Jump to main content.


Grandfathering Amendment Final Rule

Vol. 59 No. 156 Monday, August 15, 1994  p 41968 (Proposed Rule)   
    1/622   


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 





40 CFR Part 82 





[FRL-5040-5] 





Protection of Stratospheric Ozone; Refrigerant Recycling 





AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).


ACTION: Proposed rule.





SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending 


the rules on refrigerant recycling promulgated under section 


608 of the Clean Air Act to clarify the conditions under which 


technician certification programs would be grandfathered, allowing 


technicians who had participated in voluntary technician training 


and certification programs prior to the publication of the rule 


to receive formal certification. EPA is also proposing to amend 


the rule to clarify the scope of the technician certification 


requirement.





DATES: Written comments on the proposed rule must be received 


by September 14, 1994, unless a hearing is requested by August 


25, 1994. If a hearing is requested, written comments must be 


received by October 3, 1994. If requested, a public hearing 


will be held on September 1, 1994 at 9 a.m. Individuals wishing 


to request a hearing must contact the Stratospheric Ozone Hotline 


at 1-800-296-1996 by August 25, 1994. To find out whether a 


hearing will take place, contact the Stratospheric Ozone Hotline 


between August 26, 1994 and September 1, 1994.





ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted in duplicate to the 


attention of Air Docket No. A-92-01 VIII.A at: Environmental 


Protection Agency, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460. 


The public hearing will be held at Washington Information Center 


(WIC), room 3 North, USEPA, 401 M Street SW., Washington, DC. 


The Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center is located 


in room M-1500, Waterside Mall (Ground Floor) Environmental 


Protection Agency, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460. 


Dockets may be inspected from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday 


through Friday. A reasonable fee may be charged for copying 


docket materials.





FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debbie Ottinger, Program
Implementation 


Branch, Stratospheric Protection Division, Office of Atmospheric 


Programs, Office of Air and Radiation (6205-J), 401 M Street, 


S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460. The Stratospheric Ozone Information 


Hotline at 1-800-296-1996 can also be contacted for further 


information. 





SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 








I. Background 





   Final regulations published on May 14, 1993 (58 FR 28660) 


establish a recycling program for ozone-depleting refrigerants 


recovered during the servicing and disposal of air-conditioning 


and refrigeration equipment. The regulations require technicians 


to observe practices that serve to minimize release of refrigerant 


to the environment. To ensure that technicians become knowledgeable



of these requirements,  82.161 of the final rule mandates that 


technicians be certified by passing a test. For Type II, Type 


III, and Universal technicians, the test must be a closed-book, 


proctored examination drawn from a bank of test questions kept 


by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and administered 


in a secure environment by an EPA-approved certifying program. 


For Type I technicians, a mail-in program is permitted. Testing 


and training organizations can apply to EPA to become EPA-approved 


technician certifiers under  82.161(c) by demonstrating that 


they can ensure test security, provide an adequate number of 


proctors during the examination, select questions randomly from 


the test bank, and provide proof of certification to technicians 


who pass the exams. (The specific requirements of the program 


are presented in  82.161 and appendix D of the final rule.) 


To date, EPA has authorized 66 organizations as technician
certifying 


organizations. 





A. Grandfathering 





   Under  82.161(g), organizations that seek approval as certifying



organizations can also apply to grandfather technicians who 


received training and testing under programs established prior 


to promulgation of the final rule (which established the approval 


process for certification programs). Specifically,  82.161(g) 


states: 


   ``Persons seeking approval of a technician certification 


program may also seek approval for technician certifications 


granted previously under the program. Interested persons may 


submit to the Administrator at the address in  82.160(a)
verification 


that the program met all of the standards of  82.161(c) and 


appendix D, * * * except for some elements of the test subject 


material, in which case the person must submit verification 


that supplementary information on that material will be provided 


pursuant to appendix D, section (j)'' 


   When EPA initially drafted the language requiring programs 


to meet ``all of the standards of  82.161(c) and appendix D,'' 


these standards were considerably more general than those that 


were ultimately incorporated into the rule. The proposal had 


discussed possible requirements in broad terms. For instance, 


although the proposal anticipated that tests would be proctored, 


it did not suggest a specific ratio of proctors to examinees, 


such as the 1:50 ratio that ultimately appeared in the final 


rule. Similarly, the proposal did not specify whether tests 


would be open- or closed-book. Instead, the proposal included 


general requirements that tests be proctored, that test security 


measures be in place, and that tests be graded objectively. 


