Renewable Energy and Manure Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
Programs and Projects
 

Research Project: MINIMIZING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF LIVESTOCK MANURES USING INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT REGIMENS

Location: Renewable Energy and Manure Management Research

Title: Ammonia emissions from a beef cattle feedyard on the Southern High Plains

Authors
item Todd, Richard
item Cole, Noel
item Clark, Ray
item Flesch, Thomas - UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA
item Harper, Lowry - UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
item Baek, Bok-H - NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV

Submitted to: Atmospheric Environment
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: May 8, 2008
Publication Date: September 1, 2008
Citation: Todd, R.W., Cole, N.A., Clark, R.N., Flesch, T.K., Harper, L.A., Baek, B. 2008. Ammonia emissions from a beef cattle feedyard on the Southern High Plains. Atmospheric Environment. 42:6797-6805. [doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.013]

Interpretive Summary: Ammonia is a nitrogen compound released to the atmosphere from concentrated animal feeding operations. Excess ammonia-nitrogen can overfertilize and degrade sensitive ecosystems. Ammonia is a precursor to minute atmospheric particles that can affect health and degrade air quality. Accurate estimation of ammonia emissions from cattle feedlots requires measurements of ammonia concentration and some kind of atmospheric dispersion model that incorporates the physical mechanism of how ammonia is removed and swept away from a feedyard into the atmosphere. Ammonia emission (loss to the atmosphere) for a commercial beef cattle feedyard on the Southern High Plains was quantified using an inverse dispersion model and measured profiles of ammonia concentration, wind speed, and air temperature. Annually, for every head of beef produced in the feedyard, 19.3 kg of ammonia was lost to the atmosphere. For every metric ton of beef cattle produced in a year, 70.2 kg of ammonia was lost. Annual ammonia loss tends to be about 50% of the nitrogen fed to cattle. Summer emissions are about twice as great as in the winter. Ammonia emission is sensitive to crude protein content of cattle diets, and increases as protein increases beyond cattle requirements. This research greatly expanded the database of ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedyards. However, longer term monitoring of ammonia emissions from feedyards is needed over a greater range of management practices, such as diets, manure harvesting, and sprinkler dust control. Inverse dispersion models show great utility and could be useful in a wide variety of monitoring and simulation applications.

Technical Abstract: Human activity has more than doubled the amount of reactive nitrogen that cycles through terrestrial ecosystems, with many negative impacts on ecosystem function and health, and air quality. Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) are major sources of ammonia emitted into the atmosphere. There is considerable literature on ammonia emissions from poultry and swine CAFO, but few comprehensive studies have investigated large, open lot beef cattle feedyards. Ammonia emission rates and emission factors for a commercial beef cattle feedyard on the southern High Plains were quantified using measured profiles of ammonia concentration, wind speed and air temperature, and an inverse dispersion model. Mean summer emission rate was 7420 kg NH3 d-1, and winter emission rate was about half that, at 3330 kg NH3 d-1. Annual NH3-N emission rate was 4430 kg NH3-N d-1, which was 53% of the N fed to cattle. Daily per capita NH3-N losses increased by 10-64% after the daily per capita N in feed rations increased by 15-26%. Annual emission factors for the pen area of the feedyard were 19.3 kg NH3 (head fed)-1, or 70.2 kg NH3 Mg-1 biomass produced. Annual emission factors for the retention pond of the feedyard were estimated to be 0.9 kg NH3 (head fed)-1, or 3.2 kg NH3 Mg-1 biomass produced.

   

 
Project Team
Cole, Noel - Andy
Todd, Richard - Rick
Rice, William - Bill
Purdy, Charles - Bill
Clark, Ray - Nolan
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Air Quality (203)
  Water Availability and Water Management (211)
  Manure and Byproduct Utilization (206)
 
Related Projects
   FORAGE INTAKE AND PERFORMANCE OF STOCKER CATTLE SUPPLEMENTED WITH WET SORGHUM AND CORN DISTILLER'S GRAINS
   EFFECTS OF FAT LEVEL AND GRAIN PROCESSING ON NUTRIENT UTILIZATION BY FINISHING BEEF CATTLE FED DIETS CONTAINING DISTILLERS GRAINS
   AIR QUALITY: ODOR, DUST, AND GASEOUS EMISSIONS FROM CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS IN THE SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS
   THE SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS DAIRY CONSORTIUM
   UTILIZING DRIED DISTILLER'S GRAINS AS PROTEIN SUPPLEMENT TO CATTLE CONSUMING LOW-QUALITY FORAGE AND RAPID ANALYSIS USING NIRS
   SUPPLEMENTAL DISTILLER'S GRAINS PLUS CONDENSED SOLUBLES FOR STOCKER CATTLE GRAZING SUMMER NATIVE RANGE
   ENHANCING FEEDYARD BEEF CATTLE PRODUCTION THROUGH EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE UTILIZATION OF ETHANOL BY-PRODUCTS: ARS-BUSHLAND
   EVALUATION OF WHOLE CORN SUBSTITUTION IN STEAM-FLAKED CORN DIETS CONTAINING DIFFERING LEVELS OF WET DISTILLER'S GRAINS
   EFFECTS OF CORN PROCESSING AND WET DISTILLER'S GRAINS ON IN VITRO HYDROGEN SULFIDE PRODUCTION
 
 
Last Modified: 10/22/2008
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House