Label Review Manual
Chapter 8: Environmental Hazards
Table of Contents
- Purpose of Manual
- What is a Pesticide?
- General Labeling Requirements
- Types of Label Reviews
- Ingredient Statement
- Use Classification
- Precautionary Labeling
- Environmental Hazards
- Physical or Chemical Hazards
- Worker Protection Labeling
- Directions for Use
- Labeling Claims
- Storage and Disposal
- Identification Numbers
- Company Name and Address
- Graphic & Symbols on Labels
- Content/Net Weight Statement
- Unique Product Labeling
- The Consumer Labeling Initiative and Pesticide Labels
- A. Does the Product Require an Environmental Hazards Statement?
- B. Statement Location
- C. Support for Statements
- D. General Statements
- E. Non-Target Organism Statements
- F. Miscellaneous Statements
I. Introduction
- The Environmental Hazards statement provides the precautionary language advising of the potential hazards to the environment from transport, use, storage, or spill of the product. The hazards may be to water, soil, air, beneficial insects, plants, and/or wildlife. Generally, the information contained in this section is based upon the results of seven basic acute toxicity studies performed on the technical grade of the active ingredient(s) in the formulation. These seven studies are: (1) avian oral LD (with mallard or bobwhite quail), (2) avian dietary LC50 (mallards), (3) avian dietary LC50 (bobwhite quail), (4) freshwater fish LC50 (rainbow trout), (5) freshwater fish LC50 (bluegill sunfish), (6) acute LC50 freshwater invertebrates (Daphnia magna or water flea) and (7) honeybee contact LD50. For specific data requirements see Part 158.
- In addition, data concerning a chemical’s potential to contaminate
groundwater or surface water, to drift, to adversely affect non-target
plants and bees provide important information. These studies are hydrolysis,
batch equilibrium, aerobic soil metabolism, field dissipation, and the
prospective groundwater study.
- The data generated from all of these studies support the language used for the Environmental Hazards statements. Review of the data is performed by the Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) or other science reviewers who may also evaluate any label text proposed by the registrant to determine what statements are required.
II. Reviewing the Statements
- Does the Product Require an Environmental Hazards Statement?
The label reviewer must first determine whether the use patterns on the label require any Environmental Hazards statement. The use pattern of a pesticide helps determine the need for and the specific text of the Environmental Hazards section. The label reviewer may conclude that all pesticides used outdoors must have the statement. However, the reviewer should also look at the proposed statement with a critical eye towards its applicability. Does it makes sense for the product? For example, a granular herbicide would not generally need a statement warning of potential spray drift problems since granular formulations are not "sprayed" and are seldom associated with any "drift."
- Products which are intended for use exclusively indoors may omit
the Environmental Hazards statement. Products applied to domestic
animals, such as flea collars or ear tags may generally omit the
statement. However, the statement may be required for a domestic
use product such as a dog dip due to the potential for contamination
of water by the use of a such a product. Thus it is important for
reviewers to carefully evaluate the use of the product to determine
whether potential risk from the transport, use, storage or disposal
of the product should be mitigated by the Environmental Hazards
statement.
- Manufacturing use products (MPs), although used indoors to formulate
other products, require some Environmental Hazards text because
MPs still are generally highly concentrated and could pose a serious
hazard if a spill occurred. A discharged statement is also required
see section F.1. below for recommended language.
- The Agency historically has required products labeled for use
outdoors to have Environmental Hazards statements on their labels.
- If the reviewer determines that the use pattern triggers the
need for Environmental Hazards labeling, the proposed draft labeling
must be reviewed according to the requirements outlined in the regulations
and the policy described in the remainder of this chapter.
- Products which are intended for use exclusively indoors may omit
the Environmental Hazards statement. Products applied to domestic
animals, such as flea collars or ear tags may generally omit the
statement. However, the statement may be required for a domestic
use product such as a dog dip due to the potential for contamination
of water by the use of a such a product. Thus it is important for
reviewers to carefully evaluate the use of the product to determine
whether potential risk from the transport, use, storage or disposal
of the product should be mitigated by the Environmental Hazards
statement.
- Statement Location.
