Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Colorado
(FY 2004)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2004
Total dollars: $5,532,154,282
The amount for this search is 1.6% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This state is ranked 19 among states for this year.
Total number of contractors: 3,106
Total number of transactions: 25,172
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$2,743,918,345
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$538,717,185
Competition within a limited pool$1,341,610,169
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$180,912,640
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$227,493,248
Not competed for an allowable reason$442,613,089
Not identified, soon to be addressed$56,889,607

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

Colorado 5 (Joel Hefley)$111,055,664
Colorado 1 (Diana DeGette)$63,031,027
Alaska At Large (Don Young)$60,107,205
Colorado 2 (Mark Udall)$45,657,262
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$43,323,945

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 Space Vehicles$535,850,312
 Other ADP and Telecommunications Services (includes data storage on tapes, compact disks, etc.)$378,617,186
 Defense Electronics and Communication Equipment -- Operational Systems Development (R&D)$183,855,207
 Operation of Government-Owned Facilities -- Government-Owned Contractor-Operated (GOCO) R&D Facilities$164,036,892
 Architect - Engineer Services (including landscaping, interior layout, and designing)$143,903,265

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$2,021,870,317
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$1,223,484,418
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION$332,108,380
NAVY, Department of the$246,285,892
ENERGY, Department of$224,203,209

Top 10 Contractors

 Lockheed Martin Corporation$1,258,021,801
 ITT Corporation$672,335,071
 Ch2m Hill Companies, Ltd.$368,804,471
 Ball Corporation$227,318,753
 Hensel Phelps Construction Co$154,748,739
 Honeywell International Inc.$143,141,755
 Northrop Grumman Corporation$142,866,698
 Harris Corporation$84,114,275
 The Gary-Williams Company$59,231,153
 Berkshire Hathaway, Inc$57,941,647

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$4,210,183,028
2001$4,434,430,347
2002$4,067,373,354
2003$5,064,190,461
2004$5,532,154,282
2005$6,011,916,821
2006$7,820,754,925
2007$8,500,303,127
2008$9,726,240,633
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$3,706,997,959


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 12, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.