Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
COPD on Primary Care Treatment (COOPT)
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00184977   Information provided by Radboud University
First Received: September 12, 2005   Last Updated: August 17, 2006   History of Changes
This Tabular View shows the required WHO registration data elements as marked by

September 12, 2005
August 17, 2006
December 1998
exacerbations of COPD, condition-specific quality of life
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00184977 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
lung function decline, respiratory symptoms
Same as current
 
COPD on Primary Care Treatment (COOPT)
A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Inhaled Fluticason Propionate Versus Oral N-Acetylcysteine in the Treatment of Patients With COPD in General Practice

The aim of this family practice based study is to determine the long-term treatment effects of two drugs that are presumed to modify the course and progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), oral N-acetylcysteine and inhaled corticosteroids.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disorder characterised by symptoms and abnormal tests of expiratory flow that do not change markedly over periods of several months observation. COPD includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema. It is not fully clear which medication is the most efficacious in the long-term treatment of COPD. In contrast to asthma, the efficacy and therefore the precise role of inhaled corticosteroids is less clear in the treatment of patients with COPD. The same applies to another (much less investigated) possibility in the treatment of COPD, the anti-oxidant agent N-acetylcysteine. N-acetylcysteine is used as a mucolytic agent in a variety of clinical conditions, such as acute and chronic bronchitis and cystic fibrosis. The aim of this study, which is performed in family practices, is to determine the 3-year treatment effects and cost-effectiveness of oral N-acetylcysteine versus an inhaled corticosteroid (fluticason propionate) in modifying the course and progression of COPD.

Comparisons: N-acetylcysteine (oral, 600 mg o.d.) and fluticason propionate (dry powder inhalation, 500 mcg b.i.d.) are compared with placebo

Phase IV
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
  • Lung Diseases, Obstructive
  • Bronchitis, Chronic
  • Drug: N-acetylcysteine
  • Drug: fluticasone propionate
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
270
January 2003
 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 30 and 75 years
  • being a smoker or ex-smoker
  • post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio is <88% of the predicted value in case of men or <89% of the predicted value in case of women
  • post-bronchodilator FEV1>=40% and <90% of the predicted value
  • subjects have a GP diagnosis of COPD or had increased cough, sputum and/or dyspnea on most days for 3 or more months a year, for at least the last 2 years
  • able to provide a written informed consent
  • expected to be able to comply with the study protocol
  • able to communicate with the study personnel and to understand and read instructions
  • females of childbearing potential should use an acceptable method for birth control

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a known history of intolerance or allergy for N-acetylcysteine or fluticason
  • use of long-term oxygen therapy or expected to be in need of oxygen therapy within the next 3 years
  • registered asthma, allergic rhinitis, and/or allergic eczema as an active problem in the GPs records within the last 12 months
  • alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency
  • cystic fibrosis
  • active infection due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis
  • status post-lobectomy
  • clinically proven gastric or duodenal ulcer in the previous six months
  • non-compensated severe chronic congestive heart failure
  • life expectancy reduction (e.g. malignancies)
  • evidence of illicit drug use or abuse of alcohol intake
  • expected not to be compliant in taking medications in general
  • being pregnant or giving breastfeeding
  • not complying with the inclusion criteria
Both
30 Years to 75 Years
No
 
Netherlands
 
 
NCT00184977
 
95093 FLU9802 NAC-NL-11
Radboud University
  • Dutch Health Care Insurance Board (CVZ)
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Zambon SpA
  • The Netherlands Asthma Foundation
Principal Investigator: Tjard RJ Schermer, MSc, PhD Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Family Medicine
Study Director: Chris van Weel, MD, PhD Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Family Medicine
Radboud University
August 2006

 †    Required WHO trial registration data element.
††   WHO trial registration data element that is required only if it exists.