The Environmental Hazards section of the label should be located under the general heading "Precautionary Statements." It must have the heading "Environmental Hazards" (not "Environmental Precautions," "Environmental Protections," or anything similar). [40 CFR 156.10(h)(2)]
- Support for Statements.
The text of the statements is then reviewed according to the type of action:
- If the action represents a submission accompanied by data,
the environmental science reviewer will evaluate the environmental
hazards statements and recommend any necessary label changes as
part of the data review. The label reviewer must specify all requested
changes in the response to the registrant. The necessary language
must be in accordance with mandatory/advisory guidance. See Chapter
3 and PR Notice 2000-5.
- The environmental reviewer is responsible for reviewing data on
all technical products and may also review data associated with
end-use formulations. Data requirements are governed by FIFRA and
the implementing regulation set out in Part 158. Generally speaking
data are required when an end-use formulation is likely harmful
to non-target organisms (for example, micro encapsulated insecticides
which are used on crops are potentially harmful to pollinators).
If the Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) Document has been
issued, it may contain appropriate Environmental Hazards statements,
but the reviewer should evaluate whether the RED specifically addresses
the use at issue and make necessary variations in the label statement.
If the reviewer is working on a me-too application for registration
(where another identical or substantially similar formulation is
already registered), the Environmental Hazards statements of the
similar formulation should be compared with those in the RED. If
the similar registered product label language is consistent with
the RED, the me-too Environment Hazard language should be the same
as the currently registered product. If there are no similar products
the application should be routed to EFED or the science reviewers.
Additionally, if a registrant wishes to amend the Environmental
Hazards statements, environmental reviewers may need to see the
amendment application.
- Since the cited label may have some statements that are outdated
and/or missing (required or recommended since the label was accepted),
it is important to check the regulations and the statements outlined
in the rest of this chapter to make sure that both the cited label
and the draft label reflect current Agency requirements and policy.
- If an error is discovered in the Environmental Hazards section
of the cited me-too label, the reviewer should write a letter informing
the registrant of the error(s) and request an application for amendment
be submitted within a reasonable time, such as 30 days.
- Since the cited label may have some statements that are outdated
and/or missing (required or recommended since the label was accepted),
it is important to check the regulations and the statements outlined
in the rest of this chapter to make sure that both the cited label
and the draft label reflect current Agency requirements and policy.
- If the action represents a submission accompanied by data,
the environmental science reviewer will evaluate the environmental
hazards statements and recommend any necessary label changes as
part of the data review. The label reviewer must specify all requested
changes in the response to the registrant. The necessary language
must be in accordance with mandatory/advisory guidance. See Chapter
3 and PR Notice 2000-5.
- General Statements
- Generally, all products with directions for outdoor, terrestrial
uses should have the following statements in the Environmental Hazards
section:
“For terrestrial uses: Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not contaminate water when disposing of equipment washwater or rinsate."
- These statements are preceded by "For terrestrial
uses," to make it clear that the statements do
not apply to the other general use patterns -- e.g., mosquito
adulticides, aquatic uses such as mosquito larvicides, aquatic
herbicides, piscicides, etc., greenhouse and indoor uses.
- Note that some Bt products do not require the above statements.
Based on the fact some Bt products are applied to terrestrial
agricultural fields to control mosquitoes in periodic standing
water.
- If a pesticide product is aerially applied to forests, the
above statements should be preceded with the phrase: “Except
under the forest canopy” There are many creeks and streams
under forest canopies. The statement as written allows spraying
the forest canopy, but requires spray valves to be shut off
when passing over ponds, streams, etc. not under the forest
canopy.
- These statements are preceded by "For terrestrial
uses," to make it clear that the statements do
not apply to the other general use patterns -- e.g., mosquito
adulticides, aquatic uses such as mosquito larvicides, aquatic
herbicides, piscicides, etc., greenhouse and indoor uses.
- For outdoor residential consumer products (except for lawn care
which requires the same statement as outdoor terrestrial uses),
the statements generally required by the Agency to meet risk/benefit
concerns are as follows:
"Do not apply directly to water. Do not contaminate water when disposing of equipment washwaters or rinsate."
- The reviewer must keep in mind the use pattern of the product
undergoing a label review. If the product is actually intended
for application to water - to control algal growth, for example,
the above two statements would be inappropriate. Or, if the
product is a residential aerosol spray in a can for application
to wasp or hornet nests, no equipment would be used, and the
statement regarding cleaning of equipment may be omitted.
