Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Massachusetts
(FY 2005)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2005
Total dollars: $11,327,136,035
The amount for this search is 2.9% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This state is ranked 6 among states for this year.
Total number of contractors: 3,852
Total number of transactions: 125,588
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$2,783,936,509
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$1,421,265,841
Competition within a limited pool$1,220,983,488
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$141,056,304
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$416,956,275
Not competed for an allowable reason$5,044,939,175
Not identified, soon to be addressed$297,998,444

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Massachusetts 6 (John F. Tierney)$352,352,675
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$244,199,041
Massachusetts 5 (Martin T. Meehan)$195,515,039
Massachusetts 8 (Michael E. Capuano)$189,914,576
Massachusetts 4 (Barney Frank)$80,523,450

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 Gas Turbines and Jet Engines, Aircraft; Prime Moving, and Components$1,111,233,428
 Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Automatic Data Processing Equipment (Including Firmware), Software, Supplies and Support Equipment$551,792,545
 Guided Missile Components$382,813,361
 Defense Electronics and Communication Equipment -- Operational Systems Development (R&D)$372,987,462
 Miscellaneous Communication Equipment$335,751,469

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$2,924,444,823
NAVY, Department of the$2,880,235,245
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$2,627,767,849
Defense Logistics Agency$377,749,446
Missile Defense Agency$264,545,997

Top 10 Contractors

 Raytheon Company$2,252,116,218
 General Dynamics Corporation$2,097,170,143
 General Electric Company$1,211,020,494
 Massachusetts Institute of Technology$648,425,957
 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Inc$294,816,553
 The Mitre Corporation$275,321,549
 Perini Corporation$200,970,655
 L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.$192,105,480
 Textron Inc.$168,783,707
 Lockheed Martin Corporation$145,179,322

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$6,307,949,050
2001$6,974,383,694
2002$7,004,453,183
2003$8,430,638,920
2004$9,827,745,428
2005$11,327,136,035
2006$11,866,920,917
2007$13,947,593,683
2008$15,825,497,076
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$4,207,762,464


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 12, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.