Quantcast
Environmental Health Perspectives Free Trail Issue
Author Keyword Title Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 111, Number 14, November 2003 Open Access
spacer
Objectivity and Ethics in Environmental Health Science

Steve Wing

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Abstract
During the past several decades, philosophers of science and scientists themselves have become increasingly aware of the complex ways in which scientific knowledge is shaped by its social context. This awareness has called into question traditional notions of objectivity. Working scientists need an understanding of their own practice that avoids the naïve myth that science can become objective by avoiding social influences as well as the reductionist view that its content is determined simply by economic interests. A nuanced perspective on this process can improve research ethics and increase the capacity of science to contribute to equitable public policy, especially in areas such as environmental and occupational health, which have direct implications for profits, regulation, legal responsibility, and social justice. I discuss research into health effects of the 1979 accident at Three Mile Island near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA, as an example of how scientific explanations are shaped by social concepts, norms, and preconceptions. I describe how a scientific practice that developed under the influence of medical and nuclear physics interacted with observations made by exposed community members to affect research questions, the interpretation of evidence, inferences about biological mechanisms in disease causation, and the use of evidence in litigation. By considering the history and philosophy of their disciplines, practicing researchers can increase the rigor, objectivity, and social responsibility of environmental health science. Key words: , , , , , , , , . Environ Health Perspect 111:1809-1818 (2003) . doi:10.1289/ehp.6200 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 19 June 2003]

This article is part of the mini-monograph "Ethical, Legal, and Policy Issues in Environmental Health Research."

Address correspondence to S. Wing, Dept. of Epidemiology, 2101F McGavran-Greenberg Hall, School of Public Health, CB#7435, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA. Telephone: (919) 966-7416. Fax: (919) 966-2089. E-mail: steve_wing@unc.edu

Several colleagues and anonymous peer reviewers provided excellent critical comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. I am indebted to the many people whose lives were affected directly and indirectly by the accident at Three Mile Island and especially to Marjorie and Norman Aamodt.

This work was supported by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Grant Program on Research Ethics 1T15 AA149650 and by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grants R25-ES08206 and R25-ES12079.

The author declares he has no conflict of interest.

Received 7 January 2003 ; accepted 16 June 2003.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML or PDF formats.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov