Current

Featured Cases AddThis Feed Button

  • Columbia Pictures Industries Inc v. Bunnell
    Plaintiffs filed a complaint against defendants for copyright infringement. Plaintiffs allege that defendants knowingly enable, encourage, induce and profit from massive online piracy of plaintiffs' copyright works through the operation of their TorrentSpy website.
    California Central District Court
    Filed: February 23, 2006
    Plaintiff: Columbia Pictures Industries Inc, Disney Enterprises Inc, Paramount Pictures Corporation, Tristar Pictures Inc, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and others...; Defendant: Justin Bunnell, Forrest Parker, Wes Parker, Valence Media LLC, Does
    Last Docket Report Change Found: May 5, 2009
  • Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation
    Plaintiff Apple Inc. alleged that Defendant Psystar Corporation sold in commerce a computer named the OpenMac--subsequently changed to Open Computer--which runs a modified version of the Leopard operating system without authorization from Plaintiff and in violation of the terms of the Software License Agreement governing the use of Mac OS X software and Plaintiff's intellectual property., Defendant also provided direct copies and/or modified versions of Plaintiff's software updates.
    California Northern District Court
    Plaintiff
    Filed: July 3, 2008
    Last Docket Report Change Found: May 5, 2009
  • Joe Satriani v. Christopher Martin et al
    California Central District Court
    Copyrights
    Filed: December 4, 2008
    Plaintiff: Joe Satriani, Joe Satriani Defendant: Christopher Martin, Jonathan Buckland, Guy Berryman, William Champion, Capitol Records
    Last Docket Report Change Found: May 5, 2009
  • A.V. et al v. iParadigms, LLC
    Virginia Eastern District Court
    Copyright
    Filed: March 27, 2007
    Plaintiff: A. V., K. W., E. N., M. N. Defendant: iParadigms, LLC Counter Defendant: A. V., K. W., E. N., M. N. Counter Claimant: iParadigms, LLC
    Last Docket Report Change Found: May 4, 2009
  • Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al
    Publisher lawsuit against public university that makes electronic copies of course readings available to students without paying royalty fees.
    Georgia Northern District Court
    Copyright
    Filed: April 15, 2008
    Plaintiff: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press and others... Defendant: Carl V. Patton, Ronald Henry, Charlene Hurt, J. L. Albert
    Last Docket Report Change Found: May 3, 2009

Dockets AddThis Feed Button

  • Argus & Associates, Inc. v. Delmia Corporation et al
    Michigan Eastern District Court
    Copyrights
    Filed: May 5, 2009
    Plaintiff: Argus & Associates, Inc. Defendant: Delmia Corporation, Dassault Systemes, SA
  • UMG Recordings Inc et al v. Carroll
    Washington Western District Court
    Copyrights
    Filed: May 5, 2009
    Plaintiff: UMG Recordings Inc, UMG Recordings Inc, Arista Records LLC, Arista Records LLC, Sony Music Entertainment and others... Defendant: Laura Anne Carroll
  • UMG Recordings Inc et al v. Zoelle
    Wisconsin Eastern District Court
    Copyrights
    Filed: May 5, 2009
    Plaintiff: UMG Recordings Inc, Atlantic Recording Corporation, Sony Music Entertainment Defendant: Nicholas Michael Zoelle
  • BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. F&W, INC. et al
    Pennsylvania Western District Court
    Copyrights
    Filed: May 4, 2009
    Plaintiff: BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., ESTATE OF TYRONE G. KERSEY, STATE ONE MUSIC AMERICA LLC, ZACHARY HOLT SMITH, KEN ADAMANY and others... Defendant: F&W, INC., LOUIS J. GRIPPO
  • ChampBoat Series, LLC v. In2Focus Films, Inc. et al
    North Carolina Western District Court
    Copyrights
    Filed: May 4, 2009
    Plaintiff: ChampBoat Series, LLC Defendant: In2Focus Films, Inc., Jay Kriss

Regulations AddThis Feed Button

Copyright Office AddThis Feed Button

Copyright Law Review Articles AddThis Feed Button

Copyright News AddThis Feed Button

Copyright Blog Posts AddThis Feed Button

  • The Blacklist Backlash
    ...decision to place Canada in the top rank of worst offenders with China, Russia and Thailand. Canada has stolidly refused to ape the US government in enacting a punishing law protecting the movie and music distributors. The Digital Millennium...
    by Michael Geist's Blog
  • Microsoft Wins Big Damage Award in Copyright Case
    Howard Knopf points to a recent Federal Court case in which Microsoft was awarded $250,000 arising from copyright infringement of its software.
    by Michael Geist's Blog
  • Search Engine on the Special 301 Report
    ...301 report and the inclusion of Canada on the Priority Watch List. The show addresses many of the issues I've writing about over the past few days including the absurdity of including Canada on the Priority Watch List and the repurcussions for...
    by Michael Geist's Blog
  • Important article in p2pnet: Let us come together as a community to help Brittany Kruger defend herself from the RIAA
    /**/ Important article from Jon Newton at p2pnet.net: Help Brittany beat the RIAA: I It's time for me to put my money where my mouth is. I've been writing about the cruelty inflicted by Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony Music on the same...
    by Recording Industry vs The People
  • U.S. List Unfairly Tarnishes Canada's Digital Reputation
    ...findings. From a substantive perspective, it would be worth reminding U.S. officials that Canada is compliant with its international copyright obligations. In recent years, it responded to U.S. pressure by becoming one of the few countries to...
    by Michael Geist's Blog