Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts for Construction of structures and facilities
(FY 2002)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2002
Total dollars: $12,776,062,367
The amount for this search is 4.9% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
Total number of contractors: 4,492
Total number of transactions: 26,419
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$9,503,233,527
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$504,008,933
Competition within a limited pool$1,398,197,113
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$1,647,483
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$719,466,237
Not competed for an allowable reason$636,823,736
Not identified, soon to be addressed$12,685,338

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Alaska At Large (Don Young)$406,037,195
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$267,245,398
Georgia 4 (Cynthia A. McKinney)$123,023,673
North Dakota At Large (Earl Pomeroy)$90,864,277
Montana At Large (Dennis R. Rehberg)$67,114,764

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Office Buildings$1,771,726,022
 Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Other Non-Building Facilities$1,272,781,028
 Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Miscellaneous Buildings$1,143,454,278
 Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Other Administrative Facilities and Service Buildings$1,086,890,339
 Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Highways, Roads, Streets, Bridges, and Railways (includes resurfacing)$883,973,445

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$5,886,177,654
NAVY, Department of the$1,774,651,381
STATE, Department of$800,493,423
ENERGY, Department of$781,780,444
Federal Highway Administration$617,218,271

Top 10 Contractors

 Bechtel Group, Inc.$628,656,522
 URS Corporation$548,890,284
 Dick Corporation$495,214,563
 Phoenix Marine Co. Inc.$420,000,000
 Hensel Phelps Construction Co$395,884,106
 Clark Enterprises, Inc.$312,467,740
 AMEC PLC$240,925,183
 Hochtief AG$204,730,183
 Caddell Construction Co., Inc.$201,638,500
 Fluor Corporation$176,390,147

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$8,208,730,539
2001$9,710,339,800
2002$12,776,062,367
2003$13,259,617,703
2004$14,486,769,517
2005$17,981,668,919
2006$18,871,413,471
2007$20,450,361,792
2008$42,323,876,989
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$-7,998,108,959 **
** Note: negative numbers represent deallocations.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 13, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.