 |
 |
 |
Home | |
Deposit Insurance | |
Consumer Protection | |
Industry Analysis | |
Regulations & Examinations | |
Asset Sales | |
News & Events | |
About FDIC | |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Home > Industry Analysis > Research & Analysis > Working Paper Series > Bank Loan Underwriting Practices: Can Examiners’ Risk Assessments Contribute to Early-Warning Systems? |
|
|
|
|||
|
Bank Loan Underwriting Practices: Can Examiners’ Risk Assessments Contribute to Early-Warning Systems? |
|
|
A bar chart that shows percent correct of predicted group 1 of the composite CAMELS rating prediction. In 1997, Specification 1 was 79.0 percent. Specification 2 was 75.4 percent. Specification 3 was 88.0 percent. Specification 4 was 88.1 percent. In 1998, Specification 1 was 73.6 percent. Specification 2 was 75.4 percent. Specification 3 was 87.6 percent. Specification 4 was 87.2 percent. In 2000, Specification 1 was 67.5 percent. Specification 2 was 72.1 percent. Specification 3 was 88.9 percent. Specification 4 was 88.9 percent. In 2001, Specification 1 was 72.3 percent. Specification 2 was 76.7 percent. Specification 3 was 86.3 percent. Specification 4 was 85.9 percent.
|
|
|
| Home Contact Us Search Help SiteMap Forms Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Service Center Website Policies USA.gov |
| FDIC Office of Inspector General |