Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Massachusetts
(FY 2003)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2003
Total dollars: $8,430,638,920
The amount for this search is 2.8% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This state is ranked 7 among states for this year.
Total number of contractors: 2,348
Total number of transactions: 28,931
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$2,289,452,451
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$863,468,308
Competition within a limited pool$887,816,146
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$576,272,284
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$448,915,139
Not competed for an allowable reason$3,318,599,509
Not identified, soon to be addressed$46,115,082

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$101,054,768
Massachusetts 4 (Barney Frank)$91,516,811
Guam nonvoting (Robert A. Underwood / Madeleine Z. Bordallo)$70,837,845
Maryland 8 (Constance A. Morella / Chris Van Hollen)$39,848,381
Massachusetts 10 (William D. Delahunt)$28,576,731

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 Gas Turbines and Jet Engines, Aircraft; Prime Moving, and Components$1,281,423,162
 Other Research and Development -- Advanced Development (R&D)$457,772,750
 Engineering and Technical Services$261,792,009
 Fire Control Transmitting and Receiving Equipment, except Airborne$247,820,962
 Other Research and Development -- Engineering Development (R&D)$185,219,617

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NAVY, Department of the$2,613,655,059
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$2,057,512,785
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$1,527,106,469
Federal Technology Service$342,571,694
Defense Logistics Agency$239,151,506

Top 10 Contractors

 General Electric Company$1,487,132,380
 Raytheon Company$1,304,943,128
 General Dynamics Corporation$1,066,480,197
 Massachusetts Institute of Technology$476,062,345
 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Inc$204,469,496
 Lockheed Martin Corporation$198,614,992
 The Mitre Corporation$185,071,598
 Textron Inc.$171,679,208
 Dynamics Research Corporation$165,499,413
 Crane & Co., Inc.$130,971,304

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$6,307,949,050
2001$6,974,383,694
2002$7,004,453,183
2003$8,430,638,920
2004$9,827,745,428
2005$11,327,136,035
2006$11,866,920,917
2007$13,947,593,683
2008$15,825,497,076
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$4,207,762,464


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 12, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.