|
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090513043139im_/http://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp/images/pixel.gif) |
What is the historic record
of drought and drought variability for the Central United States? What
are the implications of this record in terms of what one might expect
in the future? Is the range of natural variability on a regional or
local geographic scale the same as the range of natural variability
on a global scale? How might a long-term global warming alter the natural
variability of droughts in the Central U.S. and elsewhere in the world?
Will a long-term global warming affect the magnitude and number of climate
and weather extremes? What regions of the U.S. and the world are likely
to be most at risk?
INTRODUCTION:
Dr. Roger Pulwarty
Program Manager, Regional Integrated Assessments, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Silver Spring, MD
SPEAKERS:
Dr. Connie A. Woodhouse
Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR), University of Colorado,
Boulder, CO
Dr. David Rind
National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Goddard Institute for
Space Studies (NASA/GISS), New York, NY
A 2,000-Year Record
of Drought Variability in the Central United States
The drought that occurred
this past summer, primarily in Oklahoma and Texas, had a devastating
impact on agriculture and agriculture-based jobs. Losses to the two
states are estimated to eventually top $7 billion dollars. This drought
started in April and was over in most areas by the end of September.
In contrast, the drought of the 1950s lasted five years and covered
much of the southern and central Great Plains. The Dust Bowl drought
of the 1930s lasted about seven years and in its worst year, almost
70% of the United States experienced severe or extreme drought conditions.
Just how unique were the droughts of the 1930s and 1950s? Given the
extensive impacts of more recent, less severe droughts, it is important
to know whether these droughts are part of the naturally varying climate,
occurring on a periodic basis, or if these droughts are indeed exceptional
events.
Instrumental records of
temperature and precipitation dating back one hundred years or less,
exist for much of the United States. Such records however, are too short
for assessing whether, for example, the droughts of the 1930s and 1950s
are unusual or outside of the realm of natural climate variability for
the Central U.S. Consequently, in the absence of regional-scale climate
models, and in order to obtain a more complete picture of the natural
climate variability of the Central United States, it is necessary to
make use of "proxy" or indirect records of past climates obtained from
tree rings, lake and sand dune sediments, riverbeds, and archaeological
remains, to extend the instrumental records of climate variability back
thousands of years. What has emerged from this effort is a long-term
record of drought and drought variability for the Central U.S., derived
from numerous proxy records, and spanning the last two thousand years.
The three main findings
of this analysis are as follows.
1. The paleoclimatic record
of drought for the central United States suggests that 1930s-magnitude
droughts are not unusual and that the 20th century is representative
of the frequency of occurrence of such droughts. Specifically, tree-ring
reconstructions of precipitation/drought indicate that droughts similar
in duration and extent to the droughts of the 1930s and 1950s have occurred
once or twice per century for the past 400 years.
2. A longer climate record,
made up of paleoclimate data from the western United States, as well
as tree-ring data from the central United States, and other types of
proxy climate information, suggests that two droughts, of much longer
duration than any droughts experienced this century, occurred in the
past 800 years; one lasting from about 1580-1600, and one that occurred
in the last quarter of the 13th century.
3. Although far fewer paleoclimatic
records exist back to the year AD 1, the beginning point of this study,
those that do exist provide some evidence for a possible drought regime
shift, that is, a fundamental change in the characteristics of drought
and/or drought variability. These records suggest that prior to roughly
AD 1300, droughts were longer and/or more frequent. Since this time,
droughts, for the most part, have been characterized by moderate severity
and have generally lasted less than a decade.
Assuming this 2,000-year
record of drought variability provides a reasonable estimate of the
natural climate variability one might anticipate in the central United
States in the future, a Dust Bowl-scale drought once or twice per century
would be a likely occurrence. The data also suggest the possibility
of an even longer drought occurring in the future. Although scientists
are beginning to understand what causes drought-promoting conditions
to persist on the scale of seasons to a year or two, far less is known
about what causes droughts of longer duration. Long-term droughts might
be linked, for example, to relatively slow but persistent changes in
Pacific and Atlantic Ocean sea-surface temperatures. However, more research
is needed to understand the causes of long-term droughts and to develop
the ability to predict such droughts.
The Question of Future
Droughts in a CO2-Warmed World
Increased droughts are
to be expected in a warmer world, and so are increased floods. A warmer
atmosphere can hold more moisture, and evaporate more water from the
surface. Thus, when it is not raining, available soil water should be
reduced. When it is raining, it could very well rain harder. Most researchers
agree then that a warmer world will have greater hydrologic extremes.
