4. FY 2003 Performance Goals and Indicators
This section provides an overview of the ETA FY 2003 performance goals as they align with the Department's cross-cutting goals. It should be noted that for some of the performance goals baseline data is not currently available. ETA is committed to, and continues to develop, measurement systems to respond to legislative changes and requirements and to use for strategic and performance planning purposes. This includes defining measures and establishing baselines for the goals identified. Much of this information will be finalized after PY 2000, which ends June 30, 2001. PY 2000 is the first full year for the Workforce Investment Act.
4.1 Strategy for Validation of Performance Measures and Indicators
The Employment and Training Administration continues to address the need to ensure the accuracy and reliability of performance data submitted by our employment and training system partners that serves as the foundation for key program decisions. The development of a comprehensive data validity system for the core indicators of the WIA program, Wagner-Peyser, and other key employment and training programs will be substantially completed in FY 2002.
In FY 2003, ETA will focus attention on training and technical assistance to deploy the data validity system among states and other grantees. Office of Inspector General reports have raised issues about the accuracy and reliability of data used to measure the outcome performance of the Welfare to Work program and the recently implemented Trade Adjustment Participant Reports. Both programs are expected to be the subject of special attention with regard to the validity and verification system.
4.2 FY 2003 Performance Goals and Indicators by Strategic Goal
The following section of this APP provides specific performance goals of the ETA as related to each Departmental cross-cutting strategic goal. For each outcome goal a listing is provided of the programs and total program budget (excluding program administration) supporting the outcome goal. Further, for each program, or set of programs supporting an outcome goal, there is provided in summary tabular form information on:
Responsible for an
effective, results-oriented workforce development system that is
valued by its customers and investors, the Employment and Training
Administration is directly involved in creating means and strategies
to achieve the Department's three Strategic Goals. This section
provides specific information on ETA's means and strategies to address
those three goals, organized by individual outcome goals that are
specific to the Agency.
Shared accountability is one of the guiding principles of the Workforce
Investment Act. Under this principle, statewide goals for the performance
indicators stipulated in the Act are to be developed through a process
of negotiation between the States and the Department of Labor. The
national performance goals for the WIA performance indicators represent
a weighted average of the goals negotiated with the States.
A
PREPARED WORKFORCE Outcome Goal 1.1: Increase Employment, Earnings and Assistance
Re-employment Services Grants to States Total Budget: $2,375,983,000 |
Adult
Formula Grants
Performance and Goals
Goal
1.1A: Increase the employment, retention, and earnings of individuals
registered under the WIA adult program. (DOL 1.1A) |
|||||||
Indicator | Targeted Population | Program | PY 1999 Performance | PY 2000 Performance | PY 2001 Goal | PY 2002 Goal | PY 2003 Goal |
Employment in the first quarter after program exit (1.1A) | Adults | WIA Adult Program | * | N/A** | 68% | 70% | 71%^ |
Retention in employment in the third quarter after program exit of those who were employed in the first quarter after program exit (1.1A) | Adults | WIA Adult Program | * | 78% | 78% | 80% | 82%^ |
Average earnings change for those employed in the first quarter after program exit and still employed in the third quarter after program exit** (1.1A) | Adults | WIA Adult Program | * | $3,684 | $3,361 | $3,423 | $3,475^ |
* This is a new measure beginning PY 2000, the first year of WIA. PY 1999
and 2000 performance is explained in Appendix B. ** The adult program did not report employment for its official GPRA goal. ^The goal for PY 2003 reflects increases based upon Assistant Secretary's review. The goal has not been fully negotiated with partners and is therefore subject to change. ETA is in consultation with state and local partners to identify performance accountability issues and the effects of performance on participant services. # This is a new indicator. PY 2002 results will provide a baseline for establishing a goal. |
Adult Formula Grants Budget: The request for FY 2003 is $900,000,000, a decrease of $50,000,000 below the FY 2002 level.
Adult Formula Grants Means and Strategies:
Context: In PY 2003, the WIA Adult program will be starting its fourth year of operation. The strategic goals and means of the previous years provide a context for 2003. In PY 2003, ETA will monitor the states' performance and operations, determine which states are not achieving their performance goals, and provide customized technical assistance. ETA will also prepare recommendations and reports regarding the re-authorization of WIA.
a. Strategies to improve the Adult program components of participant assessment, case management, eligibility determination, informed customer choice, and customized and responsive services involve using several means to assess current practices, identify promising examples, and develop methods for bridging gaps between current and exemplary practice. Through collaborative assessments, ETA and State and local partners will determine appropriate means of improving the aforementioned components, identify key risk areas, and work intensively with those areas with specific needs. Demonstration projects will be supported to implement more effective practices in some States and areas. By the end of PY 2003, a large majority of States and local areas will be providing sophisticated customized employment and training services at One-Stop Centers, through internet web centers, and with business, community-based, and faith-based partners' support.
b. The strategy to improve the performance accountability system will parallel the process to improve the program components. ETA staff in national and regional offices will monitor the reports' timeliness and validity to determine which States meet the standard level of confidence; for those States which do not meet the standard, ETA will develop and provide customized technical assistance to assure they meet the standards. These efforts will provide a more reliable, valid, and accurate reporting system and assure more credible reporting to Congress and the public. During PY 2002, a joint workgroup is to review the performance accountability system for adults. The group's reports will serve as the basis for ETA consideration of improvements to the reporting and accountability systems. Improvements in the timeliness of data are expected to be implemented late in 2002, for applications in 2003. This menu will include measures on impact of customers served, broader customer satisfaction, comparisons benchmarked with related One-Stop Centers and competition. Potential improvements will be considered for inclusion in the recommendations for WIA reauthorization to the Congress. If approved and implemented, these changes will enable the Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training to better measure and justify the program's impact, value, and benefits to Congress and the public. (1.1A)
Welfare-to-Work
Performance and Goals
Goal
1.1B: Increase the retention and earnings of Welfare-to-Work
participants placed in unsubsidized employment.
|
|||||||
Indicator | Targeted Population | Program | 1999 Performance | 2000 Performance | 2001 Performance | 2002 Goal | 2003 Goal |
Retention in unsubsidized employment for two consecutive quarters following the placement quarter | Long-term TANF Recipients, noncustodial parents, and other individuals with barriers to self-sufficiency | Welfare- to-Work | * | 84% | 49% | 60%~ | 60%~ |
Increase in average earnings by second consecutive quarter following the placement quarter | Long-term TANF Recipients, noncustodial parents, and other individuals with barriers to self-sufficiency | Welfare-to-Work | * | 59%^ | 53% | N/A | N/A |
*This is
a new goal beginning in FY 2000. Beginning in FY 2002, ETA will
focus on retention for GPRA reporting purposes. ^For FY 2000, the 84 percent retention rate and the 59 percent earnings increase rate are likely to be inflated due to misinterpretations of the reporting guidance by a number of grantees. ~The FY 2001 data used as the baseline for the FY 2002 and 2003 goals reflect revisions to WtW reporting which were implemented to improve data quality and accuracy. The FY 2002 and 2003 goals reflect realistic but ambitious expectations for grantee performance. While ETA does not anticipate any further changes to this goal, it will review the data submitted in FY 2002 to determine if any changes to the FY 2003 goal are appropriate. |
Wagner-Peyser Act and America's Job Bank
Performance
and Goals
Goal 1.1C: Improve the
outcomes for job seekers and employers who receive public labor
exchange services (DOL 1.1B)
|
|||||||
Indicator | Targeted Population | Program | PY 2000 Performance | PY 2001 Goal | PY 2002 Goal | PY 2003 Goal | |
Job seekers registered with the public labor exchange will enter employment with a new employer by the end of the second quarter following registration (DOL 1.1B)* | Job Seekers | Wagner-Peyser Act | N/A | N/A* | 55% | 58% | |
Job seekers registered with the public labor exchange will continue to be employed two quarters after initial entry into employment with a new employer (DOL 1.1B)* | Job Seekers | Wagner-Peyser Act | N/A* | N/A* | 70% | 72% | |
Increase in the total number of job openings listed with the public labor exchange (with both State Workforce Agencies and America's Job Bank) (DOL 1.1B) | Employers | Wagner-Peyser Act/One- Stop | +21% | + 15% | > PY 2001 | +5% above PY 2001, adjusted for economic conditions | |
Increase in the number of employers that register with America's Job Bank (DOL 1.1B)* | Employers | America's Job Bank | † | 236,400 (total) 10% increase | N/A | 286,000 (total) 10% increase | |
Increase the number of job searches conducted from America's Job Bank by 5% a year (DOL 1.1B)* | Job Seekers | America's Job Bank | à | à | à | 195.4 million (+5%) | |
Increase the number of resume searches conducted from America's Job Bank by 5% a year (DOL 1.1B)* | Employers | America's Job Bank | » | » | » | 9.45 million (+5%) | |
* This is a new goal for PY 2003. |
Wagner-Peyser Act (Employment
Service/One Stop Centers) and America's Job Bank Budget:
Employment Service/One Stop:
|
|||||||
Indicator | Targeted Population | Program | 1999 Performance | 2000 Performance | 2001 Performance | 2002 Goal | 2003 Goal |
Increase in number of new apprenticeship programs over established baseline. | Employer and Labor Entities | Apprenticeship Training | N/A | N/A | N/A* | 10% | 23% |
Increase in number of new businesses involved in apprenticeship over established baseline. | Employers | Apprenticeship Training | N/A | N/A | N/A* | 10% | 23% |
Increase in number of new apprentices over established baseline. | New Apprentices | Apprenticeship Training | N/A | N/A | N/A* | 10% | 27% |
Increase in number of new programs in new and emerging industries – at minimum Information Technology, Health Care and Social Services – over established baseline. | Employer and Labor Entities | Apprenticeship Training | N/A | N/A | N/A* | 10% | 20% |
* This is a new goal. ETA will establish a baseline for each indicator using the average of FY 1999, 2000 and 2001 data. ETA is moving toward 4-year goals, as explained in Appendix B. |
Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor Services Means and Strategies:
Goal 1.1E: Increase the capacity and quality of One-Stop system services for people with disabilities who are registered in the workforce investment area(s) receiving Work Incentive Grants Goal 1.1F: Increase employment and positive outcomes of adults registered under the Indian and Native American Program Goal 1.1G: Increase employment opportunities for senior citizens participating in the Senior Community Service Employment Program |
|||||||
Indicator | Targeted Population | Program | PY 1999 Performance | PY 2000 Performance | PY 2001 Goal | PY 2002 Goal | PY 2003 Goal |
Percent more individuals with disabilities served than were served in the workforce area(s) in the previous program year under the adult, dislocated worker and youth programs (1.1E) | People with disabilities | Work Incentive Grants | * | N/A | N/A | 5% | 5% |
Of those with disabilities, percent more individuals with disabilities placed in unsubsidized employment after program exit than were placed in the previous program year (1.1E) | People with disabilities | Work Incentive Grants | * | N/A | N/A | 5% | 5% |
Of those placed in the first quarter after program exit, percent more individuals with disabilities employed in the third quarter after exit than were retained in the previous program year (1.1E) | People with disabilities | Work Incentive Grants | * | N/A | N/A | 5% | 5% |
Increase in average earnings change for individuals with disabilities over the average earnings change for individuals with disabilities in the previous program year (1.1E) | People with disabilities | Work Incentive Grants | * | N/A | N/A | $250 | $250 |
Employment at program exit (1.1F) | Indian and Native American Adults | Indian and Native American Program | 51.9%^ | ^ | 54% | 56% | 56% |
Positive outcomes at program exit (1.1F) | Indian and Native American Adults | Indian and Native American Program | 83.4%^ | ^ | 84% | 86% | 86% |
Percent of participants placed and retained in unsubsidized employment (1.1G) | Senior Citizens | Senior Community Service Employment Program | 36.5% | 33.8% | 26% | 37%+ | 37%+ |
* This
is a new initiative. 23 Grants were issued in PY 2000, so
there is not any performance information for PY 1999. The
indicators listed are new for PY 2002 and PY 2003. ^ This goal was revised with the passage of WIA. The PY 1999 performance results reported are for JTPA . + The indicator is effective beginning with PY 2002. The prior indicator was the ratio of unsubsidized placements to authorized positions. |
Customer Satisfaction
Performance
and Goals
Goal 1.1H:
Increase customer satisfaction with services received from
workforce investment activities in connection with the One-Stop
delivery system
|
|||||||
Indicator | Targeted Population | Program | PY 1999 Performance | PY 2000 Performance | PY 2001 Goal | PY 2002 Goal | PY2003 Goal |
Score of participant satisfaction with services on the American Customer Satisfaction Index. | Registered participants in WIA Activities | WIA Adult and Youth Activities | * | 78 | 69 | 70 | 71^ |
Score of employer satisfaction with services on the American Customer Satisfaction Index. | Employers | WIA Adult and Youth Activities | * | 71 | 66 | 68 | 69^ |
*This
is a new WIA goal based upon a weighted average of negotiated
levels of performance for all States. ^The PY 2003 goals have not yet been negotiated with the States, so the goal reflected is preliminary and continues the trend established by the PY 2000 – 2002 goals. |
A
PREPARED WORKFORCE
Outcome Goal 1.2: Increase Number of Youth Making a Successful Transition to a Career Path Programs Include: Job Corps Youth Activities Formula Grants Indian and Native American Youth Youth Opportunity Grants
Total
Budget: $2,550,625,000 |
Youth Formula Grants
Performance and Goals
Goal 1.2A:
Increase entrance and retention of youth registered under
the WIA youth program in education or employment (DOL 1.2A)
|
|||||||
Indicator | Targeted Population | Program | PY 2000 Performance | PY 2001 Goal | PY 2002 Goal | PY 2003 Goal | |
Of the 14-18 year-old youth who enter the program without a diploma or equivalent, the percent who will attain a secondary school diploma or equivalent by the first quarter after exit (DOL 1.2A) | Disadvantaged Youth Aged 14-18 | WIA Youth Program | * | N/A | 51% | 52% | |
Employed in the first quarter after program exit (DOL 1.2A) | Disadvantaged Youth Aged 19-21 | WIA Youth Program | ^ | ^ | 63% | 65% | |
Retention in employment in the third quarter after exit of those who were employed in the quarter after program exit (DO1.2A) | Disadvantaged Youth Aged 19-21 | WIA Youth Program | 77% | 70% | 77% | 78% | |
^ This was a new goal for Program Year 2002. |
Cross-Cutting Programs
and Issues
ETA will facilitate the involvement of Faith-Based organizations,
as partners, to expand educational, cultural, recreational and
career opportunities for youth.
Job
Corps
Performance and Goals
1.2B: Increase participation, retention, and earnings of Job Corps graduates
in employment or education (DOL 1.2B)
Indicator |
Targeted Population> |
Program |
PY 2000 Performance |
PY 2001 Goal |
PY 2002 Goal |
PY 2003 Goal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graduates
who enter employment or enroll in education |
Severely
Disadvantaged Youth |
Job
Corps |
85% |
85% |
90% |
N/A* |
Increase
number of students who earn diplomas |
Severely
Disadvantaged Youth |
Job
Corps |
N/A* |
N/A* |
+
20% over PY 2001 |
+
20% over PY 2002 |
Average
hourly wage at entered employment |
Severely
Disadvantaged Youth |
Job
Corps |
$7.97 |
$7.25 |
$8.20 |
N/A* |
Six
month retention in employment or education |
Severely
Disadvantaged Youth |
Job
Corps |
67%
(90 day retention) |
70% |
70% |
70% |
Average
hourly wage at six months retention in employment or education |
Severely
Disadvantaged Youth |
Job
Corps |
N/A* |
N/A* |
N/A* |
$8.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Job
Corps program emphasis has shifted from short-term results
to long-term outcomes. PY 2003 goals have changed to reflect
increased emphasis on high school credentialing and greater
wage opportunities, leading to graduates' long-term employability.
| |
As part of its continuous
improvement effort, ETA will strive to increase the number of
high school diplomas that students attain while enrolled in Job
Corps as a means to enhance educational credentials and career
opportunities. ETA's strategy to increase high school diploma
attainment will proceed in these key areas:
Youth
Opportunity Grants
Performance and Goals
1.2 C: Increase employment
and retention of youth registered under the WIA youth program
in education or employment(DOL 1.2C)
Indicator |
Targeted Population |
Program |
PY 2000 Performance |
PY 2001 Goal |
PY 2002 Goal |
PY 2003 Goal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attain
a secondary school diploma or equivalent by the first quarter
after exit |
At
Risk Youth, Aged 14-18, Living in High Poverty Areas |
Youth
Opportunity Grants |
* |
^ |
51% |
52% |
In
employment by the first quarter after exit |
At
Risk Youth, Aged 19-21, Living in High Poverty Areas |
Youth
Opportunity Grants |
* |
^ |
63% |
65% |
Retention
in employment in the third quarter after exit of those who
were employed in the quarter after program exit |
At
Risk Youth, Aged 19-21, Living in High Poverty Areas |
Youth
Opportunity Grants |
* |
70% |
77% |
78% |
^
This is a new goal for Program Year 2002. |
* Program Year 2000 data is unavailable at this time. |
Indian
and Native American Program
Performance and Goals
Goal 1.2D: Increase
the skill attainment, work readiness and employment of youth
registered under the Indian and Native American Program
Indicator |
Targeted Population |
Program |
PY 1999 Performance |
PY 2000 Performance |
PY 2001 Goal |
PY 2002 Goal |
PY 2003 Goal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attain
at least two goals relating to basic skills, work readiness,
skill attainment, entered employment and skill training (1.2D)
|
Native
American Youth |
Indian
and Native American Program |
+ |
* |
60% |
61% |
61% |
Earn
a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent (GED)
(1.2D) |
Native
American Youth |
Indian
and Native American Program |
+ |
* |
65% |
66% |
66% |
+This
is a new goal. No prior program data available. |
* Preliminary data are expected March 2002. |
A SECURE
WORKFORCE
Outcome Goal 2.2: Protect worker benefitsUnemployment Compensation Foreign Labor Certification Trade Adjustment Assistance/NAFTA-TAA Benefits Total Budget: $ 3,063,228,000
|
Unemployment Insurance
Performance
and Goals
2.2A Make
timely and accurate benefit payments to and facilitate the
reemployment of Unemployed Workers and set up Unemployment
Insurance (UI) tax accounts promptly for new employers
Indicator |
Targeted
Population |
2000
Performance |
2001
Goal |
2002
Goal |
2003 Goal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve
payment timeliness · Percent of intrastate payments made within
14-21 days |
Unemployed
Workers |
N/A |
N/A |
91% |
91% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve
Payment Accuracy nationwide |
· Benefit payment accuracy rate Unemployed
Workers |
N/A |
N/A |
Establish
a baseline |
± |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilitate
reemployment |
· Increase the entered employment rate of Unemployment Insurance claimants Unemployed
Workers |
N/A |
N/A |
Establish
a baseline |
± |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set
up Unemployment Insurance Tax Accounts Promptly |
· Percent of new employers who are issued a determination about their Unemployment Insurance tax liability within 90 days of the end of the first quarter they become liable for the tax New
Employers |
N/A |
N/A |
80% |
80% |
These
goals will be articulated once ETA obtains stakeholder feed
back in defining the indicators and the baselines are established.
