December 18, 1998
Board of Directors
Massachusetts Co-operative Bank
1442 Dorchester Avenue
Boston, Massachusetts 02122
Members of the Board:
The notice of proposed mutual-to-stock conversion and subsequent amendments thereto,
filed on behalf of Massachusetts Co-operative Bank, Boston, Massachusetts (Bank) have been
reviewed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) pursuant to Section 303.160
of the FDIC Rules and Regulations. As described in the notice and amendments, the Bank
proposes to convert from a Massachusetts chartered mutual co-operative bank to a
Massachusetts chartered stock co-operative bank, which will be wholly owned by
Massachusetts Fincorp, Inc. (MFI), a thrift holding company to be formed as a part of this
transaction. As part of the conversion, it is our understanding that the Bank and its
holding company will create a Charitable Foundation (Foundation) with common stock
contributed by the holding company.
The FDIC has relied on information provided in the Bank's notice of conversion and the
accompanying business plan in reaching its decision. It is anticipated that notification
of any planned material deviations from the business plan, such as a return of capital,
will be provided to the FDIC in advance of the event.
Based on the information and representations presented, the FDIC does not object to the
proposed conversion. Please advise the Boston Regional Office in writing when the
conversion transaction has been completed.
Sincerely,
Nicholas J. Ketcha Jr.
Director
cc: Mr. Lawrence M.F. Spaccasi, Esq.
Muldoon, Murphy & Faucette
5101 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20016
FDIC
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429
Division of Supervision
December 18, 1998
Board of Directors
Massachusetts Co-operative Bank
1442 Dorchester Avenue
Boston, Massachusetts 02122
Members of the Board:
The Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the Board) has
today approved the request filed on behalf of Massachusetts Co-operative Bank (the Bank)
for a limited waiver of the depositor voting requirements imposed by 12 C.F.R. Section
333.4(d)(2) with regard to the Bank's conversion from mutual to stock form of ownership.
This waiver is granted pursuant to 12 C.F.R. Section 303.162(a)(2).
The FDIC's regulations at 12 C.F.R. Section 333.4(d)(2) require that the following
depositor voting procedures be implemented:
The proposed conversion shall be approved by a vote of at least a majority of
the bank's depositors and, as reasonably determined by the bank's directors or trustees, other
stakeholders of the bank who are entitled to vote on the conversion, unless the applicable state law
requires a higher percentage, in which case the higher percentage shall be used. Voting may be in
person or by proxy.
Massachusetts law requires approval of mutual-to-stock conversion plans by more than
two-thirds of the depositors present at a special meeting called to vote on a plan.
Massachusetts law prohibits voting by proxy for co-operative banks.
The attendance and results of the vote held at the November 12, 1998 special meeting of
depositors were considered in reaching this decision. The special meeting was attended by
250 eligible depositors out of a total of 4,686 eligible depositors, or 5.3 percent of
eligible depositors. All 250 eligible depositors present voted on the plan of conversion,
with 238 or 95.2 percent of those depositors voting in favor of the plan of conversion.
The 238 depositors who voted in favor of the conversion clearly do not represent a
majority of the Bank's depositors, as required by the FDIC's Rules and Regulations, but
the Board understands that it was difficult, if not impossible, for the Bank to obtain
votes from a majority of depositors without the use of proxies, which are prohibited under
Massachusetts law. In the face of this difficult challenge, the Bank made extraordinary
efforts to attract depositors to the special meeting to vote in person, including:
- Displayed seven prominent posters announcing the time and place of the meeting in the
lobby of its main office and four posters in its branch office.
- Provided depositors with 24 days written notice of the meeting, instead of the seven day
minimum required by Massachusetts law, and provided two follow-up reminders through the
mail.
- Advertised in five local newspapers from October 29 through November 12, 1998.
- Conducted 43 radio advertisements during the eight-day period preceding the meeting.
- Distributed reminder statements to every customer transacting business in the bank's
lobbies throughout the entire solicitation period.
- Distributed reminder notices in the October 1998 monthly statement to all checking
account customers.
- Required all bank personnel to wear lapel stickers advertising the meeting.
- Published several legal notices in the local papers regarding the meeting.
- Placed approximately 2,200 telephone calls to depositors informing them of the special
meeting and the importance of attending.
- Provided individuals who spoke Spanish, Vietnamese, and Creole to make phone calls in
order to reach the entire depositor base.
- Scheduled the meeting during the evening for the convenience of working depositors.
- Offered to provide transportation, at no cost, to and from the meeting for all
depositors.
Despite these extraordinary efforts, the Bank attracted only a small proportion of its
depositors to the special meeting. The Board recognizes that the 250 depositors who
participated in the special meeting represent a great improvement over the numbers of
participants at previous depositor meetings of the Bank. Over the preceding five years,
annual meetings had been attended by only 15 depositors, all of whom were insiders of the
Bank. The Board also recognizes that any further efforts are not likely to attract
significantly higher numbers of depositors to another special meeting.
The Board has provided this explanation of the approval of the Bank's waiver request to
emphasize the special circumstances of this case. Despite great effort, the Bank was
unable to meet the FDIC's requirement of majority approval by depositors of its plan of
conversion because Massachusetts law prohibits the use of proxies. Because of this, the
FDIC accepts that it is a practical impossibility for the Bank to obtain majority approval
through in-person voting only. The Board acknowledges the Bank's extraordinary efforts to
inform depositors about the special meeting and about the purpose of the special meeting,
and appreciates the Bank's dilemma in trying to satisfy the laws and rules of both the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the FDIC. For these reasons, the Board has approved the
Bank's waiver request.
Following receipt of documentation evidencing satisfaction of the remaining conditions
imposed in our October 13, 1998 letter providing notice of intent of nonobjection, and
provided further there has been no significant alteration to the terms of the conversion
transaction (by action of other regulators or otherwise), the FDIC is prepared to issue a
letter of nonobjection to the proposed conversion transaction.
Sincerely,
Mark S. Schmidt
Associate Director
cc: Mr. Lawrence M.F. Spaccasi, Esq.
Muldoon, Murphy & Faucette
5101 Wisconsin Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D.C. 20016