Jump to main content.


Notice of Receipt of a Clean Air Act Waiver Application To Increase the Allowable Ethanol Content of Gasoline to 15 Percent; Request for Comment

PDF Version (3 pp, 77K, About PDF)

[Federal Register: April 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 75)]
[Notices]
[Page 18228-18230]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21ap09-58]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0211; FRL-8894-5]

Notice of Receipt of a Clean Air Act Waiver Application To
Increase the Allowable Ethanol Content of Gasoline to 15 Percent;
Request for Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 6, 2009, Growth Energy and 54 ethanol manufacturers
submitted an application for a waiver of the prohibition of the
introduction into commerce of certain fuels and fuel additives set
forth in section 211(f) of the Clean Air Act (``the Act''). This
application seeks a waiver for ethanol-gasoline blends of up to 15
percent by volume ethanol (``E15''). The statute directs the
Administrator of EPA to grant or deny this application within 270 days
of receipt by EPA, in this instance December 1, 2009. In this Notice,
EPA is soliciting comment on all aspects of the waiver application,
including whether a waiver is appropriate for ethanol-gasoline blends
over 10 percent and less than 15 percent.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 21, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2009-0211, by one of the following methods:
    • http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
    • E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
    • Fax: (202) 566-1741.
    • Mail: Air and Radiation Docket, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2009-0211, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a total
of two copies.
    • Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA
West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20460. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal
hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2009-0211. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.

How Can I Access the Docket?

    EPA has established a public docket for this application under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0211, which is available for online
viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the EPA/
DC Docket Center Public Reading Room, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room 3334, Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is 202-566-1744,
and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is 202-566-1742.
    Use http://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the waiver
request, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of
the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select
``search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified in this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James W. Caldwell, Office of
Transportation and Air Quality, Mailcode: 6406J, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (202) 343-9303; fax number: (202) 343-2802; e-mail
address: caldwell.jim@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Statutory Background

    Section 211(f)(1) of the Act makes it unlawful for any manufacturer
of any fuel or fuel additive to first introduce into commerce, or to
increase the concentration in use of, any fuel or fuel additive for use
by any person in motor vehicles manufactured after model year 1974
which is not substantially similar to any fuel or fuel additive
utilized in the certification of any model year 1975, or subsequent
model year, vehicle or engine under section 206 of the Act. EPA last
issued an interpretive rule on the phrase ``substantially similar'' at
73 FR 22281 (April 25, 2008).
    Section 211(f)(4) of the Act provides that upon application by any
fuel or fuel additive manufacturer, the Administrator may waive the
prohibitions of section 211(f)(1) if the Administrator determines that
the applicant has established that such fuel or fuel additive or a
specified concentration thereof, and the emission products of such fuel
or fuel additive or a specified concentration thereof, will not cause
or contribute to a failure of any emission control device or system
(over the useful life of the motor vehicle, motor vehicle engine,
nonroad engine or nonroad vehicle in which such device or system is
used) to achieve compliance by the vehicle or engine with the emission
standards to which it has been certified pursuant to sections 206 and
213(a) of the Act. In other words, the Administrator may grant a waiver
for a prohibited fuel or fuel additive if the applicant can demonstrate
that the new fuel or fuel additive will not cause or contribute to
engines, vehicles or equipment failing to meet their emissions
standards over their useful life. The statute requires that the
Administrator shall take final action to grant or deny the application,
after public notice and comment, within 270 days of receipt of the application.
    The current statute reflects changes made under the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007 which explicitly extended the
section 211(f)(4) waiver provision to nonroad engines and nonroad
vehicles, extended the period allowed for consideration of the waiver
application from 180 days to 270 days and deleted a provision that
resulted in a waiver becoming effective by operation of law if the
Administrator made no decision within 180 days. The 1978 waiver for 10
percent ethanol in gasoline (``E10'') became effective under the
previous provision when no decision was made by the Administrator

[[Page 18229]]

regarding the waiver application and the waiver became effective by
operation of law after passage of 180 days.