- The reviewer must keep in mind the use pattern of the product
undergoing a label review. If the product is actually intended
for application to water - to control algal growth, for example,
the above two statements would be inappropriate. Or, if the
product is a residential aerosol spray in a can for application
to wasp or hornet nests, no equipment would be used, and the
statement regarding cleaning of equipment may be omitted.
- Products with directions for outdoor terrestrial uses requiring
a fish or aquatic invertebrate toxicity statement usually contain
a statement warning of hazard from drift and or runoff. The word
drift should be omitted if the product is a “Granular”
or if it is applied “in furrows”or injected into the
soil. The Agency has historically required that the following statement
appear in the Environmental Hazards section:
“Drift and runoff may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in water adjacent to treated areas.”
- Groundwater Advisories
- If the environmental reviewers determine that the chemical
(or major degradates) has laboratory-derived mobility (Kd less
than 5) and persistence characteristics (e.g., hydrolysis half-life
at any pH greater than 30 days or aerobic soil metabolism half-life
greater than 2 weeks) similar to other pesticides found in ground
water as a result of normal label uses, and no detections are
reported in ground water (for example, for a new chemical),
the Agency has generally required the following label language:
Ground Water Advisory
"This chemical has properties and characteristics associated with chemicals detected in ground water. The use of this chemical in areas where soils are permeable, particularly where the water table is shallow, may result in ground-water contamination."
- If the environmental reviewers determine that the chemical
(or major degradates) has laboratory derived mobility and persistence
characteristics similar to other chemicals found in ground water
as a result of normal label uses, AND:
- Detections are reported in ground water in a prospective
ground water study or other monitoring study conducted for
registration, or other reliable monitoring data in the publicly
available literature, or
- Field dissipation results confirm the chemical leaches,
then the Agency has historically required the following
label language:
Ground Water Advisory
"[Name of chemical] [A degradate of (name of chemical)] is known to leach through soil into ground water under certain conditions as a result of label use. Use of this chemical in areas where soils are permeable, particularly where the water table is shallow, may result in ground-water contamination."
- Detections are reported in ground water in a prospective
ground water study or other monitoring study conducted for
registration, or other reliable monitoring data in the publicly
available literature, or
- If the environmental reviewers determine that the chemical
(or major degradates) has laboratory-derived mobility (Kd less
than 5) and persistence characteristics (e.g., hydrolysis half-life
at any pH greater than 30 days or aerobic soil metabolism half-life
greater than 2 weeks) similar to other pesticides found in ground
water as a result of normal label uses, and no detections are
reported in ground water (for example, for a new chemical),
the Agency has generally required the following label language:
- Surface Water Label Advisories
The Agency has historically required the following statement to be added to all household and agricultural labels modified for the specific pesticide characteristics and targeted audience.“This product may contaminate water through runoff. This product has a [insert phrase a.1, a.2, or a.3, according to the pesticide’s “mean” soil partition coefficient (Kd)] for [insert phrase b.1, b.2, or b.3, according to the pesticide’s aerobic soil metabolism half-life] after application. Poorly draining soils and soils with shallow water tables are more prone to produce runoff that contains this product. [insert phrase c.1 or c.2 depending on whether the product is intended for the householder or farmer].”
- Soil Partition Coefficient Phrases.
- Kd less than 15 - “high potential for runoff”
- Kd between 15-300 - “a potential for runoff”
- Kd greater than 300 - “a potential for runoff”
- Aerobic Soil Metabolism Half-Life Phrases.
- T½ less than 8 days - ‘several days after application”
- T½ between 8 and 30 days - “several weeks after application”
- T½ greater than 30 days - “several months
or more after application”
- Targeted User Community.
- Household Label. Avoid applying this
product to ditches, swales, and drainage ways. Runoff of this
product will be reduced by avoiding applications when rainfall
is forecasted to occur within 48 hours.
- Agricultural Label. A level, well maintained
vegetative buffer strip between areas to which this product
is applied and surface water features such as ponds, streams,
and springs will reduce the potential for contamination
of water from rainfall-runoff. Runoff of this product will
be reduced by avoiding applications when rainfall is forecasted
to occur within 48 hours. [For pesticides with a soil partition
coefficient of “C” add the following, “
Sound erosion control practices will reduce this product’s
contribution to surface water contamination].”
