Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
RESEARCH AREAS BY SCIENTIST
Arvind Bhagwat
Kevin Chao
Ronald Fayer
Jeffrey Karns
Moon Kim
Alan Lefcourt
Yaguang Luo
Patricia Millner
Xiangwu Nou
Yakov Pachepsky
Contact Information
ARS News Articles
Research Projects
Publications
Jitu Patel
Mónica Santín-Durán
Manan Sharma
Dan Shelton
Jo Ann Van Kessel
POSTDOCS AND VISITING SCIENTISTS
Andrey Guber
Won Jun
Jung-Woo Kim
Yongliang Liu
Chun-Chieh Yang
 

Yakov A. Pachepsky

Soil Scientist

Research Soil Scientist

Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Lab
USDA, ARS, BA, ANRI, EMFSL
10300 Baltimore Avenue
Building 173 Room 203, BARC-East
Beltsville, MD 20705
Phone 301.504.7468
www.ars.usda.gov/ba/anri/emfsl/pachepsky

 photo of Dr. Pachepsky with visitors to BARC Public Field Day

Education

  • 1987 Ph. D. in Soil Science. Soil Science Department, Moscow State University, Russia. Dissertation title: "Regularities and models of chemical transport in soils of arid and semiarid regions"
  • 1973 Ph. D. in Physics and Mathematics, Department of Mechanics and Mathematics, Moscow State University, Russia. Dissertation title: " One-dimensional problems in rock mechanics "
  • 1969 M. Sci. in Mechanics, Department of Mechanics and Mathematics, Moscow State University, Russia. Dissertation title: "One-dimensional problems of ground mechanics"

Professional Experience

  • 2001-pres. Soil Scientist, USDA-ARS Environmental Microbial & Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD
  • 1999-2001 Research Physical Scientist, USDA-ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD
  • 1994-1999 Senior Research Scholar, Phytotron, Duke University, Durham, NC
  • 1992-1993 Visiting Research Scientist, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
  • 1990-1992 Professor, Soil Science Department, Moscow State University, Moscow, USSR.
  • 1988-1991 Research Leader , Institute of Soil Science and Photosynthesis, USSR Academy of Sciences, Puschino
  • 1985-1988 Lead Scientist, Institute of Soil Science and Photosynthesis, USSR Academy of Sciences, Puschino
  • 1975-1982 Senior Scientist, Institute of Agrochemistry and Soil Science, USSR Academy of Sciences, Puschino
  • 1972-1975 Minor Scientist, Institute of Agrochemistry and Soil Science, USSR Academy of Sciences, Puschino

Statement of Research

The purpose of the research is to discover, evaluate, and integrate knowledge about transport and fate of enteric pathogenic microorganisms in soils and landscapes. New hypotheses and measurement strategies have to be developed to evaluate and quantify biological, chemical and physical factors and interactions affecting surface and subsurface pathogen transport, and pathogen survival. The research uses hydrologic and contaminant transport modeling, soil-landscape analysis, scaling methods, data mining, geographic information systems, and other relevant technologies to integrate pathogen fate and transport information in pathogen transport models for comparison, evaluation, and selection of management practices to reduce or eliminate risk of surface and ground water contamination.


