Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts for Maintenance, repair and rebuilding of equipment
(FY 2008)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2008
Total dollars: $18,880,152,563
The amount for this search is 3.6% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
Total number of contractors: 17,106
Total number of transactions: 133,655
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$5,880,004,392
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$1,729,316,858
Competition within a limited pool$4,180,116,170
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$21,962,449
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$813,690,173
Not competed for an allowable reason$5,806,460,801
Not identified, soon to be addressed$448,601,719

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Virginia 3 (Robert C. Scott)$1,512,148,881
Texas 12 (Kay Granger)$1,161,271,597
South Carolina 1 (Henry E. Brown Jr.)$994,306,338
Florida 24 (Tom Feeney)$882,670,421
Michigan 10 (Candice S. Miller)$805,001,032

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Aircraft and Airframe Structural Components$2,889,696,692
 Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Communication, Detection, and Coherent Radiation Equipment$2,273,773,676
 Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Training Aids and Devices$1,826,711,172
 Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Aircraft Components and Accessories$1,543,100,097
 Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Ships, Small Craft, Pontoons, and Floating Docks$1,103,402,222

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$6,571,169,489
NAVY, Department of the$6,502,343,788
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$3,968,253,645
VETERANS AFFAIRS, Department of$685,858,472
U.S. Coast Guard$218,016,465

Top 10 Contractors

 General Dynamics Corporation$1,904,568,766
 Lockheed Martin Corporation$1,700,892,164
 Northrop Grumman Corporation$1,553,107,066
 Raytheon Company$1,224,135,179
 The Boeing Company$946,545,861
 L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.$887,695,486
 Saic, Inc.$584,967,197
 Dyncorp International Inc.$559,216,134
 ITT Corporation$534,669,580
 URS Corporation$471,769,397

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$6,910,427,111
2001$6,779,532,094
2002$7,193,793,267
2003$10,292,149,859
2004$10,763,613,308
2005$12,569,039,518
2006$13,160,828,487
2007$16,505,211,363
2008$18,880,152,563
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$5,944,802,134


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 13, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.