- Household Label. Avoid applying this
product to ditches, swales, and drainage ways. Runoff of this
product will be reduced by avoiding applications when rainfall
is forecasted to occur within 48 hours.
- Soil Partition Coefficient Phrases.
- Generally, all products with directions for outdoor, terrestrial
uses should have the following statements in the Environmental Hazards
section:
- Non-Target Organism Statements
- The following statement has historically been required when a
pesticide intended for outdoor use contains an active ingredient
which has a mammalian acute oral LD50 =100 mg/kg, an
avian acute oral LD50 = 100 mg/kg, or a subacute dietary
LC50 = 500 ppm:
"This pesticide is toxic to [birds] [mammals] or [birds and mammals]."
- The following statement has historically been required when a
pesticide intended for outdoor use contains an active ingredient
with a fish acute LC50 or aquatic invertebrate (including
estuarine species such as oyster and mysid shrimp) EC50 = 1 ppm:
"This pesticide is toxic to [fish] [fish and aquatic invertebrates] [oysters/shrimp] or [fish, aquatic invertebrates, oysters and shrimp].”
- If field studies or accident history, such as the FIFRA §
6(a)(2) reports, indicate that use of the pesticide may result in
fatality to birds, fish or mammals, the following statement has
historically been required:
"This pesticide is extremely toxic to [birds], [mammals], [fish], or [birds and mammals and fish].”
- If a pesticide is used outdoors as a foliar application, especially
to crops, and is toxic to pollinating insects, a "Bee Hazard"
warning must be included in the Environmental Hazards. 40 CFR56.10(h)(2)(ii)(E).
The following table sets out the toxicity groupings and required
label statements for honey bees:
Honey Bee Toxicity Groups and Cautions Toxicity Group Precautionary Statement if Extended Residual Toxicity is Displayed Precautionary Statement if Extended Residual Toxicity is not Displayed I
Product contains any active ingredient with acute LD50 of 2 micrograms/bee or lessThis product is highly toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment or residues on blooming crops or weeds. Do not apply this product or allow it to drift to blooming crops or weeds if bees are visiting the treatment area. This product is highly toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment on blooming crops or weeds. Do not apply this product or allow it to drift to blooming crops or weeds while bees are actively visiting the treatment area.
II
Product contains any active ingredient(s) with acute LD50 of greater than 2 micrograms/bee but less than 11 micrograms/bee.This product is toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment or residues on blooming crops or weeds. Do not apply this product if bees are visiting the treatment area. This product is toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment. Do not apply this product while bees are actively visiting the treatment area. IIIAll others.
No bee caution required. No bee caution required.
- If a pesticide product is used to control aquatic weeds, the Environmental
Hazards section must normally contain the following statement:
“Treatment of aquatic weeds can result in oxygen loss from decomposition of dead weeds. This loss can cause fish suffocation. Therefore, to minimize this hazard, treat 1/3 to ½ of the water area in a single operation and wait at least 10 to 14 days between treatments. Begin treatment along the shore and proceed outwards in bands to allow fish to move into untreated areas. Consult with the State agency with primary responsibility for regulating pesticides before applying to public waters to determine if a permit is needed.”
- Pesticide products that include directions for mosquito control
may require one of the following statements in the Environmental
Hazards section, although the aquatic toxicity of the specific product
may lead to more or less stringent statements. For example, certain
bacterial larvicides, such as some Bt products, are considered non-toxic
to aquatic organisms and would not require any statement. Some pyrethroids
registered as mosquito adulticides are highly toxic to aquatic organisms
and may require stronger precautions than those listed below, tailored
to the specific products, in order to prevent water contamination.
Products with aquatic toxicity concerns between these extremes should
have one of the following recommended statements:
Larvicides--- “Aquatic organisms may be killed in waters where this pesticide is used. Consult with the State agency with primary responsibility for regulating pesticides before applying to public waters to determine if a permit is needed.”
