Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)
Printable Version

Wetland Impact and Mitigation Data

Data Scope

Data is reported in two categories from each State, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia:

  1. total wetland acreage impacted by Federal-aid highway projects in the State, and
  2. total wetland acreage mitigated by Federal-aid highway projects in the State.

Data represents a census of all Federal-aid highway projects involving wetland impacts and mitigation. Acreage for each category is used as an indication of wetland loss and gain.

Data Collection

Method - Data are collected by State transportation agency environmental personnel by reviewing and collating information available in internal project records and other sources, such as Section 404 permit program.

Schedule - Data reports of total annual wetland acreage impacted and mitigated are received from each State at the end of each Fiscal Year. For example, data received at the close of Fiscal Year 1999 represents the impact and mitigation performance over the previous 12 months (October 1998 - September 1999).

Response Rates - Average response has been 92% . . . an average of 48 DOTs reporting / 52 total DOTs (4 years of data collection)

Nonsampling Error

Nonresponse Error - In the case of wetland impact and mitigation reporting, this type of error may result from incomplete or misplaced highway project information, restricted access to the information (such as sequestered information due to litigation), inattention to the request for data, or decisions made to purposely not report data.

Duplicate Entry Error - Project information containing wetland impact and mitigation data may be duplicated, for a variety of reasons, leading to inaccurately greater acreage totals.

Missing Data Error - This type of error may result from inadequate record-keeping. Wetland impact and mitigation acreages for some reason simply are not recorded.. This could be both inadvertent or purposeful.

Response/ Measurement Error - This error more than likely results from misinterpretation or from varying reasonable interpretations of the type of data requested for wetland impact and mitigation information.

Generic Statement - The occurrence of incomplete, duplicative, or misplaced information will depend on the record keeping requirements, organization and quality control of each State DOT. Basic project information required by grant regulations must be generated and maintained by all DOTs. However, non-mandatory information, such as that pertaining to environmental mitigation may not always be a part of the project record. Access to certain project records may not always be available to the personnel collecting and reporting the data. If access to project records is restricted due to litigation or other deliberative actions data will be unavailable for that project. The action ma y impose a blanket restriction of all project information, even though the wetland mitigation data may not be the reason for the denial of access. These two general types of nonreporting error would result in incomplete data reporting for the State that do report.

Again, depending on the quality control associated with project record-keeping, data discovery, collection and reporting, duplication may occur. This would be exacerbated in larger DOTs with multiple record systems and where the data is being collected and collated by more than one person.

Two forms of nonreporting error contribute to the less than 100% reporting rate, as discussed above. A request for wetland mitigation data is made each year by memorandum from headquarters to the FHWA Division offices. These offices in turn request the State DOTs to collect and report the data back within a certain number of days. For whatever reason, some requests could be misplaced or forgotten in the process. Also, there is there is the possibility that in some cases the requests for data may be intentionally ignored. Since the data reporting is by request only it may be unreasonable to assume that 100% of the States will report each year. Some State’s may not respond if they have no impacts or mitigation to report, i.e. a negative response.

It is likely that missing data error would occur most frequently on reports of mitigation acres since final compensatory measures may not be determined until well into the construction phase of a project when attention to environmental detail and record-keeping is probably not a major emphasis item. On the other hand, impact data is generally well-documented during the environmental analysis phase when accurate data reporting is an emphasis item.

Response error depends on the clarity of the request for data. Our request for data simply says that the DOTs should provide total acres of wetlands impacted during the year by Federal-aid highway projects and the total acres of replacement mitigation provided on those projects. However simple these statements may appear, they are subject to interpretation. For example, what is meant by the term impacted? Is it only the direct removal of the wetland as the highway is constructed? Or could it include indirect wetland impacts to wetlands caused by drainage alteration, secondary impacts, etc? The term replacement is also problematic. Does it mean actual wetlands replaced on the ground during the year? Or could it also include commitments to mitigate that will be carried sometime in the future? Following the first year of data collection in FY 1996, data reporting guidance was issued to clarify our request for information by answering these questions. The guidance removed uncertainty surrounding the type of wetland impacts and mitigation to be reported as acreage data.

Verification and Validation

Follow-up phone contacts are occasionally used to verify reported acreage which appears to be abnormally high or low. Informal guidance is provided to individuals to further clarify data collection and reporting. Also, FHWA has developed a wetlands mitigation accounting database, System for Wetlands Accounting and Management Program, for recording and analyzing wetland mitigation data. This database program will provide State DOTs with a simple platform of accounting for wetland losses and gains in their mitigation programs. It will facilitate the compiling and reporting of mitigation replacement data that is supplied to FHWA each fiscal year.



RITA's privacy policies and procedures do not necessarily apply to external web sites. We suggest contacting these sites directly for information on their data collection and distribution policies.