Collaborating Scientists

  • Daniel Shelton, Jeffery Karns, Jo Ann van Kessel, Ali Sadeghi, Craig Daughtry, Timothy Gish, Thanh Dao, Gregory McCarty, James Reeves, III, Charles Walthall, Jerry Ritchie, Vangimalla Reddy, Dennis Timlin, USDA-ARS, Beltsville
  • Scott Bradford, USDA-ARS, Riverside, CA
  • Elaine Berry an Bryan Woodbury, USDA-ARS, Clay Center, NE
  • David Goodrich and Carl Unkrich, USDA-ARS, Tucson
  • Jeffery Arnold, USDA-ARS, Temple, TX
  • Carl Bolster, USDA-ARS Bowling Green, KY
  • Dennis Flanagan and James Frankenberger, USDA-ARS, West Lafayette, IN
  • Michael Jenkins, USDA-ARS, Watkinsville, GA
  • Thomas Moorman and Mark Tomer, USDA-ARS, Ames, IA
  • Thomas Nicholson and Ralph Cady, US NRC, Washington, DC
  • Edmund Perfect, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
  • Teferi Tsegaye, Alabama A&M, Huntsville, AL
  • Jiri Simunek, University of California, Riverside, CA
  • Naraine Persaud and Brian Benham, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
  • Robert Hill, Adel Shirmohammadi, and Attila Nemes, University of Maryland, College Park
  • Michail Kouznetsov, Alexander Yakirevich, Jakob Blaustein, Desert Research Institute, Sde Boker, Israel
  • Diederik Jacques, SCK-CEN, Mol, Belgum
  • Eugeny Shein and Boris Devin, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
  • Fariz Mikayilsoy, Selchuk University, Adana, Turkey
  • Rien van Genuchten, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • John Crawford, University of Sydney, Australia
  • Miguel Angel Martin and Fernando San Jose Martinez, Technical University of Madrid, Spain
  • Krzisztof Lamorsi and Cezary Slawinski, Institute of Agrophysics, Lublin, Poland

Professional Affiliations

  • American Society of Agronomy
  • Soil Science Society of America
  • Soil and Water Conservation Society
  • American Geophysical Union
  • International Society of Ecological Modeling

Grants and Contracts

  • The interagency agreement "Model Abstraction Techniques for Soil Water Flow and Transport"

Current Projects

CRIS Project "Fate and Transport of Manure-Borne Pathogenic Microorganisms"

Utilization of manures containing pathogenic microorganisms is considered to be an important factor in the occurrence of water- and food-borne diseases. Currently many of the essential pathogen fate and transport processes are not understood or modeled well. This project focuses on manure-borne pathogenic coliform bacteria and has objectives of (a) determining dominant environmental parameters and processes involved in the fate and transport of manure-borne coliform bacteria at field and watershed scales in a hydrological context, and (b) developing predictive models of the fate and transport of manure-borne coliform bacteria at field and watershed scales. An integrated approach including laboratory research, field research at hillslope and watershed scales, and modeling, is used. Experiments and monitoring are carried out to elucidate and quantify survival and release of manure-borne pathogens in field conditions, interactions of pathogens and manure particulates, pathogen partitioning between runoff and infiltration and between sediment and water, suitability of manure-borne phosphorus and organic matter to serve as useful tracers of E. coli transport, and significance of background concentrations of E. coli for understanding fate and transport of manure-borne E. coli. Sub-models are being developed to explain or predict the efficiency of vegetated filter strips in retention of manure-borne pathogenic E. coli, and to be included in user-friendly tools for evaluating effects of management practices on pathogenic E. coli fate and transport at the watershed scale. A broad collaboration is initiated on developing methods of manure characterization, on monitoring studies, and for compiling databases for model validation and assessment.

Manure particulates serve as carriers, abode, and food source for pathogens. Relatively high survival rates are found for manure-borne coliforms in Maryland conditions.
The VFS efficiency depends on infiltration capacity, status of vegetation, and contributing area. The pathogen input from wildlife and survival of pathogens in stream and lake sediments remain the substantial sources of uncertainty. The bacteria transport submodel for the USDA-ARS Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was developed for the watershed scale. Currently a program is in place to develop and test the VSF-scale and the field-scale models.
Development of best management practices requires assessment of fate and transport of manure-borne pathogens at several scales:
  • Small-scale assessment is needed to evaluate the efficiency of vegetated filter strips (VFS)
  • Field scale assessment is needed to time manure applications
  • Watershed-scale assessments are needed to evaluate the efficiency of BMPs with respect to the water quality
Development and comparison of predictive models are the necessary steps in providing decision support tools for efficient evaluation of BMPs. We are collecting data for model development and testing at the:
  • Patuxent lysimeter site
  • Beltsville OPE3 experimental watershed
  • Cove Mountain Creek watershed
Research Components for
Model Development and Testing
Phosphorous as an Indicator of Pathogen Transport
MBP populations in fresh manure frequently increase due to the availability of nutrients and a favorable habitat and then may remain stable for up to a month. Subsequent mortality rates are highly variable depending on the animal diet, temperature and rainfall/drying conditions.
Pathogen Mortality Rates
The availability of a manure-borne indicator, which behaves similarly to manure-borne bacterial pathogen (MBP), would be very useful due to the high cost analysis for MBPs. Our data indicate that both release rate coefficients and subsequent overland transport are very similar for phosphorous and MBPs. Therefore, the substantial data base which exists for phosphorous transport may be applicable to MBP transport.
Pathogen Attachment to Soil
Partitioning of manure-borne bacterial pathogens (MBP) between solution and solids in runoff is important in evaluating the contribution of soil erosion in MBP transport. Our data show that the "solution-solids" distribution coefficient (Kd) is highly variable and is dependent on soil texture and manure consistency.
Factors Affecting Pathogen Transport
The extent of overland transport of manure-borne bacterial pathogens (MBP) is primarily affected by rates of infiltration into the soil profile. Infiltration rates are largely dependent on vegetation, which can both loosen soil and create plant litter that can filter runoff water. Using the novel heuristic method of data analysis - regression trees - allows us to define the relative importance of various factors affecting infiltration rates. Our results illustrate the need of properly designing and managing vegetation in grass buffers to mitigate MBP transport.
Management Practices to Minimize Pathogen Run-off


