Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Florida 4 (Ander Crenshaw)
(FY 2007)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2007
Total dollars: $641,976,011
The amount for this search is 0.1% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 156 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 431
Total number of transactions: 7,969
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$349,809,656
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$23,687,050
Competition within a limited pool$147,025,075
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$1,781,589
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$49,337,198
Not competed for an allowable reason$25,340,100
Not identified, soon to be addressed$44,995,343

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Florida 4 (Ander Crenshaw)$231,855,336
Florida 11 (Jim Davis / Kathy Castor)$43,509,453
North Carolina 2 (Bob Etheridge)$34,853,950
Virginia 2 (Thelma D. Drake)$31,790,750
Maryland 5 (Steny H. Hoyer)$24,710,452

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Miscellaneous Buildings$103,514,504
 Non-nuclear Ship Repair (East) Ship repair (including overhauls and conversions) performed on non-nuclear propelled and nonpropelled ships east of the 108th meridian$87,101,627
 Operation of Government-Owned Facilities -- Other Non-Building Facilities$48,518,208
 Maintenance, Repair or Alteration of Real Property -- Other Airfield Structures$38,724,071
 Maintenance, Repair or Alteration of Real Property -- Miscellaneous Buildings$31,840,267

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NAVY, Department of the$301,364,826
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$154,680,913
Maritime Administration$49,790,774
VETERANS AFFAIRS, Department of$32,514,005
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$28,190,651

Top 10 Contractors

 Sauer Holdings, Inc.$230,617,921
 Crowley Maritime Corporation$49,022,353
 Atlantic Marine Holding Co$46,257,704
 Earl Industries, L.L.C.$34,987,247
 L. C. Gaskins Construction Co., Inc.$26,209,138
 CDI Corp.$22,060,328
 Warden Construction Corp$15,551,426
 Qc Management, Inc.$15,236,211
 Landstar System, Inc.$14,667,349
 Sarvis Associates, Inc$14,537,887

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$0
2001$0
2002$0
2003$0
2004$382,023,084
2005$462,765,698
2006$561,027,630
2007$641,976,011
2008$546,127,392
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$148,946,968


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 13, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.