Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts for Research and development
(FY 2005)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2005
Total dollars: $50,026,591,443
The amount for this search is 13.0% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
Total number of contractors: 10,070
Total number of transactions: 67,137
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$12,299,048,961
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$6,445,080,807
Competition within a limited pool$11,275,910,104
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$1,394,283,076
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$706,201,293
Not competed for an allowable reason$17,521,152,611
Not identified, soon to be addressed$384,914,589

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

California 29 (Adam B. Schiff)$1,579,538,038
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$647,058,480
California 14 (Anna G. Eshoo)$630,264,791
Texas 22 (Tom DeLay)$522,595,873
New York 3 (Peter T. King)$513,522,481

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 Defense Aircraft -- Operational Systems Development (R&D)$6,381,381,595
 Other Defense -- Advanced Development (R&D)$3,575,068,948
 Space Science and Applications -- Applied Research and Exploratory Development (R&D)$3,258,450,743
 Defense Missile and Space Systems -- Advanced Development (R&D)$2,668,971,665
 Defense Electronics and Communication Equipment -- Operational Systems Development (R&D)$1,897,643,825

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NAVY, Department of the$13,914,680,725
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$10,842,832,437
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$8,600,127,591
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION$5,772,927,348
Missile Defense Agency$3,334,174,414

Top 10 Contractors

 Lockheed Martin Corporation$8,871,846,505
 The Boeing Company$5,609,281,521
 Northrop Grumman Corporation$4,543,102,782
 Government of The United States$1,871,372,476
 Raytheon Company$1,781,706,397
 California Institute of Technology$1,376,259,412
 General Dynamics Corporation$1,342,718,392
 United Technologies Corporation$1,124,049,125
 Battelle Memorial Institute Inc$749,825,902
 L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.$685,810,277

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$24,271,048,333
2001$26,196,795,019
2002$32,447,586,368
2003$36,279,406,601
2004$46,043,477,261
2005$50,026,591,443
2006$51,226,665,703
2007$55,046,312,388
2008$57,844,433,415
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$21,658,263,357


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 13, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.