EPA believed that many voluntary programs would meet these general 


requirements. 


   In response to comments, the requirements for certifying 


organizations grew more specific. EPA believed that increasing 


the specificity of the standards strengthened the technician 


certification program overall. However, EPA did not thoroughly 


reevaluate and revise its grandfathering provision to reflect 


the new, detailed requirements. Instead, the provision
inappropriately 


continued to require voluntary programs to have met all the 


requirements of  82.161(c) and appendix D. 


   This error has now come to EPA's attention. The Agency
recognizes 


that if voluntary programs were held to each of the detailed 


standards, no voluntary technician certification program could 


be grandfathered. Appendix D contains the specific requirements 


of the technician certification program. Voluntary programs 


prior to the promulgation of the final rule could not have complied



with these requirements, as they were not yet in existence. 


Section (a) (Test Preparation) of appendix D requires that ``each 


certifying program must assemble tests by choosing a prescribed 


subset from the EPA test bank.'' However, the test bank did 


not become available until September 30, 1993. In addition, 


EPA requires programs to certify technicians with Type I, Type 


II, or Type III certifications, depending on the level of the 


test passed by the technician. EPA developed these categories 


after the close of the public comment period to the proposed 


rule. However, other logical categorization systems are possible, 


and until EPA promulgated the final rule, many technician
certification 


organizations categorized technician types differently.
Furthermore, 


section (a) requires a closed-book test, yet most testing
organizations 


prior to the final rule offered only open-book tests. Finally, 


appendix D defines the ratio of technicians to proctors, and 


requires recordkeeping and reporting requirements, all requirements



that organizations certainly could not have complied with prior 


to the promulgation of the final rule. 


   Nevertheless, many voluntary programs met most of the standards 


of appendix D, for instance proctoring tests (at least the
equivalent 


of Type II, Type III, and Universal tests), ensuring test security,



and objectively grading tests. Several programs also covered 


most of the required subject matter in the core and at least 


some technical sections, even when they did not establish the 


same categories in their testing as were established in the 


final rule (Type I, II, etc.). Where the content of their voluntary



testing fell short of that required by the final rule, programs 


expressed their willingness to provide additional testing and 


training as needed, and the final rule provided for this remedy. 


   EPA has always intended to grandfather these reasonably
stringent 


programs. By training and testing technicians in recycling
refrigerants 


before the rule was promulgated (on May 14, 1993), reasonably 


stringent voluntary programs prepared technicians to comply 


with the prohibition on venting that became effective on July 


1, 1992, and probably significantly reduced refrigerant emissions. 


These programs also served as an impetus for developing a mandatory



program, providing a model for that program. Indeed, EPA worked 


with several voluntary programs to develop the requirements 


of the mandatory program. In addition, many voluntary organizations



provided questions for the test bank, determining the scope 


of the training and the current exam. In proposing and adopting 


the grandfathering provision, EPA recognized that these benefits 


outweighed any costs that might be associated with the programs' 


unavoidable failure to have followed every requirement that 


new programs must follow under the final rule. Moreover, EPA 


did not want to discourage future participation in voluntary 


environmental training. Requiring repeat testing for technicians 


who voluntarily took adequate testing and training could discourage



people from participating in future voluntary programs. For 


these reasons, EPA is modifying the requirements for grandfathering



to ensure that these programs are not disqualified outright 


due to a drafting error by the Agency. 


   Specifically, the EPA today is proposing to amend the
grandfathering 


provision of  82.161(g). This paragraph currently states that 


``[i]nterested parties may submit to the Administrator at the 


address in  82.160(a) verification that the program met all 


of the standards of  82.161(c) and appendix D, or verification 


that the program met all of the standards of  82.161(c) and 


appendix D, except for some elements of the test subject material, 


in which case the person must submit verification that
supplementary 


information will be provided pursuant to appendix D, section 


(j).'' EPA is proposing to amend  82.161(g) to read ``Interested 


persons may submit to the Administrator at the address in  


82.160(a) verification that the program substantially complied 


with most of the standards of  82.161(c) and appendix D. If 


the program did not test or train participants on some elements 


of the test subject material, the person must submit verification 


that supplementary information on the omitted material will 


be provided pursuant to appendix D, section (j).'' 