In addition, there is a basic imbalance that develops as climate warms,
between the loss of moisture from the soil by evaporation and replenishment
via precipitation. The land has a smaller heat capacity than the ocean,
so it should warm faster. Evaporation from the land proceeds at the
rate of its warming, while precipitation derives primarily from evaporation
at the ocean surface. As the latter is increasing more slowly, in a
warmer world, precipitation will not increase as rapidly as evaporation
due to the fact that the oceans warm more slowly than the land surface
(evaporation over the ocean is slower than over the land). Hence, more
droughts are anticipated in a warmer world, but the specific location
of such droughts is somewhat uncertain.
To address the question
of where droughts are likely to occur, one first needs to have a reasonable
sense of what the future magnitude of warming will be, and what the
latitudinal distribution of warming will be. For example, the greater
the warming at high latitudes relative to low latitudes, the more likely
there will be increased drought over the U.S. in summer. In contrast,
substantial tropical warming could give us El Nino-like precipitation,
with intensified flooding along the southern tier of the U.S. All of
these conditions are likely to intensify as the global temperature rises.
Output from General Circulation
Models (GCMs) has been used in an attempt to be more specific. Utilizing
soil moisture output from the GCMs, the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change) Working Group I (The Science of Climate Change) has
focused on the moderate probability that summertime droughts will afflict
middle latitudes (i.e., developed countries). IPCC Working Group II
(Assessment of the Possible Impacts of Climate Change) using the temperature
and precipitation output from GCMs has focused on the vegetative stress
that GCMs project will occur at low and subtropical latitudes (hence,
for developing countries). Clearly, available water (in the form of
soil moisture) and the health of vegetation (productivity) are two related
but somewhat different aspects of drought, for which an integrated assessment
of their combined effects will likely give a more thorough picture of
future drought possibilities.
What, therefore, can be
concluded about the likelihood of future drought in any particular area?
Each of the IPCC projections (GCM and Assessment model output) has a
scientific basis for suggesting that developed and developing countries
might be strongly affected. Least likely to suffer drought are high
latitudes, where flooding would seem to be a more likely problem. Modeling
improvements in both GCMs and Impact Assessment models are required
before scientists can estimate more precisely where the effects of floods
and droughts are likely to be most severe. In any case, because hydrological
extremes should increase in a warmer world, being prepared for such
events would seem to be a prudent strategy.
Biography of Dr. Connie
A. Woodhouse
Dr. Connie A. Woodhouse
is a Research Associate at the Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research
(INSTAAR) at the University of Colorado, and also works at the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National Geophysical
Data Center (NGDC) in Boulder, Colorado. Her research focus is on the
reconstruction of past climates of the central and western United States
using tree rings, and on the investigation of the relationships between
regional climates and patterns of atmospheric circulation.
Dr. Woodhouse's work has
been published in a number of peer-reviewed journals including the Bulletin
of the American Meteorological Society, Climate Research, International
Journal of Climatology, and theJournal of Climate. Her work
on the paleoclimatological record of drought has recently been featured
on CNN and CBS and in many national newspapers. Dr. Woodhouse is a member
of the American Geophysical Union, the American Meteorological Society,
the Association of American Geographers, and the Tree-Ring Society.
She is a member of the advisory committee for the Western Water Initiative,
sponsored by the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental
Sciences (CIRES) and NOAA; and is a consultant for NOAA/NGDC World Data
Center A for Paleoclimatology.
Dr. Woodhouse received
her Ph.D. degree in Geosciences from the University of Arizona in 1996.
Acknowledgements: The work
presented in this seminar is derived primarily from a recently published
review article in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
(v. 79, pp. 2693-2714), with Jonathan T. Overpeck.
Biography of Dr. David
Rind
Dr. David Rind has been
affiliated with the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center's Institute for
Space Studies (GISS) in New York since 1976, where he is currently a
Senior Climate Research Scientist. Since 1976 he has also been affiliated
with the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences of Columbia
University, where he is now an Adjunct Full Professor.
Dr. Rind has served on
various scientific panels, including the National Research Council committees
on Earth System History, Solar Influences, and Global Change; the American
Meteorological Society's Committee on Climate Change; and the NOAA Paleoclimate
Advisory Panel. He has been a member of various science teams, including
the SAGE II and SAGE III water-vapor measuring satellite instruments
team; and the Earth Observing System's Interdisciplinary Teams investigating:
climate variability, the mutual impact of climate, atmospheric chemistry
and aerosols (CACTUS), and the forecasting of seasonal climatic impacts
on agriculture (CAFE). He has been the recipient of such honors as the
NASA Special and Superior Achievement Award, and has been an American
Geophysical Union Charney Lecturer (Spring, 1995).
Dr. Rind is the author
of 150 peer-reviewed scientific papers, specializing in a range of fields
including climate and stratospheric dynamics, general circulation modeling,
trace gas and solar climate forcing, paleoclimate studies, satellite
remote sensing, land surface interactions, and sea ice and ocean modeling.
Dr. Rind received his Ph.D.
from Columbia University in 1976.
|
|