U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program--State Grants Program and National Programs - 2002

CFDA Numbers: 84.184 - Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities_National Programs
84.186 - Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities_State Grants


Goal 8: To help ensure that all schools are safe, disciplined, and drug free by promoting implementation of high-quality drug and violence prevention programs.
Objective 8.1 of 4: Reduce the use and availablility of alcohol and drugs in schools.
Indicator 8.1.1 of 1: Drug use in schools: By 2001, rates of alcohol use in schools will decline for 8th, 10th, and 12th graders, and rates of annualmarijuana use in schools for the same time period will decline for 8th, 10th, and 12th graders.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Rate of annual use of alcohol in school (in percentage)
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
8th Graders 12th Graders
8th Graders 12th Graders
1994
5 8
   
1995
5 7
   
1996
6 8
   
1997
5 8
   
1998
5 8
   
1999
4 7
5 8
2000
   
5 8
2001
   
4 7
2002
   
4 7

Rate of annual use of marijuana and other drugs in school (in percentage)
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
8th Graders 12th Graders
8th Graders 12th Graders
1994
4 8
   
1995
5 9
   
1996
6 10
   
1997
5 10
   
1998
5 8
   
1999
4 8
5 10
2000
   
4 8
2001
   
3 7
2002
   
3 7
Status: Unable to judge

Progress: Data for 2000, 2001, and 2002 are not available because no special analysis has been conducted of the Monitoring the Future Survey in those years.

Explanation: Rates of substance use in school generally parallel but are much lower than overall rates of substance abuse by youth. Rates of alcohol use for all grade levels have remained relatively steady for many years and are, therefore, unlikely to decline in the near future. Marijuana use rates increased in the mid-nineties, but recently have been relatively steady and may have leveled off. No 2000, 2001, or 2002 are available as a special analysis of the Monitoring the Future Survey was not conducted for those years. In future years a new data source will be used that provides regularly collected data and the indicator will be redefined.  
Additional Source Information: Monitoring the Future, 1999.

Frequency: Annually.

Validated By: NCES.

Limitations: According to NCES calculations, from 1976 to 1996 the total annual response rate for this survey varied between 46 percent and 67 percent. MTF does not release its data on in-school use; special runs for these data are generally not available until the spring of the year following the December release of other MTF data. MTF does not collect data for 8th, 10th, and 12th graders on drug use in school in a way that allows data to be compared across the three grades.

 

Objective 8.2 of 4: Reduce number of criminal and violent incidents in schools.
Indicator 8.2.1 of 1: Violent incidents in schools: By 2003, the proportion of high school students in a physical fight on school property will decrease, and the annual rate of students agest 12 to 18 who report experiencing serious violent crime, in school or going to and from school, will decrease.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Percentage of high school students who reported being involved in a physical fight on school property in the past year
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1995
16
 
1997
15
 
1999
14
 
2001
12.50
12

Rate of students ages 12 to 18 who reported experiencing serious violent crim in schools or going to and from schools (per 1000 students)
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1994
13
 
1995
9
 
1996
9
 
1997
8
 
1998
9
 
1999
7
8
2000
5
8
2001
 
7
2002
 
7
Status: Unable to judge

Progress: Target was met for 2001. Data for the next reporting period (2003) will not be available until December 2003.

Explanation: Measure 1: The percentage of students reporting being in a fight at school had declined since 1995. Standard error for 2001 data is +/- 1%.  
Additional Source Information: Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2001, National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), 2000.

Frequency: Biennially.
Collection Period: 2003
Data Available: December 2003
Validated By: Federal Statistical Agencies.

Limitations: YRBS data are collected biennially and reported in the year after collection; the 2003 data will be reported in 2004. While most NCVS data are reported the year after collection, in-school victimization data is a special analysis with a delayed release. The data collected in 2001 will be released in 2004.

 

Objective 8.3 of 4: Increase the percentage of safe and drug free schools and communities grantees that achieve results-based goals.
Indicator 8.3.1 of 1: Grantee progress: By 2002, National Programs grantees will demonstrate substantial progress toward achieving their results based-goals and objectives established in their applications
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Percentage of grantees meeting their measurable goals and objectives
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2001
84
75
2002
 
85
Status: Unable to judge

Explanation: Requirements for measuring progress toward goals and objectives have been incorporated into all applications for National Programs direct grants. No data are currently available for 2002.  
Additional Source Information: Review of grantee reports

Frequency: Other.
Collection Period: 2002
Data Available: January 2003
Validated By: On-Site Monitoring By ED.

 

Objective 8.4 of 4: Provide crisis intervention assistance to school districts.
Indicator 8.4.1 of 1: Crisis intervention: By 2001, the Department will implement policies and procedures necessary to ensure rapid response to school districts seriously affected by crises that interfere with learning.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
- No Targets And Performance Data -
Status: Unable to judge

Progress: Funding was approved by congress for this initiative in December 2000. Additional funding provided in FY 2002 appropriation. In 2001, ED initiated responses to eligible requests within 48 hours in 8 of 9 instances. No 2002 data are available.

 
Source: Other
Other: Record/File.

Additional Source Information: Review of program files and organizational plans

Frequency: Other.
Collection Period: 2002
Data Available: January 2003
Validated By: On-Site Monitoring By ED.

 

Return to table of contents