   In reviewing requests to grandfather technicians, EPA will 


assess the extent to which a program substantially complied 


with most of the requirements in each paragraph of  82.161(c) 


and appendix D (paragraph (a) of appendix D being test preparation,



(b), proctoring, (c), test security, etc.) and most of the
paragraphs 


of  82.161(c) and appendix D, considering the information that 


was available to the program at the time of its development. 


EPA believes that this is reasonable given the limited information 


available to these programs before the final rule was published. 


For example, the proposed rule published on December 10, 1992, 


discussed the need for organizations to provide proctored tests 


under conditions that ensured test security, but did not specify 


that one proctor be provided for every 50 individuals taking 


the test. Under the approach proposed in this document, voluntary 


programs that provided proctors, but did not necessarily provide 


exactly one proctor for every 50 individuals taking the test, 


would not be disqualified on that basis alone. EPA believes 


that the modification of the final rule to replace ``met all'' 


with ``substantially complied with most'' allows EPA to review 


these programs taking such circumstances into account. 


   EPA recognizes that the current rule requires that all
technicians 


be certified by November 14, 1994. However, EPA did not anticipate 


the delay caused by this amendment, and EPA does not wish to 


force technicians who completed a voluntary program to take 


additional testing simply because they do not know whether or 


not their voluntary program will be grandfathered. Thus, the 


Agency proposes to extend the deadline until six months after 


promulgation of this amendment for those technicians who
successfully 


completed voluntary programs. During the six-month period of 


the extension, those technicians who successfully completed 


a voluntary program could continue to service, maintain, repair, 


and dispose of appliances and could buy refrigerant using the 


certificates or cards issued by the voluntary program. This 


additional time would allow EPA to consider applications for 


grandfathering and would enable grandfathered voluntary programs 


to provide supplementary information or testing, if necessary, 


and proof of certification to grandfathered technicians. To 


make their past participants eligible for this extension, programs 


would have to apply (or have already applied) within 30 days 


of publication of the final amendment: (1) To be approved as 


a ``new'' program, and (2) to grandfather technicians. This 


extension would not apply to technicians who had not participated 


in voluntary programs that apply within the set period. These 


technicians would still have to be certified by November 14, 


1994.


   In addition to the changes outlined above, EPA is clarifying 


how it would determine whether programs and individual technicians 


would be grandfathered for a given Type. Whether a voluntary 


certification program was grandfathered for a Type would depend 


upon the coverage by the program of the material in that Type. 


Whether an individual technician was grandfathered for a given 


Type would depend upon: (1) Whether the technician successfully 


completed a voluntary program that was grandfathered for that 


Type; (2) whether the technician successfully completed the 


portions of the voluntary certification program that correspond 


to that Type; and (3) whether the technician completes any
additional 


testing and training required by the Administrator pursuant 


to  82.161(g)(i). For clarity, EPA is also adding two definitions, 


defining ``to be grandfathered,'' and ``voluntary certification 


program.'' 





B. Clarification of the Scope of the Technician Certification 


Requirement





   EPA is proposing several changes to clarify the scope of 


the technician certification requirement. The current regulation 


contains three provisions addressing the scope of this requirement.



These provisions are somewhat inconsistent. The first provision 


is the definition of technician at  82.152(x): 


   Technician means any person who performs maintenance, service, 


or repair that could reasonably be expected to release class 


I or class II substances from appliances into the atmosphere, 


including but not limited to installers, contractor employees, 


in-house service personnel, and in some cases, owners. Technician 


also means any person disposing of appliances except for small 


appliances. 


   This definition implies that certification requirements are 


triggered: (1) When persons perform maintenance or repair that 


has the potential to release refrigerants from appliances into 


the atmosphere or (2) when persons dispose of appliances. 


   The second provision requiring clarification is the prohibition 


at  82.154(l): 


   (l) Effective November 14, 1994, no person may open an appliance



except for an MVAC and no person may dispose of an appliance 


except for a small appliance, MVAC, or MVAC-like appliance, 


unless such person has been certified as a technician for that 


type of appliance pursuant to  82.161. 


