Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Oklahoma
(FY 2003)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2003
Total dollars: $1,983,044,380
The amount for this search is 0.7% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This state is ranked 33 among states for this year.
Total number of contractors: 947
Total number of transactions: 9,205
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$842,103,023
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$303,440,127
Competition within a limited pool$264,950,555
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$74,425,751
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$292,173,029
Not competed for an allowable reason$204,837,744
Not identified, soon to be addressed$1,114,152

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$15,240,849
Delaware At Large (Michael N. Castle)$5,265,224
Alaska At Large (Don Young)$4,818,415
South Dakota At Large (John R. Thune / William J. Janklow)$2,174,806
Oklahoma 4 (J. C. Watts Jr. / Tom Cole)$1,188,274

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Aircraft and Airframe Structural Components$147,602,348
 Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Aircraft Components and Accessories$121,021,126
 Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Penal Facilities$107,426,245
 Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Ground Effect Vehicles, Motor Vehicles, Trailers, and Cycles$83,332,075
 Aircraft, Fixed Wing$76,697,411

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$828,801,594
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$418,790,950
NAVY, Department of the$140,803,683
Bureau of Prisoners/Federal Prison System$117,569,604
ENERGY, Department of$56,313,945

Top 10 Contractors

 The Boeing Company$305,698,348
 L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.$290,096,345
 URS Corporation$140,635,000
 Flint Resources Company LLC$115,270,823
 Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma$56,935,293
 Chickasaw Nation$55,059,754
 Infrasource Transmission Services Company$53,691,138
 Wyandotte Tribal Petroleum, Inc$40,143,870
 The Ross Group Construction Corporation$33,331,051
 Tiger Natural Gas, Inc.$32,526,832

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$1,378,624,183
2001$1,421,688,367
2002$1,544,332,373
2003$1,983,044,380
2004$2,483,003,261
2005$2,508,613,237
2006$2,606,515,009
2007$2,555,656,150
2008$2,610,626,433
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$715,073,288


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 12, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.