Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
A Study Comparing Tamsulosin Versus the Combination Tamsulosin Plus Solifenacin in Men With Overactive Bladder
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00699049   Information provided by Astellas Pharma Inc
First Received: June 16, 2008   Last Updated: February 23, 2009   History of Changes
This Tabular View shows the required WHO registration data elements as marked by

June 16, 2008
February 23, 2009
June 2008
Achievement level of patients' individual satisfaction [ Time Frame: At weeks 4 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00699049 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Changes in urgency episodes [ Time Frame: At weeks 4 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Changes in OAB symptom scores [ Time Frame: At weeks 4 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Changes in QoL score by OAB-q [ Time Frame: At weeks 4 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
 
A Study Comparing Tamsulosin Versus the Combination Tamsulosin Plus Solifenacin in Men With Overactive Bladder
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin Monotherapy and Tamsulosin Plus Solifenacin in Men With a Residual Overactive Bladder Symptoms of Urinary Frequency and Urgency With/Without Urgency Incontinence After Previous Monotherapy With Tamsulosin

The purpose of this study is to explore the additional benefit of solifenacin after 12 weeks treatment, compared with tamsulosin monotherapy in men with residual OAB symptoms

 
Phase IV
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Urinary Bladder, Overactive
  • Drug: tamsulosin
  • Drug: placebo
  • Drug: solifenacin
  • Placebo Comparator: tamsulosin and placebo
  • Experimental: tamsulosin and solifenacin
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
103
December 2009
December 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Persistent symptoms of OAB as verified by the 3 day voiding diary, defined by:

    • symptoms of urinary urgency (defined as a level of >=3 in a 5 point urgency scale) at least two episode per 24 hours and
    • symptoms of urinary frequency ( >8 micturitions per 24 hours)
  • On a stable dose of tamsulosin for at least 1 month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of acute urinary retention
  • Patients have a baseline post-void residual (PVR) which exceeded 50% of voided urine volume
  • Any condition that is a contraindication for anticholinergic treatment, including uncontrolled narrow-angled glaucoma, urinary retention or gastric retention
  • Symptomatic acute urinary tract infection (UTI) during the screening period
  • Treatment within the 14 days preceding randomization, or expected to initiate treatment during the study with any anticholinergic drugs and drug treatment for overactive bladder
  • A 5-alpha reductase inhibitor if started less than 3 months prior to screening
  • Patients with previous urethral, prostate or bladder neck surgery
Male
50 Years and older
No
Contact: Clinical Development Administration Department clinicaltrials_info@jp.astellas.com
Korea, Republic of
 
 
NCT00699049
Director, Astellas Pharma, Inc
 
Astellas Pharma Inc
 
Study Chair: Central Contact Astellas Pharma Inc
Astellas Pharma Inc
February 2009

 †    Required WHO trial registration data element.
††   WHO trial registration data element that is required only if it exists.