Context of Growth Energy's Waiver Application

    On March 6, 2009, Growth Energy and 54 ethanol manufacturers
submitted a waiver application to the Administrator, pursuant to
section 211(f)(4) of the Act, for ethanol-gasoline blends containing up
to 15 percent ethanol by volume (``E15'').
    Growth Energy maintains that under the renewable fuel program
requirements of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which
is now primarily satisfied by the use of ethanol in motor vehicle
gasoline, there exists a ``blend barrier'' or ``blendwall'' by which
motor vehicle gasoline in the U.S. essentially will become saturated
with ethanol at the 10 volume percent level very soon. Growth Energy
maintains that a necessary first step is to increase the allowable
amount of ethanol in motor vehicle gasoline up to 15 percent (E15) in
order to delay the blendwall. They also claim other ways of delaying
the blendwall could include adding more stations offering E85 blends
and bringing in the renewable fuel mandate specified in the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007. For its part, Growth Energy
claims that the ``blendwall'' will make those renewable fuel mandates
unreachable and that there are substantial environmental benefits
associated with higher ethanol blends.
    Growth Energy states in its waiver application that its supporting
studies and extensive experience with ethanol support a conclusion that
E15 will not cause or contribute to the failure of an emission control
system such that the engine or vehicles fails to achieve compliance
with its emission standards. In addition to the information that Growth
Energy submitted, EPA is aware that several interested parties are
investigating the impact that mid-level blends (e.g., E15 or E20) may
have on vehicles and equipment. These testing programs are evaluating
emissions impacts as well as other types of impacts (i.e., catalyst,
engine, and fuel system durability, and onboard diagnostics) on
vehicles and equipment. The Department of Energy, working in
conjunction with the Coordinating Research Council and other interested
parties, is leading a substantial testing effort. Results from this
program to date are referenced in Growth Energy's waiver request, and
we expect additional data will be added to the docket as it becomes
available.
    One potential outcome at the end of our process, after reviewing
the entire body of scientific and technical information available to
us, may be an indication that a fuel up to E15 could meet the criteria
for a waiver for some vehicles and engines but not for others. Some
vehicles and engines may be more susceptible to emission increases or
durability problems that cause or contribute to these vehicles or
engines failing to meet their emissions standards. Assuming the
criteria are met for a certain subset of vehicles, one interpretation
of section 211(f)(4) is that the waiver could be approved in part for
only that subset of vehicles or engines for which testing supports its
use and for which adequate conditions or other measures could be
implemented to ensure its proper use.
    Another potential outcome is a conclusion that ethanol blends of
greater than 10 percent, but less than 15 percent, warrant a waiver. To
take such action, the Agency would need similar evidence, such as
emissions durability testing, as what would be needed to address a
waiver for a 15 percent blend.
    Any approval, either fully or partially, is likely to elicit a
market response to add E15 blends to E10 and E0 blends in the
marketplace, rather than replace them. Thus consumers would merely have
an additional choice of fuel.
    Experience in past fuel programs has shown that even with consumer
education and fuel implementation efforts, there sometimes continues to
be public concern for new fuel requirements. Several examples include
the phasedown of the amount of lead allowed in gasoline in the 1980s
and the introduction of reformulated gasoline (RFG) in 1995. Some
segments of the public were convinced that the new fuels caused vehicle
problems or decreases in fuel economy. Although substantial test data
proved otherwise, these concerns lingered in some cases for several
years. As a direct result of these experiences, EPA wants to be assured
that prior to granting a waiver, sufficient testing has been conducted
to demonstrate the compatibility of a waiver fuel with engine, fuel and
emission control system components.
    EPA has previously granted waivers with certain restrictions or
conditions, including requirements that precautions be taken to prevent
using the waiver fuel as a base fuel for adding oxygenates, that
certain corrosion inhibitors be utilized when producing the waiver
fuel, and that waiver fuels meet voluntary consensus-based standards
such as those developed by the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM). In a partial waiver for fueling certain types of
vehicles or engines, the condition placed on the fuel manufacturer
would be that the fuel is only used in certain vehicles or engines
(i.e., E15 is only used in the subset of vehicles or engines identified
in the partial or conditional waiver). EPA recognizes that there may be
legal and practical limitations on what a fuel manufacturer may be
required or able to do to ensure compliance with the conditions of the
waiver, including preventing misfueling. EPA has not previously imposed
this type of ``downstream'' condition on the fuel manufacturer as a
condition for obtaining a section 211(f)(4) waiver. EPA does, however,
have experience with compliance problems occurring when two types of
gasoline have been available at service stations. Beginning in the mid-
1970s with the introduction of unleaded gasoline and continuing into
the 1980s as leaded gasoline was phased out, there was significant
intentional misfueling by consumers. At the time most service stations
had pumps dispensing both leaded and unleaded gasoline and a price
differential as small as a few cents per gallon was enough to cause
some consumers to misfuel.