   The prohibition explicitly links certification requirements 


to ``opening'' of appliances. ``Opening'' an appliance is defined 


as ``any service, maintenance, or repair on an appliance that 


could be reasonably expected to release refrigerant from the 


appliance to the atmosphere unless the refrigerant were previously 


recovered from the appliance'' ( 82.152(n)). Like the definition 


of technician, the prohibition also links certification
requirements 


to the disposal of appliances, regardless of the potential for 


refrigerant release during any given phase of the disposal process.


   Although the definition of ``opening'' contains language 


very similar to the language in the definition of ``technician,'' 


specifically, ``maintenance, service, or repair that could
reasonably 


be expected to release class I or class II substances from
appliances 


into the atmosphere,'' EPA intended the definitions to include 


slightly different types of activities. While EPA intended the 


definition of ``technician'' to include any work that could 


release refrigerant into the environment, EPA intended ``opening'' 


to include entry into the refrigeration circuit itself. The 


definition of ``opening'' was developed to include exactly the 


type of work before which refrigerant should be recovered from 


the appliance (or moved to another, isolated component of the 


appliance); thus, ``opening'' an appliance triggers EPA's
evacuation 


requirements. Clearly, there are some types of activities, such 


as charging appliances, that have the potential to release
refrigerant 


but should not trigger evacuation requirements. 


   Nonetheless, when EPA developed its evacuation and certification



requirements, it believed that for all practical purposes, the 


same group of people would be included under the definition 


of ``technician'' and under the prohibition linked to the
definition 


of ``opening.'' However, EPA has since learned that some
individuals 


charge appliances or do other work that could release refrigerant 


into the environment without ever ``opening'' appliances. EPA 


believes that these individuals should be certified. On the 


other hand, some individuals open or disassemble appliances 


only after refrigerant has been removed by someone else. EPA 


believes that if these individuals service, maintain, repair, 


or dispose of only empty appliances, they should not need to 


be certified. 


   The third provision requiring clarification is the technician 


certification requirement itself: 


   Effective November 14, 1994, persons who maintain, service, 


or repair appliances, except MVACS, and persons who dispose 


of appliances, except for small appliances, room air conditioners, 


and MVACs, must be certified by an approved technician
certification 


program * * * ( 82.161(a)). 


   This provision implies that all persons who maintain, service, 


repair or dispose of appliances (except for some types of
appliances) 


must be certified, even those who do work (e.g., electrical 


work) that does not have the potential to release refrigerant 


to the atmosphere. While EPA intended this provision to include 


only the persons who fell under the first two provisions, it 


did not make this explicit in the regulation. 


   Therefore, EPA is proposing to amend the rule to clarify 


the scope of the certification requirement. First, the proposed 


rule would modify the definition of ``opening'' in order to 


distinguish it more clearly from the definition of ``technician.'' 


``Opening'' would be defined as any service, maintenance, or 


repair on an appliance that would (instead of ``could'') be 


reasonably expected to release refrigerant from the appliance 


to the atmosphere unless the refrigerant were previously recovered 


from the appliance. Second, the proposed rule would modify the 


disposal provision of the definition of ``technician'' to include 


only those parts of the disposal process (e.g., evacuation of 


the equipment) that have the potential to release refrigerant. 


Third, the proposal links this definition to the certification 


requirement at  82.161 by replacing the term ``person'' in 


that requirement with the term ``technician.'' Fourth, the
prohibition 


linking technician certification requirements to ``opening'' 


appliances would be eliminated. EPA requests comment on whether 


these changes sufficiently clarify the scope of the technician 


certification requirement. 





C. Limited Exemption From Certification Requirements for
Apprentices 





   EPA is also amending the rule to clarify that apprentices 


who meet certain requirements are exempt from the certification 


requirement until the end of their field training, as long as 


that training does not exceed two years. EPA recognizes that 


some educational programs train apprentices in the field, allowing 


them to perform maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of 


appliances under the close supervision of more experienced
technicians. 


