Insurance
Program
Program Description
Deposit insurance is a fundamental component of the FDIC’s commitment
to maintain stability and public confidence in the U.S. financial system. By
promoting industry and consumer awareness of deposit insurance, the FDIC protects
depositors at banks and savings associations of all sizes. When insured depository
institutions fail, the FDIC ensures that the financial institution’s
customers have timely access to their insured deposits and other services.
To keep pace with the evolving banking industry and maintain its readiness
to protect insured depositors, the FDIC prepares and maintains contingency
plans to promptly address a variety of insured depository institution failures
and conducts large scale simulations to test its plans.
The Federal Deposit
Insurance Reform Act of 2005 removed statutory constraints on the
FDIC’s
ability to charge institutions for deposit insurance according
to the risk they pose to the insurance fund. The FDIC can now manage
the reserve
ratio (the ratio of the DIF to estimated insured deposits) within
a range between 1.15 and 1.50 percent, thus providing more flexibility
for the
fund to grow under favorable economic conditions and decline under
adverse conditions. The Reform Act also implemented an indexing
mechanism to
ensure that coverage levels keep pace with inflation beginning
in January 2011.
On October 3, 2008,
President Bush signed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008,
which temporarily raised the
basic limit on federal deposit insurance coverage from $100,000
to $250,000 per depositor. The temporary increase in deposit insurance
coverage
became
effective immediately upon the President's signature. The legislation
provides that the basic deposit insurance limit will return to
$100,000 after December 31, 2009.
Strategic Goal 1 Insured
depositors are protected from loss without recourse to taxpayer funding.
Strategic Objectives
|
1.1 |
Customers
of failed insured depository institutions have timely access
to insured funds and financial services. |
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
The FDIC
promptly identifies and responds to potential risks to the
Deposit Insurance Fund. |
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
The Deposit
Insurance Fund and system remain strong and adequately-financed. |
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
The FDIC
resolves the failure of insured depository institutions in
the manner least-costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund. |
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
The public
and FDIC-insured depository institutions have access to accurate
and easily understood information about federal deposit insurance
coverage. |
The means and
strategies used to achieve these strategic objectives and the external
factors that could impact their achievement are described below.
1.1 Customers
of failed insured depository institutions have timely access
to insured funds and
financial services.
Means & Strategies:
When an institution
fails, the FDIC facilitates the transfer of the institution’s
insured deposits to an assuming institution or pays insured depositors
directly. The FDIC’s goal is to provide customers with
access to their insured deposits within one to two business days.
The software used to support deposit insurance determinations
at bank closings is currently being updated to ensure the FDIC
can make quick and accurate claims determinations regardless
of the size of the failed institution.
The FDIC continually
monitors changes in financial institution operations and products
to ensure its ability to handle potential financial institution
failures. The FDIC develops, tests and maintains contingency
plans to ensure it is prepared to handle a wide range of potential
failure scenarios, including the failure of a large financial
institution; simultaneous, multiple failures; the failure of
an institution with large international holdings; and the failure
of an insured institution that operates primarily through the
Internet.
External Factors:
The goal of
providing customers of failed institutions with access to their
insured deposits within one to two business days is very aggressive
and might be difficult to achieve in the case of an extremely
large or complex institution or a sudden and unexpected failure.
However, even if it took somewhat longer to complete all deposit
insurance determinations, no depositor would ultimately lose
any portion of an insured deposit.
1.2 The
FDIC promptly identifies and responds to potential risks to the
insurance funds.
Means & Strategies:
The FDIC,
in cooperation with the other primary federal regulators, proactively
identifies and evaluates the risk and financial condition of
individual insured depository institutions. It also identifies
broader economic and financial risk factors that affect all insured
institutions. It accomplishes these objectives through a wide
variety of activities:
- A risk-based
deposit insurance assessment system whereby institutions that
pose greater risk to the insurance fund pay higher
premiums. The FDIC intends to incorporate additional risk measures
within the next year.
- A strong
examination and enforcement program.
- Collection
and publication of detailed banking data and statistics.
- A vigorous
research program.
- Off-site
risk analysis to target individual institutions for examination
or other follow-up activities, focus the scope
of an examination or assist in setting risk-based premiums
for an institution.
- The Large
Insured Depository Institution (LIDI) Program, which includes
a comprehensive analysis of the risks in all large financial
institutions (those with more than $10 billion
in assets) on an
ongoing basis.
- Thorough
review of applications for deposit insurance.
External Factors:
In spite of
the comprehensive efforts undertaken by the FDIC to identify
and respond to potential risks to the DIF, natural disasters,
public policy changes, and sudden economic or financial market
crises could cause broad losses within the financial services
industry and the DIF. In addition, a fraud perpetrated on a financial
institution could result in a sudden and unforeseen loss to the
DIF.
