![150pxls.gif (76 bytes)](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090116141937im_/http://www.wto.org/images/160pxls.gif)
SEE ALSO:
> Press releases
> News archives
> Pascal
Lamy’s speeches
|
SPECIFIC
TRADE CONCERNS
Discussions on chemicals continue
Concerns were again raised on the EU’s draft regulation on dangerous
chemical substances (notified in document
G/TBT/N/EEC/151).
A large number of members are concerned that the proposed
re-classification by the European Communities of “borates” and
nickel carbonates, will have negative trade impacts. Although the
European Commission maintains that there is an established risk that
borates and nickel are toxic to human health and to the environment,
other Members question the scientific basis for this assertion.
The European Commission stressed that the purpose of the proposed
legislation is to inform (through a label) about the hazards and assured
delegations that it would review all comments received from WTO members
before moving forward with implementation of the amended Directive, planned
for 2009.
Other concerns related to chemicals included:
Members continue to raise concerns about the EU’s Regulation on the
Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) which is
about production and use of chemical substances (EC's website). The issue
has been discussed in 16 meetings of the TBT Committee. The first time was
in March 2003.
At this meeting, several members pointed out that SMEs lacked the capacity
to comply with this regulation due to its complexity and that the European
Commission's guidance documentation is not sufficient. Some members asked
the EC to provide technical assistance to better understand the provisions
contained in REACH.
The European Commission maintains that REACH is necessary to protect human
health and the environment and that it is neither too trade restrictive nor
discriminatory. It announced that it is organizing a
workshop on REACH on 14
April 2008.
The listing, by the United States, of
potassium nitrate (used inter alia in fertilizers, gunpowder and
fireworks) on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security list of
“Chemicals of Interest”. Israel and Chile claimed that this could
have negative effects on exports of this chemical to the United
States. The United States stated that also other countries regulate
nitrate substances for security purposes; the US delegation would
facilitate information to trading partners to help them comply with
the new requirements.
China's legislation on toxic chemicals,
which is currently being reviewed by the Chinese authorities. Japan
and the European Communities asked for an update on the review.
Sweden’s ban (G/TBT/N/SWE/59)
and Norway’s proposed ban G/TBT/N/NOR/6, Add.1 and Corr.1) on
decabromodiphenyl ether (deca BDE), a brominated flame retardant
used in fabric and plastics to make furniture, construction
materials, vehicles, cables and other products.
Toys
Malaysia, Thailand and the EC have raised concerns about
toxicological tests imposed by Brazil on imported toys (G/TBT/N/BRA/259).
In particular, these countries are concerned about certification
procedures and delays. Brazil said that these measures were
legitimate and had the objective of guaranteeing children's safety
and health.
On a separate matter, the delegation of China expressed concern
about an EC proposed Directive on toy safety notified in February
2008 (G/TBT/N/EEC/184),
arguing that the regulation, affecting chemical substances used in
toys, would impose burdensome testing and information requirements.
The Chinese delegation stressed that unsafe toys could also result
from inappropriate design.
At the meeting, China introduced its Export Toy Quality and Safety Control
System stressing that, in China, there exists a legal framework to ensure
that toy products are safe and that relevant international standards have
been adopted along with stringent export quality certification systems.
Other trade concerns
New concerns raised at this meeting
included
-
China's proposed standard for
restricting excessive packaging for commodities (G/TBT/N/CHN/321)
— raised by the European Communities
-
China's proposed standard on wines
(G/TBT/N/CHN/197)
dealing, among other things, with terminology, definitions and
labelling — raised by the European Communities
-
Germany's draft measure on seals (G/TBT/N/DEU/5).
It is noted that, on a related matter, Canada requested in September
2007 consultations with the European Communities under the DSU
concerning certain measures taken by Belgium and the Netherlands
regarding the importation, transportation, manufacturing, marketing
and sale of seal products (for more information see
DS369).