A person would be considered an apprentice if he or she: (1) 


Was currently registered as an apprentice in service, maintenance, 


repair, or disposal of appliances with the U.S. Department of 


Labor's Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training (or its delegate), 


and (2) had less than two years of experience servicing,
maintaining, 


repairing, or disposing of appliances (whether he or she was 


in a training program at the time or not). An apprentice would 


not need to be certified as long as he or she was closely and 


continuously supervised by a certified technician while performing 


any maintenance, service, repair, or disposal that could reasonably



be expected to release refrigerant from appliances into the 


atmosphere. Uncertified apprentices would not be able to purchase 


refrigerant after November 14, 1994, however. This provision 


clearly would not permit uncertified technicians who were not 


in a training program to perform, under a certified supervisor, 


service, maintenance, repair, or disposal that could reasonably 


be expected to release refrigerant from appliances into the 


atmosphere. 


   EPA understands that both union and non-union apprentices 


in air conditioning and refrigeration throughout the U.S. are 


required to register with the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau 


of Apprenticeship and Training. EPA requests comment on whether 


there are significant exceptions to this requirement and on 


EPA's proposed use of registration with the Bureau as a
qualification 


for status as an apprentice under this rule. If registration 


with the Bureau is not an appropriate qualification, EPA requests 


comment on what other qualifications would permit EPA to
distinguish 


bona fide apprentices from other technicians. 





IV. Summary of Supporting Analysis 








A. Executive Order 12866 





   Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), 


the Agency must determine whether this regulatory action is 


``significant'' and therefore subject to OMB review and the 


requirements of the Executive Order. The Order defines
``significant'' 


regulatory action as one that is likely to lead to a rule that 


may: 


   (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million 


or more, or adversely and materially affect a sector of the 


economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public 


health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or 


communities; 


   (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere 


with an action taken or planned by another agency; 


   (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlement, 


grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations 


of recipients thereof; or 


   (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 


mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set 


forth in the Executive Order. 


   It has been determined by OMB and EPA that this amendment 


to the final rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' 


under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is therefore not 


subject to OMB review under the Executive Order. 





B. Regulatory Flexibility Act 





   The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-602, requires 


that Federal agencies examine the impacts of their regulations 


on small entities. Under 5 U.S.C. 604(a), whenever an agency 


is required to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking, 


it must prepare and make available for public comment an initial 


regulatory flexibility analysis (RFA). Such an analysis is not 


required if the head of an agency certifies that a rule will 


not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number 


of small entities, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b). 


   EPA believes that any impact that this amendment will have 


on the regulated community will serve only to provide relief 


from otherwise applicable regulations, and will therefore limit 


the negative economic impact associated with the regulations 


previously promulgated under section 608. An examination of 


the impacts on small entities was discussed in the final rule 


(58 FR 28660). That final rule assessed the impact the rule 


may have on small entities. A separate regulatory impact analysis 


accompanied the final rule and is contained in Docket A-92-01. 


I certify that this amendment to the refrigerant recycling rule 


will not have any additional negative economic impacts on any 


small entities. 





C. Paperwork Reduction Act 





   Any information collection requirements in a rule must be 


submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget 


(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. 


Because no additional informational collection requirements 


are required by this amendment, EPA has determined that the 


Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply to this rulemaking and 


no new Information Collection Request document has been prepared. 





V. Judicial Review 





   Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, EPA finds that these 


regulations are of national applicability. Accordingly, judicial 


review of this action is available only by the filing of a petition



for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District 


of Columbia Circuit within sixty days of publication of this 


action in the Federal Register. Under section 307(b)(2), the 


requirements of this rule may not be challenged later in judicial 


proceedings brought to enforce those requirements. 





List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82 





   Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, 


Chemicals, Chlorofluorocarbons, Hydrochlorofluorocarbons, Recovery 


and recycle, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Stratospheric 


ozone layer. 





   Dated: August 4, 1994. 





Carol M. Browner, 


Administrator. 


   Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, part 82, is amended 


as follows: 





PART 82-PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE 





   1. The authority citation for part 82 continues to read as 


follows: 





   Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7414, 7601, 7671-7671q. 





   2. Section 82.152 is amended by redesignating paragraphs 


(f) through (y) as paragraphs (h) through (aa), redesignating 


paragraphs (b) through (e) as paragraphs (c) through (f), revising 


newly designated paragraphs (p) and (z), and by adding new
paragraphs 


(b), (g), and (bb) to read as follows: 





 82.152   Definitions. 


*     *     *     *     *     


   (b) Apprentice means any person who is currently registered 


as an apprentice in service, maintenance, repair, or disposal 


of appliances with the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of 


Apprenticeship and Training (or its delegate). If more than 


two years have elapsed since the person first began performing 


maintenance, service, repair or disposal of appliances or
registered 


as an apprentice with the Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training, 


the person shall not be considered an apprentice. 


