Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in California 53 (Susan A. Davis)
(FY 2005)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2005
Total dollars: $2,156,794,191
The amount for this search is 0.6% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 31 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 410
Total number of transactions: 9,656
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$893,563,259
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$671,230,251
Competition within a limited pool$190,624,045
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$9,417,926
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$29,356,960
Not competed for an allowable reason$138,066,354
Not identified, soon to be addressed$224,535,398

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Alabama 5 (Robert E. (Bud) Cramer Jr.)$218,483,558
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$157,330,339
California 53 (Susan A. Davis)$98,712,698
Georgia 13 (David Scott)$46,885,171
Virginia 1 (Jo Ann Davis)$37,460,534

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 ADP Facility Operation and Maintenance Services$334,059,574
 Non-nuclear Ship Repair (West) Ship repair (including overhauls and conversions) performed on. non-nuclear propelled and nonpropelled ships west of the 108th meridian$240,074,943
 Other ADP and Telecommunications Services (includes data storage on tapes, compact disks, etc.)$150,393,511
 Other Management Support Services$147,573,628
 Other Professional Services$105,381,282

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NAVY, Department of the$501,459,993
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION$321,027,018
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$260,422,620
Federal Technology Service$246,059,429
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$185,716,764

Top 10 Contractors

 Saic, Inc.$1,244,331,075
 Bae Systems PLC$248,998,045
 L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.$154,154,183
 Harper Construction Company, Inc.$82,040,622
 United Technologies Corporation$49,299,436
 The Shaw Group Inc$33,640,054
 General Atomic Technologies Corporation$29,776,506
 Cubic Corporation$23,468,653
 Epsilon Systems Solution, Inc.$23,286,555
 Blue Tech Inc.$17,649,692

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$0
2001$0
2002$0
2003$0
2004$2,020,226,231
2005$2,156,794,191
2006$1,962,577,486
2007$2,432,117,260
2008$3,063,081,549
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$751,234,308


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 13, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.