Interpreting America’s Historic Places
What are the humanities?
According to the 1965 National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act,
“The term 'humanities' includes, but is not limited to, the study of the following: language, both modern and classical; linguistics; literature; history; jurisprudence; philosophy; archaeology; comparative religion; ethics; the history, criticism, and theory of the arts; those aspects of social sciences which have humanistic content and employ humanistic methods; and the study and application of the humanities to the human environment with particular attention to reflecting our diverse heritage, traditions, and history and to the relevance of the humanities to the current conditions of national life.”
If I want the Interpreting America’s Historic Places designation for my project, do I need to use the separate
Interpreting America’s Historic Places guidelines?
Yes. A project cannot be designated by NEH as an
Interpreting America’s Historic Places project unless the proposal is submitted using those separate guidelines.
May I use an Interpreting America’s Historic Places grant to support
preservation activities?
No. America’s Historic Places grants support projects that interpret—not preserve—historic places.
What counts as a “historic place”?
A historic place might be a single historic site, a series of sites, an entire neighborhood, a community or town, or a larger
geographical region.
What makes a historic place “nationally significant”?
A nationally significant place could be:
- a site or definable area where events that played a significant role
in the nation’s history occurred;
- the home of a nationally significant person, family, or group;
- the gathering site of a nationally significant group of people
(e.g., a religious sect, political party, social reform organization);
- a water or land route for trade, travel, communication, or migration in the nation’s history;
- a site or area that played a significant role in the nation’s
economic history (e.g., for industry, agriculture, ranching, shipping,
tourism, logging, or mining);
- a site or area that was home to a significant strain of American
thought, music, literature, architecture, or another aspect of cultural
history; or
- a site or area that is important for understanding significant
themes and issues in American political and social history (e.g., the
American Revolution, immigration, civil rights, education, or public
health).
Should I apply for an Interpreting America’s Historic Places grant or one in the
America’s Historical and Cultural Organizations category?
You should apply for an Interpreting America’s Historic Places grant if:
- the place itself played a significant role in American history;
- the proposed interpretation of the place addresses central themes and issues in American history;
- the project enriches the visitor experience at one or more historic places by linking the story of those places with broader themes in American history; and
- the specific attributes of the place—the site, its location, buildings, or other natural or built features—are an integral part of the proposed story.
How do I know whether my project is more appropriate for the
National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) or the National Endowment for the
Humanities?
If your project involves the creation of musical compositions, dance,
painting, poetry, short stories, novels, or projects that focus on arts
performance or training, then NEA would be a better choice for your
application.
NEH supports projects that provide an analytical, reflective, or
historical perspective on the arts.
May I apply for more than one NEH grant for my
project?
Yes. You may apply to support different phases and activities of your
project. For example, an institution may apply for a preservation grant to
stabilize its collections, a challenge grant to support a capital
improvement program, or a planning or implementation grant to mount an exhibition.
You may apply for planning or implementation grants,
either singly or in sequence, but you may not submit a second proposal for
the same project if the outcome of your prior application is still pending. For
example, if an applicant institution has a planning grant application
pending, it may not apply for an implementation grant for the same project
until it has heard the outcome of the application for the planning grant.
Do I need to apply for a planning grant before I apply for an implementation grant?
No. You may apply for any type of grant—planning or implementation—that is appropriate for the developmental
stage of your project. Although many applicants find it beneficial to obtain planning
funds before applying for implementation, it is not required.
What is a humanities scholar?
Someone who has an advanced degree in a discipline of the humanities is
generally considered a scholar. Scholars can provide context for the
project’s issues and identify relevant humanities themes and ideas.
When should I consult scholars about a project?
As a general rule, the earlier scholars are involved in a project, the
better. Usually projects recommended for funding are ones in which
scholars have helped shape the project’s conceptual framework.
Is it okay to rely on a single scholar for a project?
Projects that depend on input from a single scholar are not as
competitive. Working with a number of scholars allows projects to explore
a diverse range of interpretive possibilities.
How do I find the right scholarly advisors for a
project?
There are a variety of ways to find scholars for your project. Check
with your local college or university to see if any faculty members have
relevant expertise or could suggest the names of other scholars. You can
also peruse bookstores to see who has written about topics related to your
project. State humanities councils often maintain lists of scholars who
have participated in public programs. You can also contact professional
associations or consult published directories of scholars. Finally, ask
for samples of funded projects to see what kinds of scholars have
participated in other projects.
How long does the application review take?
The review for planning and implementation applications normally takes six to seven months.
How long a grant period should I request?
The grant period for planning grants is
normally about twelve months. Implementation projects normally run from
two to three years, although this varies depending on the project.
What if my institution lacks the resources necessary to organize a competitive project?
Applicants are encouraged to collaborate with partner organizations on projects. Partnerships help stretch resources and expand potential audiences for projects.
If I receive NEH funding, may I also accept funding from other
sources?
Yes. Applicants are encouraged to seek funding from diverse sources.
Submitting proposals to other funders has no bearing on how NEH reviews proposals.
We do ask that you tell us about those applications, so that we understand
the project’s funding situation.
May K-12 students participate in Interpreting America’s Historic Places projects?
Yes. Although the general public should be your main audience,
you may feature ancillary programs for K-12 students or prepare curricular
packets for use in schools.
Are program officers available via phone or e-mail to answer
questions?
Yes. Applicants are encouraged to contact a program officer to discuss
applications prior to their submission. Program officers may also look at
drafts of proposals and share samples of previously funded projects. The
staff can be reached at 202-606-8269 or publicpgms@neh.gov.
|