![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Home > News & Events > Speeches and Testimony |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Speeches and Testimony |
of Andrew C. Hove, Jr. Chairman
Before the October 8, 1997
Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, and members of the
Subcommittee, I welcome this opportunity to present the views of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on the future of bank
supervision and to discuss how we are addressing trends that
affect the industry and the regulators.
In the interest of time, I have a detailed written statement
to submit for the record. Before turning to your questions, I
will briefly describe our approach to bank examination and
supervision.
The bank and thrift crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s
taught us a number of lessons. At the FDIC, we took three
lessons especially to heart. One -- there is no substitute for
regular, on-site examinations of depository institutions. Two --
regulators need sufficient resources to maintain an adequate
level of bank supervision. And -- three -- adequate supervision
requires a surveillance system that can identify and track
emerging risks. Historically, we focused our examination and
supervision efforts on determining a bank's current financial
condition, rather than on determining the riskiness of the
behavior of the bank's management. Our historical approach
limited our supervisory responses when we were faced with
emerging risks that were not yet evident in a bank's financial
statements.
We have taken -- and are taking -- a number of steps to
address that limitation by focusing more on risk.
One important step was refining the examination process to
emphasize a bank's risk management systems and the risks each
individual bank faces. Our refined process allows examiners to
look beyond the static condition of a bank to how well it can
respond to changing market conditions, given its particular risk
profile.
Another important step was our establishing a Division of
Insurance in 1995 to monitor trends in both the financial
services industry and the economy more intensively. Currently,
our Division of Insurance is working closely with FDIC examiners
on several initiatives that will help examiners assess emerging
risk exposure for individual banks and groups of banks. One such
initiative is providing more timely and comprehensive regional
economic data to examiners, in part through the publication and
distribution each quarter of a Regional Outlook for each of our
eight regions.
A third important step is our on-going underwriting
standards survey. At the conclusion of each safety and soundness
examination, the examiners review underwriting standards with the
senior management of the bank and discuss any loans that require
particular attention. Our examiners then complete an underwriting
survey that requires an assessment of how a bank's underwriting
standards on various types of loans have changed since the
previous examination. The examiners also assess how those
standards compare with standards of other area banks. Results of
the underwriting surveys are used to detect emerging trends in
the underwriting standards by type of loan and by geographic
area. These trends are relayed to examiners in the field and
outside banking organizations through various publications such
as our Report on Underwriting Practices and our Survey of Real
Estate Trends.
These and other initiatives improve the FDIC's ability to
identify and monitor risks. To control risks, the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act called on the
regulators to implement Standards for Safety and Soundness that
enhance our ability to take supervisory action against risky
behavior before it harms the condition of a bank. In 1996, these
standards were fully implemented by the agencies and should
improve our efforts to address problems before they grow into
crises.
Madam Chairwoman and members of the subcommittee, several
trends pose supervisory challenges to the banking regulators,
including industry consolidation, new technologies, new and
complex financial products, globalization of the financial
markets, and increasing competition from non-bank financial
service providers. Some of these trends could benefit the
banking system greatly; all of them carry some risk. They all
have important implications for the supervision of banking
organizations.
These developments will continue, whether or not there is
legislation to modernize the financial system. Our risk-based
approach to examination and supervision will allow us to address
the changes the future holds and to help provide for a stable
banking industry.
Thank you -- I would be happy to address your questions.
|
Last Updated 06/25/1999
communications@fdic.gov
![]() |
![]() |
Home Contact Us Search Help SiteMap Forms Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Service Center Website Policies USA.gov |
FDIC Office of Inspector General |