s4.  PROHIBITION DENIED 94-8945 IN RE THOMAS SPYCHALA The petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.  s4f  REHEARINGS DENIED 94-1413 BAKER, REBECCA, ET AL. V. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. 94-8035 DAVIS, LEON V. FIRST WORTHING MANAGEMENT 94-8242 IN RE EURICA CALIFORRNIAA 94-8248 HILI, CHARLES V. HILI, MARY 94-8277 ETHERIDGE, CATHERINE M. V. DEPT. OF THE TREASURY 94-8294 IN RE JOHN SNAVELY 94-8299 SOLIS, ARTURO V. CIRCLE K CORP., ET AL. 94-8375 FRUSHER, CECELIA P. V. BASKIN-ROBBINS, ET AL. 94-8402 ROLAND, GEORGE V. STALDER, RICHARD, ET AL. '0*((Ԍ 94-8464 IN RE DOROTHY LITZENBERG 94-8617 IN RE GEORGE R. WILSON 94-8656 MASON, MICHAEL W., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES The petitions for rehearing are denied.  s5 - RECESS ORDER ă The Court will take a recess from Monday, June 19, 1995, until Wednesday, June 21, 1995, and from Wednesday, June 21, 1995, until Monday, June 26, 1995.  s4  MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION The written motions for admission of the following lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted: