Midcourse Review  >  Table of Contents  > Focus Area 6: Disability and Secondary Conditions  >  Disparities Table

Figure 6-2. Disparities Table for Focus Area 6: Disability and Secondary Conditions
Disparities from the best group rate for each characteristic at the most recent data point and changes in disparity from the baseline to the most recent data point.



Characteristics: Race and Ethnicity
Population-based objectives American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Native Hawaiian
or other
Pacific Islander
Two or more races Hispanic or Latino Black non-Hispanic White non-Hispanic Summary index
6-2. Sadness or depression: 4-17 years with
disabilities (1997, 2003)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.Baseline data by race and ethnicity are for 1999.,Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Most favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Data not available.
6-3. Negative feelings interfering with activities:
18+ years with disabilities (1997, 2003)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders.
Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.50-99 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rateLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
6-4. Social participation: 18+ years with
disabilities (2001)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Most favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rateLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
6-5. Sufficient emotional support: 18+ years
with disabilities (2001)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
50-99 percent difference from the best group rateLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
6-6. Satisfaction with life: 18+ years with
disabilities (2001)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Most favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rateLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
6-8. Employment parity: 18-64 with disabilities (1997, 2003)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.Data are for Asians or Pacific Islanders. Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
6-10. Access to health and wellness programs: 18+ years with disabilities (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Data not available.10-49 percent difference from the best group rateData not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant50-99 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
6-11. No assistive devices and technology:
18+ years with disabilities (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantMost favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
6-12a. Environmental barriers at home:
18+ years with disabilities (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.50-99 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 50-99 percent difference from the best group rate
6-12b. Environmental barriers at school:
18+ years with disabilities (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.
6-12c. Environmental barriers at work:
18+ years with disabilities (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
6-12d. Environmental barriers to community
activities: 18+ years with disabilities (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.100 percent or more percent difference from the best group rateMost favorable group rate for specified characteristic, but reliability criterion not met. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 50-99 percent difference from the best group rate

Notes:

Data for objectives 6-1, 6-7a and b, 6-9, and 6-13a through h are unavailable or not applicable.

Years in parentheses represent the baseline data year and the most recent data year (if available).

Disparity from the best group rate is defined as the percent difference between the best group rate and each of the other group rates for a characteristic (for example, race and ethnicity). The summary index is the average of these percent differences for a characteristic. Change in disparity is estimated by subtracting the disparity at baseline from the disparity at the most recent data point. Change in the summary index is estimated by subtracting the summary index at baseline from the summary index at the most recent data point. See Technical Appendix for more information.







<<  Previous—Progress Quotient Chart    |   Table of Contents   |   Next—Disparities Table: Gender and Education  >>


[ Top ]