1.3 The
Deposit Insurance Fund and system remain strong and adequately-financed.
Means & Strategies:
The FDIC’s
continued status as an independent agency is crucial to its ability
to objectively assess risks and set appropriate assessment rates.
The FDIC maintains the viability of the DIF by investing the
fund, monitoring and responding to changes in the reserve ratio,
collecting risk-based premiums, and evaluating the deposit insurance
system in light of an evolving financial services industry. It
analyzes on an ongoing basis the growth or shrinkage of estimated
insured deposits, the current assessment base, loss expectations,
interest income earned on the fund, and operating expenses. This
information is used to develop a schedule of risk-based assessment
rates.
The FDIC Board
of Directors must establish a designated reserve ratio for the
DIF between 1.15 percent and 1.50 percent and sets assessment
rates to meet that target within a time frame that the Board
deems appropriate.
Recent bank
failures significantly increased the DIF’s losses, resulting
in a decline in the reserve ratio. As of September 30, 2008,
the reserve ratio stood at 0.76 percent, down from 1.01 percent
at June 30 and 1.19 percent at March 31. The law requires that
the Board adopt a restoration plan when the DIF reserve ratio
falls below 1.15 percent or is expected to do so within 6 months.
Absent extraordinary circumstances, the restoration plan must
provide that the reserve ratio increase to at least 1.15 percent
no later than five years after the plan’s establishment. The
Board adopted a restoration plan on October 7 that was based
on higher assessment rates. Consistent with that plan, the Board
also authorized publication of a notice of proposed rule making
(NPR) that would raise assessment rates and make other changes
to the assessment system in 2009. The other changes are primarily
to ensure that riskier institutions will bear a greater share
of the proposed increase in assessments.
External Factors:
As
discussed above, loss of independence could pose a risk to the
agency and to the fund. In addition, industry consolidation presents
benefits and risks to the DIF. While the risk to the fund is
diminished because of the diversification benefits of consolidation
(along geographic and product lines), the concentration of deposits
in fewer insured depository institutions increases the risks
to the fund in the event a large insured depository institution
fails.
1.4
The FDIC resolves the failure of insured depository institutions in the manner least-costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund.
Means & Strategies:
When an institution
fails, the FDIC facilitates an orderly least-cost resolution.1 Using
an estimated value of the failing institution’s assets
and liabilities, the FDIC markets the institution to potential
bidders. After analyzing the bids received, the FDIC conducts
a least-cost test determination and selects the least-cost strategy
to pursue.
External Factors:
In
accordance with law, if a failure threatens serious adverse systemic
effects on economic conditions or financial stability, resolution
strategies other than the least-cost resolution may be employed.
1.5
The public
and FDIC-insured depository institutions have access to accurate
and easily understood information about federal deposit insurance
coverage.
Means & Strategies:
To inform
consumers and FDIC-insured institutions about federal deposit
insurance coverage, the FDIC provides financial institutions
with a variety of educational tools and materials that are designed
to help customers understand their deposit insurance coverage.
In addition, the FDIC employs a variety of other approaches to
disseminate information on deposit insurance coverage:
- Operation
of a toll-free call center2 staffed by specialists who
respond to
questions from depositors and bankers.
- Training
and other educational opportunities to help bank employees
better understand
the FDIC’s deposit insurance rules.
- An
array of web-based educational resources for consumers and
bankers.
- A wide
range of publications and videos explaining how FDIC deposit
insurance works.
In 2008, in conjunction with the celebration of its 75th anniversary,
the FDIC initiated a comprehensive nationwide campaign to raise
public awareness about the successful history of the deposit
insurance program through regional educational events, print
advertisements, and the release of new, easy-to-read brochures
on deposit insurance coverage.
External Factors:
A significant
rise in the volume of bank failures or publicity that raises
public concerns about the possibility of significant bank failures
could result in bank runs by misinformed depositors or public
avoidance of an insured depository institution.
Timely, accurate and
understandable information is essential to alleviating these
risks. An increased volume of bank failures
and public concern about the possibility of additional failures
could also result in substantial increases in demand for information
about FDIC insurance coverage that could temporarily exceed the
FDIC’s capacity to provide such information. In such cases,
the FDIC would augment staff resources for this function as quickly
as possible.
1 In
resolving a failing institution, the FDIC calculates the estimated
cost of various resolution options and selects the option resulting
in the lowest total estimated cost to the DIF.
2 877-ASK-FDIC
(877-275-3342); 800-925-4618 (TDD-for hearing impaired)
|