Masthead: Home Link

 Switch to Purchase Cards
Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

USAspending.gov was last updated on May 1, 2009..

Contracts data is up-to-date as of April 17, 2009 for all 24 CFO Act agencies.

Assistance (Grants/Other & Loans) data is up-to-date as of April 24, 2009 for 20 of 22 CFO Act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies:DOJ, USTREAS

For more details, please click here

Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in North Carolina
(FY 2001)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2001
Total dollars: $2,285,950,576
The amount for this search is 1.0% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This state is ranked 24 among states for this year.
Total number of contractors: 1,606
Total number of transactions: 11,364
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$1,485,438,166
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was received$169,650,339
Competition within a limited pool$300,021,110
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$3,336,598
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$177,122,432
Not competed for an allowable reason$149,987,766
Not identified, soon to be addressed$394,166

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$136,920,113
Puerto Rico nonvoting (Carlos A. Romero-Barcelo / Anibal Acevedo-Vila)$15,868,632
Montana At Large (Rick Hill / Dennis R. Rehberg)$3,191,663
Guam nonvoting (Robert A. Underwood)$2,867,796
North Dakota At Large (Earl Pomeroy)$1,761,466

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

 Administrative and Service Buildings$207,396,775
 Other ADP and Telecommunications Services (includes data storage on tapes, compact disks, etc.)$129,083,217
 Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Other Administrative Facilities and Service Buildings$85,728,859
 Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Miscellaneous Buildings$65,019,096
 Facilities Operations Support Services$63,963,664

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NAVY, Department of the$501,673,396
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$248,592,314
Public Buildings Service$234,024,117
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$206,970,480
Defense Logistics Agency$170,765,130

Top 10 Contractors

 J.A. Jones, Inc$196,462,636
 J A Jones Construction Company$192,755,148
 Research Triangle Institute Inc$145,024,322
 J A Jones Management Services Inc$98,713,622
 Alcatel Lucent$97,772,064
 MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN CONTRACTORS$83,555,000
 University of North Carolina System$49,849,994
 Nana Regional Corporation, Inc.,$49,185,901
 Sierra Holdings Corp.$49,025,835
 The Shaw Group Inc$46,490,974

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$1,934,959,819
2001$2,285,950,576
2002$2,366,141,077
2003$2,642,438,037
2004$2,800,598,126
2005$3,848,125,153
2006$3,795,421,537
2007$4,131,416,602
2008$4,002,589,919
2009Agencies started sending Recovery data$1,054,054,985


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on May 12, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.