Request for Comments

    EPA invites public comments and data on all aspects of the waiver
application that will assist the Administrator in determining whether
the statutory basis for granting the waiver request for ethanol-
gasoline blends containing up to E15 has been met. EPA specifically
requests comment and data that will enable EPA to:
    (a) evaluate whether an appropriate level of scientific and
technical information exists in order for the Administrator to
determine whether the use of E15 will not cause or contribute to a
failure of any emission control device or system over the useful life
of any motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine (certified pursuant to
section 206 of the Act) to achieve compliance with applicable emission
standards;
    (b) evaluate whether an appropriate level of scientific and
technical information exists in order for the Administrator to
determine whether the use of E15 will not cause or contribute to a
failure of any emission control device or system over the useful life
of any nonroad vehicle or nonroad engine (certified pursuant to
sections 206 and 213(a) of the Act) to achieve compliance with
applicable emission standards; and,
    (c) evaluate whether an appropriate level of scientific and
technical information exists in order for the

[[Page 18230]]

Administrator to grant a waiver for an ethanol-gasoline blend greater
than 10 percent and less than or equal to 15 percent by volume.
    EPA also requests comment on:
    (d) all legal and technical aspects regarding the possibility that
a waiver might be granted, in a conditional or partial manner, such
that the use of up to E15 would be restricted to a subset of gasoline
vehicles or engines that would be covered by the waiver, while other
vehicles or engines would continue using fuels with blends no greater
than E10. EPA seeks comment on what measures would be needed to ensure
that the fuel covered by the waiver (i.e. a partial or conditional
waiver) is only used in that subset of vehicles or engines. EPA
acknowledges that the issue of misfueling would be challenging in a
situation where a conditional waiver is granted. To the extent a
partial or conditional waiver may be appropriate, please provide
comments on the legal and technical need for restrictions of this
nature. Comments are also requested on how the Agency might define a
partial or conditional waiver. For example, assuming there is
sufficient technical basis, should the subset of vehicles or engines
that is allowed to use the waived fuel be defined by model year of
production, engine size, application (e.g., highway vehicle vs. nonroad
engine), or some other defining characteristic.
    (e) Any education efforts that would be needed to inform the public
about the new fuel that would be available if a waiver is granted. To
address the possibility of a grant of a conditional or partial waiver,
the Agency requests specific comments on public education measures that
would be needed if the waiver allowed the fuel to be used only in a
subset of existing vehicles or engines.
    Commenters should include data or specific examples in support of
their comments in order to aid the Administrator in determining whether
to grant or deny the waiver request. In order for any testing programs
evaluating emissions impacts, as well as other types of impacts (i.e.,
catalyst, engine, fuel system durability, or onboard diagnostics), to
be useful in EPA's evaluation of Growth Energy's waiver application,
any mid-level ethanol blend testing or other analyses should consider
such impacts across a range of engines and equipment (including the
fuel systems) that are currently in service and that could be exposed
to mid-level ethanol blends. Such testing and analyses should also
assess the long-term impacts of such blends. EPA specifically solicits
the data and results from such testing and analyses.
    Although it is not a specific criterion by which to evaluate a
waiver request under section 211(f), any approved waiver could require
program changes to accommodate this new fuel. EPA seeks comment on the
effect of a potential waiver for ethanol blends above 10 percent and up
to 15 percent on existing fuel programs (e.g., gasoline detergent
certification, protection of underground storage tanks, etc.) and on
the gasoline production, distribution and marketing infrastructure. For
example, would EPA need to modify its RFG and anti-dumping regulations
to account for a higher blend? EPA also seeks comment on the dynamics
of the blendwall concern raised by Growth Energy, the extent to which
the use of an E15 blend would in practice help address this concern,
and what additional steps would have to be taken to bring E15 to market
should a waiver be granted.

    Dated: April 15, 2009.
Elizabeth Craig,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. E9-9115 Filed 4-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

 
 


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.