Adulticides--- “Do not apply over water, except where mosquitoes are emerging or swarming, or to treat vegetation where mosquitoes may rest. Drift and washoff from vegetation may be hazardous to aquatic organisms [and wildlife] in or adjacent to treated areas. Do not contaminate water when disposing of equipment wash waters or rinsate. Before making the first mosquito control application in a season, consult with the State agency with primary responsibility for regulating pesticides to determine if permits are required.”
- If a pesticide product is applied to irrigation water and contains
an ingredient requiring an aquatic organism toxicity statement,
the Environmental Hazards section must contain the following statement:
“Irrigation water treated with this product may be hazardous to aquatic organisms. Treated water must either be held on the irrigated field until absorbed by the soil or not released for (number) days.”
- The following statement has historically been required when a
pesticide intended for outdoor use contains an active ingredient
which has a mammalian acute oral LD50 =100 mg/kg, an
avian acute oral LD50 = 100 mg/kg, or a subacute dietary
LC50 = 500 ppm:
- Miscellaneous Statements
- For certain registered end-use products, technical grade products
and other manufacturing use products (i.e., those used to formulate
other products), a "point source discharge" is a possibility
because effluent from the manufacturing plant may contain pesticides.
This does not include those products used to control roaches or
other pests in the facilities, but applies to those chemicals used
in the formulation processes.
- The Agency recommends that the following National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) statement (as outlined
in PR Notice 93-10 ) should appear on such products, in addition
to any other required statements.
"Do not discharge effluent containing this product into lakes, streams, ponds, estuaries, oceans, or other waters unless in accordance with the requirements of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and the permitting authority has been notified in writing prior to discharge. Do not discharge effluent containing this product to sewer systems without previously notifying the local sewage treatment plant authority. For guidance contact your State Water Board or Regional Office of the EPA."
- PR Notice 95-1 exempts certain end-use products [i.e., products
in containers of less than 5 gallons (liquid), less than 50
pounds (solid, dry weight) and in aerosol containers of any
size] from bearing effluent discharge statements specified by
PR Notice 93-10. PR Notice 93-10 still applies to the following
kinds of pesticide products that may result in discharges to
the waters of the United States or to municipal sewer systems,
including but not limited to: (A) all technical grade and manufacturing
use products; and (B) end-use products packaged in containers
equal to or greater than 5 gallons (liquid) or 50 pounds (solid,
dry weight), and registered for industrial preservative, water
treatment, other industrial processing uses (such as cooling
tower water systems, pulp and paper mill water systems, secondary
oil recovery injection water systems, food processing operations,
leather tanning, wood protection and textile treatment), and
commercial and institutional uses (including, but not limited
to, hospitals, hotels/motels, office buildings, and prisons).
- The exemption of certain containers from the labeling requirements
of PR Notice 95-1 does not relieve a producer or user of such
products from the requirements of the Clean Water Act or state
or local requirements, if applicable.
- The Agency recommends that the following National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) statement (as outlined
in PR Notice 93-10 ) should appear on such products, in addition
to any other required statements.
- If a pesticide product contains directions for use in treating
seed or is formulated as a granule, pellet, or treated bait, the
Agency has historically required the following Environmental Hazards
statements:
"Treated _________ [seed], [granules], [pellets], [baits] exposed on soil surface may be hazardous to ___________ [birds], [wildlife], [fish and aquatic invertebrates] or [birds, other wildlife, and fish]. Cover or collect _________ [seeds], [granules], [pellets], [baits] spilled during loading.”
- When the label bears a reference to mixing with other products,
the Agency recommends that the registrant add a statement such as
the following:
“Observe the most restrictive of the labeling limitations and precautions of all products use in mixtures.”
NOTE: Chemical specific statements, such as groundwater/surface water, spray drift/runoff, or endangered species statements will be added to the manual as they are identified. The label reviewer should consult with the product manager/team leader and EFED or environmental reviewer.
1 This information will be found in submitted data, the RED document, or the Registration Standard. It may not necessarily be available to the label reviewer, but helps you to understand the origin of the statements.
- For certain registered end-use products, technical grade products
and other manufacturing use products (i.e., those used to formulate
other products), a "point source discharge" is a possibility
because effluent from the manufacturing plant may contain pesticides.
This does not include those products used to control roaches or
other pests in the facilities, but applies to those chemicals used
in the formulation processes.