Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts for Research and development
(FY 2004)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2004
Total dollars: $46,043,477,261
The amount for this search is 13.4% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
Total number of contractors: 7,149
Total number of transactions: 53,818
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$10,741,921,809
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$6,040,442,886
Competition within a limited pool$9,721,999,281
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$2,717,575,321
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$670,667,992
Not competed for an allowable reason$16,057,910,976
Not identified, soon to be addressed$92,958,996

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

California 29 (Adam B. Schiff)$2,767,288,577
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$1,012,437,475
Texas 22 (Tom DeLay)$502,100,209
New York 3 (Peter T. King)$282,739,379
Maryland 7 (Elijah E. Cummings)$242,280,050

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 Defense Aircraft -- Operational Systems Development (R&D)$5,338,683,484
 Space Science and Applications -- Applied Research and Exploratory Development (R&D)$4,159,103,345
 Other Defense -- Advanced Development (R&D)$3,559,788,937
 Defense Missile and Space Systems -- Advanced Development (R&D)$2,622,567,987
 Other Defense -- Applied Research and Exploratory Development (R&D)$1,566,916,809

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NAVY, Department of the$10,565,539,558
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$10,184,210,678
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$8,218,440,681
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION$7,646,297,574
Missile Defense Agency$3,012,612,984

Top 10 Contractors

 Lockheed Martin Corporation$7,889,946,614
 The Boeing Company$5,631,519,657
 Northrop Grumman Corporation$2,929,853,940
 California Institute of Technology$2,218,336,338
 Government of The United States$1,897,572,618
 Raytheon Company$1,276,718,320
 General Dynamics Corporation$1,084,823,913
 United Technologies Corporation$915,758,336
 Boeing Sikorsky Comanche Team$890,074,347
 Battelle Memorial Institute Inc$696,081,085

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$24,271,048,333
2001$26,196,795,019
2002$32,447,586,368
2003$36,279,406,601
2004$46,043,477,261
2005$50,026,591,443
2006$51,226,665,703
2007$55,046,312,388
2008$57,844,433,415
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$21,658,263,357


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 13, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.