Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Washington
(FY 2005)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2005
Total dollars: $6,040,906,538
The amount for this search is 1.6% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This state is ranked 18 among states for this year.
Total number of contractors: 4,568
Total number of transactions: 51,592
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$2,498,491,983
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$1,118,112,271
Competition within a limited pool$782,463,750
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$38,678,975
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$311,779,467
Not competed for an allowable reason$1,155,860,921
Not identified, soon to be addressed$135,519,171

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Washington 7 (Jim McDermott)$209,049,006
Alaska At Large (Don Young)$154,612,850
Washington 5 (George R. Nethercutt Jr. / Cathy McMorris)$37,974,065
Washington 6 (Norman D. Dicks)$36,797,914
Washington 1 (Jay Inslee)$35,814,117

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 Operation of Government-Owned Facilities -- Restoration of real property$1,185,677,489
 Environmental Sciences -- Basic Research (R&D)$620,432,197
 Aircraft, Fixed Wing$445,110,666
 Weapons -- Advanced Development (R&D)$364,587,836
 Non-nuclear Ship Repair (West) Ship repair (including overhauls and conversions) performed on. non-nuclear propelled and nonpropelled ships west of the 108th meridian$187,341,198

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

ENERGY, Department of$1,866,875,827
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$1,211,567,092
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$830,228,987
NAVY, Department of the$749,971,142
Defense Logistics Agency$435,957,304

Top 10 Contractors

 The Boeing Company$1,286,482,767
 Fluor Corporation$776,821,545
 Battelle Memorial Institute Inc$636,929,034
 Ch2m Hill Companies, Ltd.$399,494,657
 Todd Shipyards Corporation$175,471,762
 Cubic Corporation$174,088,849
 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.$115,394,645
 Compagnie Nationale . Portefeuille SA$100,767,129
 Saltchuk Resources, Inc.$73,155,275
 Jkt-Alliance, A Tribal 8 (a) Joint Venture$72,712,573

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$3,305,764,350
2001$3,718,195,229
2002$4,034,560,191
2003$4,474,249,317
2004$5,258,620,166
2005$6,040,906,538
2006$5,313,311,685
2007$5,942,577,246
2008$6,753,463,275
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$3,802,140,585


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 12, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.