[NIFL-ESL:10942] Discussion on Measuring Literacy: Performance Levels for Adults, Interim Report (2205)

From: Lynda Terrill (lterrill@cal.org)
Date: Wed Jun 15 2005 - 09:29:37 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j5FDTbG01619; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:29:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:29:37 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <300BEB3101730B459922DE1D3B4AED8901B14991@hobbes2.cal.org>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Lynda Terrill" <lterrill@cal.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:10942] Discussion on Measuring Literacy: Performance Levels for Adults, Interim Report (2205)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 3530
Lines: 103

Dear listers,

Please see the announcement below from the NIFL-Assessment moderator,
Marie Cora regarding an upcoming online discussion on performance levels
for adults.

Lynda Terrill
lterrill@cal.org 

********

To subscribe to the following discussion, go to:
http://www.nifl.gov/lincs/discussions/nifl-assessment/assessment.html
and click on Subscribe in the left toolbar (you must also unsubscribe
yourself).
 
 
Please join the NIFL-Assessment Discussion List for a conversation on
 
Measuring Literacy:  Performance Levels for Adults, Interim Report
(2005)
 
Date:  June 20 - 24
 
Principle Guests:   Judy Koenig and Stuart Elliot, Project Directors
 
The Full Committee will also be joining us as observers; their comments
and insights are welcomed.
 
Full Committee Members:
 
Chris Edley, University of California at Berkeley, School of Law Bob
Hauser, University of Wisconsin at Madison Judy Alamprese, ABT
Associates, USA Michael Delli Carpini, University of Pennsylvania Vivian
Gadsden, University of Pennsylvania Andy Hartman, Classroom Teacher,
formerly with Bell Policy Center Glynda Hull, University of California
at Berkeley Rebecca Maynard, University of Pennsylvania Lorraine
McDonnell, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC Larry Mikulecky,
Indiana University Bob Mislevy, University of Maryland Norm Peterson,
SPR Center, Minneapolis John Poggio, University of Kansas Rima Rudd,
Harvard University Mary Jane Schmitt, TERC, Cambridge, MA Heide Wrigley,
Aguirre International, CA and Washington DC Dave Thissen, University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill
 
Suggested preparations for this discussion:
 
This Interim Report can be read on-line at:
http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11267.html
 
Our discussion guests are interested in sharing their thoughts on the
Interim Report, providing clarification to the field on information
contained in the Report, and entertaining your questions and comments,
particularly in the following areas:
 
*	Questions concerning the lowest and the highest categories of
the literacy levels; specifically, questions concerning the difference
between the Non-Literacy in English and Below Basic categories, and
comparing the percentages of folks falling within these categories
between the 1992 survey and the 2003 survey;
 
*	An explanation of the Bookmark Standard-Setting Procedure that
was utilized in the study;
 
*	An explanation of the Quasi Contrasting Groups Procedure, that
was utilized to adjust the cut scores;
 
*	Why the Committee chose not to determine a level of performance
as "necessary" or "sufficient" for effectively functioning in life; as
an example of this, note that the terms used to label the levels are
purely descriptive, rather than indicating a particular judgment about
that level;
 
*	An explanation of how the Committee's process differed from the
original process for determining the levels and cut scores for the 1992
results;
 
*	The recommendations that the Committee puts forth based on its
research.
 
Please note that the Final Report is due out in the Fall of this year;
the differences between the Interim and Final Reports will be
 
*	the application of the performance levels and cut scores to the
2003 data, and 
*	the reporting of the percentages of adults in each level based
on the 2003 results.
 
Please join us!
 
marie cora
Moderator, NIFL Assessment Discussion List, and Coordinator/Developer
LINCS Assessment Special Collection at
http://literacy.kent.edu/Midwest/assessment/
 
 
 
marie.cora@hotspurpartners.com
 

 
 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:49:14 EST