Our data demonstrate that riparian zones, i.e. vegetated corridors adjacent to stream channels, can effectively prevent runoff of manure-borne bacterial pathogens from land-applied manures to surface waters. However, riparian zones may harbor wildlife that contribute to contamination of surface waters by bacterial pathogens.
Sources of Water-borne Pathogens


Estimating fate and transport of manure-borne bacterial pathogens (MBP) has a built-in uncertainty related to the wildlife input. Monitoring data from an agricultural watershed shows that stream segments affected only by wildlife may have higher concentrations of MBPs than agricultural segments of the watershed. Another source of uncertainty is the background concentrations of MBPs in sediments. This uncertainty does not preclude the modeling of MBP fate and transport, however, it does need to be factored into the modeling process.
Modeling Pathogen Fate and Transport


Combining mathematical descriptions of microbial fate and transport processes leads to the development of predictive fate and transport models. The model STIR was developed to simulate the coupled surface and subsurface flow and transport of bacteria in grass buffers. We combined the three-dimensional FEMWATER model of saturated-unsaturated subsurface flow and transport with the Saint-Venant model for runoff and convective-dispersive transport with retention in the overland flow. The model was successfully tested with data on rainfall-induced fecal coliforms (FC) and bromide (Br) transport from manure applied at vegetated and bare 6-m long plots.

Interagency project:
Model Abstraction Techniques for Soil Water Flow and Transport
This project tests the model abstraction (MA) at the watershed scale. The MA is defined as a methodology for reducing the complexity of a simulation model while maintaining the validity of the simulation results with respect to the question that the simulation is being used to address. MA explicitly addresses uncertainties in both model structure and parameters. We are using the systematic and comprehensive protocol for implementing the MA that includes:
  1. defining the conceptualization of the hydrologic model and the questions to be answered
  2. determining the significant features, events and processes to be abstracted
  3. selecting applicable MA techniques
  4. identifying MA simplifications of complex representations that may provide substantial gain
  5. evaluating the base model for additional simplifications of complex representations.

MA can resolve:
  • difficulties in obtaining reliable calibration of the base model
  • error propagation by introducing uncertainties into the key outputs
  • difficulties in understanding errant simulations results of the base model
  • excessive resource requirements for simulating complexities in base model
  • the need for incorporating the base model in repetitive risk assessments of multimedia environmental model
  • the goal for making the modeling process more transparent and tractable
  • the need in justifying the use simpler model rather than overly complex model

The MA benefits include:
  • improving reliability of modeling results
  • making the data selection and input more efficient
  • enabling risk assessments to be run and analyzed with much quicker turnaround, with the potential for allowing further analyses of problem sensitivity and uncertainty
  • enhancing communication of simplifications resulting from appropriate model abstractions which facilitates decision-making and informing the public

   
 
Last Modified: 05/06/2009
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House