-
EC's measure on production and
labelling of organic products (G/TBT/N/EEC/101)
— raised by Argentina (G/TBT/W/284) and Ecuador
-
Japan's beef labelling Guidelines —
raised by the United States
-
South Africa's labelling of
foodstuffs (G/TBT/N/ZAF/66)—
raised by the United States
Concerns that have also been raised at
previous meetings of the Committee included:
(See minutes of previous meetings, e.g.
G/TBT/M/43)
-
Brazil's registration requirements
for Medical Devices — raised by the United States, the European
Communities, Canada and Switzerland
-
China's Administration on the
control of pollution caused by electronic information products (G/TBT/N/CHN/140
and
Add.1) — raised by Japan
-
China's regulation on gas cooking
appliances (G/TBT/N/CHN/237)
— raised by the European Communities
-
Norway's prohibition on certain
hazardous substances in consumer products (G/TBT/N/NOR/17)
-
EC's Directive 2002/95/EC on the
Restriction of the Use of certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical
and Electronic Equipment (RoHS) — raised by the United States and
Korea
-
EC's regulation on novelty lighters
(G/TBT/N/EEC/178)
— raised by China
-
Argentina's measures on
pharmaceutical products (G/TBT/W/280)
— raised by Colombia and Chile
-
Canada's compositional requirements
for cheese (G/TBT/N/CAN/203)
— raised by New Zealand, Australia, Switzerland, the European
Communities and the United States
-
India's regulation on tyres (G/TBT/N/IND/20)
— raised by the United States, the European Communities and Japan
-
India's regulation on cosmetics and
drugs rules 2007 — raised by the European Communities and the United
States
-
Israel's measure on infant formula
— raised by the United States
-
Thailand's labelling requirements
of snack foods (G/TBT/N/THA/215
and
Add.1) — raised by the United States and the European
Communities
-
US measure on flammability of
textiles (G/TBT/N/USA/242)
— raised by China
WORKSHOP ON GOOD REGULATORY PRACTICE
On 18 and 19 March 2008, the TBT Committee
organised a
workshop
for WTO members to share experiences on good regulatory practice.
Regulation is a major and increasingly important policy tool that
governments use to attain various policy objectives, including the
protection of human health, life and the environment. At the
workshop it was noted that emphasis is shifting from de-regulation
to “smart” or “better” regulation. Moreover the process of becoming
better at regulating is an ongoing process for all Members.
The Chairman's (Mr. Raminder Sidhu, India), summary report can be found
here.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the TBT Committee will take place on 1 and 2 July 2008.
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090116141937im_/http://www.wto.org/images/300pxls.gif)
|
The EU’s Regulation on the
Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals
has been discussed in 16 meetings of the TBT Committee. The
first time was in March 2003
Members raising concerns include: Argentina, Australia,
Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba,
Dominican Rep., Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Japan, Rep. of
Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand,
Chinese Taipei, Uruguay, US
Issues raised include: transparency, the need for
clarification and information, complexity, uncertainty, use of
international standards, unnecessary trade barriers,
non-discrimination, need for clarification and information,
technical assistance, special treatment for developing
countries, availability of technical guidance documents.
The EU’s explanation: a detailed overview of REACH in
the March 2007 meeting, in the minutes G/TBT/M/41, see
pages 5–9
Notification documents: G/TBT/N/EEC/52 and adds
Other documents: G/TBT/W/208 (from EU)
On the web:
European
Chemicals Agency |
|
• enquiry point: an
official or office in a member government designated to deal
with enquiries from other WTO members and the public on a
subject such as technical barriers to trade or sanitary/phytosanitary
measures
• notification: a transparency obligation requiring
member governments to report proposed measures to the relevant
WTO body if the measures might have an effect on other
members' trade
• technical barriers to trade (TBT): regulations,
standards, testing and certification procedures, which could
impact trade. The WTO’s TBT Agreement aims to ensure that
these do not create unnecessary obstacles
> More jargon:
glossary
|
|
> Problems viewing this page?
Please contact webmaster@wto.org giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.
![150pxls.gif (76 bytes)](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090116141937im_/http://www.wto.org/images/160pxls.gif)
|