|
|
Foreign
Labor Certification
Performance and Goals
2.2B Promptly
review employer applications for foreign labor certifications
|
|||||||
Indicator | 2001 Performance | 2001 Goal | 2002 Goal | 2003 Goal | |||
Promptly process employer labor condition applications for the H-1B professional/specialty temporary program. (2.2B) | N/A | N/A | 95% processed within seven days of receipt | 95% processed within seven days of receipt | |||
Promptly review employer applications for foreign labor certifications to ensure that aliens admitted to work under foreign labor certifications will not adversely affect domestic workers' wages or working conditions. Reduce the average time required in the ETA Regional Offices to process applications received under the new PERM process for permanent alien residency. (2.2B) | N/A | N/A | N/A | Reduce average processing time to six months for the new PERM process |
Foreign Labor Certification Means & Strategies
A
SECURE WORKFORCE
Outcome
Goal 2.3: Increase Employment and Earnings for
Retrained
Workers
Programs
Include:
WIA
Dislocated Worker Formula and National Reserve
Trade
Adjustment Assistance/NAFTA-TAA Training
Total Budget: $1,514,690,000
|
Dislocated Worker Formula Grants
Performance and Goals
Goal 2.3A: Increase the employment, retention, and earnings replacement of individuals registered under the WIA dislocated worker program (DOL 2.3A) |
|||||||
Indicator | Targeted Population | Program | PY 1999 Performance | PY 2000 Performance | PY 2001 Goal | PY 2002 Goal | PY 2003 Goal |
Employed in the first quarter after program exit | Dislocated Workers | WIA Dislocated Worker Program | * | 75% | 73% | 78% | 78%^ |
Retention in employment in the third quarter after program exit of those who were employed in the first quarter after program exit | Dislocated Workers | WIA Dislocated Worker Program | * | 83% | 83% | 88% | 88%^ |
Earnings replacement rate for those employed in the first quarter after program exit and still employed in the third quarter after program exit | Dislocated Workers | WIA Dislocated Worker Program | * | 95% | 91% | 98% | 98%^ |
* This
is a new measure beginning with PY 2000. ^Goals for PY 2002 and PY 2003 have not been fully negotiated with partners and are therefore subject to change. ETA is in consultation with state and local partners to identify performance accountability issues and the effects of performance on participant services. |
Trade
Adjustment Assistance/NAFTA-TAA Training
Performance and Goals
Goal 2.3B: Increase the employment, retention, and earnings replacement of workers dislocated in important part because of trade and who receive trade adjustment assistance benefits (DOL 2.3B) Indicator |
Targeted Population |
Program |
1999 Performance |
2000 Performance |
2001 Performance |
2002 Goal |
2003 Goal |
Employed
in the first quarter after program exit |
Dislocated
Workers |
Trade
Adjustment Assistance |
+ |
65%1 |
66% |
78% |
78% |
Retention
in employment in the third quarter after program exit of those
who were employed in the first quarter after program exit |
Dislocated
Workers |
Trade
Adjustment Assistance |
+ |
+ |
90% |
88% |
88% |
Earnings
replacement rate for those employed in the first quarter after
program exit and still employed in the third quarter after program
exit |
Dislocated
Workers |
Trade
Adjustment Assistance |
+ |
107%2 |
88% |
90% |
90% |
+ This is
a new goal, which conforms to WIA and aligns more closely with
the dislocated worker goal. FY 2001 constitutes the baseline year. |
1 The low reemployment percentage for FY 2000 is believed to be due to data reliability problems. This theory was tested by looking at wage record data for terminees reported as unemployed in eight States. This analysis significantly raised the number of workers reemployed in those States. Incorporating the higher number for workers reemployed from the eight States in the National figures raises the overall reemployment rate to 74.8%. It should be noted that wage record data will be used in all future Trade Act Participant Reports (TAPR). 2 The significantly high earnings replacement rate is also due to data reliability problems. It should be noted that wage record data will be used in all future TAPR reporting. |
Previous | Next |