Figure 5a. Comparisons of the standard error (SE) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for New England longline; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
Figure 5b. Comparisons of the standard error (SE) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for Mid-Atlantic otter trawl; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
Figure5c. Comparisons of the standard error (SE) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for New England otter trawl; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
Figure 5d. Comparisons of the standard error (SE) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for Mid-Atlantic scallop dredge; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
Figure 5e. Comparisons of the standard error (SE) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for New England scallop dredge; each dot represents a species group and mesh size
Figure 5f. Comparisons of the standard error (SE) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for Mid-Atlantic gillnet; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
Figure 5g. Comparisons of the standard error (SE) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for New England gillnet; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
Figure 5h. Comparisons of the coefficient of variation (CV) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for New England longline; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
Figure 5i. Comparisons of the coefficient of variation (CV) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for Mid-Atlantic otter trawl; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
Figure 5j. Comparisons of the coefficient of variation (CV) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for New England otter trawl; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
Figure 5k. Comparisons of the coefficient of variation (CV) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for Mid-Atlantic scallop dredge; each dot represents a species group and mesh size
Figure 5l. Comparisons of the coefficient of variation (CV) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for New England scallop dredge; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
Figure 5m. Comparisons of the coefficient of variation (CV) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for Mid-Atlantic gillnet; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
Figure 5n. Comparisons of the coefficient of variation (CV) of total discards derived by the two bycatch ratios (discard to days absent [DDA] and discard to kept [DK]) and the three methods (separate ratio [D1], combined ratio [D2] and simple expansion [D3]) for New England gillnet; each dot represents a species group and mesh size.