*     *     *     *     *     


   (g) To be grandfathered means: 


   (1) To receive the approval of the Administrator pursuant 


to  82.161(g)(1) to certify technicians who successfully completed 


a voluntary certification program; or 


   (2) To become certified as a technician pursuant to 
82.161(g)(2). 


*     *     *     *     *     


   (p) Opening an appliance means any service, maintenance, 


or repair on an appliance that would be reasonably expected 


to release class I or class II refrigerant from the appliance 


to the atmosphere unless the refrigerant were previously recovered 


from the appliance. 


*     *     *     *     *     


   (z) Technician means any person who performs maintenance, 


service, or repair that could be reasonably expected to release 


class I or class II refrigerants from appliances, except for 


MVACs, into the atmosphere, including but not limited to
installers, 


contractor employees, in-house service personnel, and in some 


cases, owners. Technician also means any person who performs 


disposal of appliances, except for small appliances, MVACs, 


and MVAC-like appliances, that could reasonably be expected 


to release class I or class II refrigerants from the appliances 


into the atmosphere. 


*     *     *     *     *     


   (bb) Voluntary certification program means a technician testing 


program operated by a person before that person obtained approval 


of a technician certification program pursuant to  82.161(c). 


   3. Section 82.154 is amended by removing paragraph (l), by 


redesignating paragraphs (m) through (o) as (l) through (n) 


respectively, and by redesignating newly designated paragraphs 


(m)(2) through (m)(6) as (m)(3) through (m)(7) respectively, 


and by adding paragraphs (m)(2) and (m)(8) to read as follows: 





 82.154   Prohibitions. 


*     *     *     *     *     


   (m) * * * 


   (2) The buyer has successfully completed a voluntary
certification 


program requesting grandfathering under  82.161(g) by [30 days 


after publication of the final rule]. This paragraph (m)(2) 


expires on [six months after publication of the final rule]. 


*     *     *     *     *     


   (8) The refrigerant is charged into an appliance by a technician



who successfully completed a voluntary certification program 


requesting grandfathering under  82.161(g) by [30 days after 


publication of the final rule]. This paragraph (m)(8)expires 


on [six months after publication of the final rule]. 


   4. Section 82.161 is amended by revising paragraph (a)
introductory 


text; by revising the word ``Persons'' to read ``Technicians'' 


in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5); by revising paragraph (g); 


and by adding paragraph (a)(6) to read as follows: 





 82.161   Technician certification. 





   (a) Effective November 14, 1994, technicians, except technicians



who successfully completed voluntary certification programs 


that apply for grandfathering under  82.161(g) by [30 days 


after publication of the final rule], must be certified by an 


approved technician certification program under the requirements 


of this paragraph. Effective [six months after publication of 


the final rule], technicians who successfully completed voluntary 


certification programs that apply for grandfathering under  


82.161(g) by [30 days after publication of the final rule] but 


who are not grandfathered for the appropriate type as set forth 


in this paragraph (a) and in  82.161(g)(2) must be certified 


by an approved technician certification program under the
requirements 


of this paragraph (a). Effective [six months after publication 


of the final rule], technicians who are grandfathered for the 


appropriate type as set forth in this paragraph and in 
82.161(g)(2) 


must have completed any additional testing and training specified 


by the Agency pursuant to  82.161(g) and appendix D of subpart 


F, section (j). 


*     *     *     *     *     


   (6) Apprentices are exempt from this requirement provided 


the apprentice is closely and continuously supervised by a
certified 


technician while performing any maintenance, service, repair, 


or disposal that could reasonably be expected to release
refrigerant 


from appliances into the environment. The supervising certified 


technician is responsible for ensuring that the apprentice complies



with this subpart. 


*     *     *     *     *     


   (g)(1) Any person seeking approval of a technician certification



program may also seek approval to certify technicians who
successfully 


completed a voluntary certification program operated previously 


by that person. Interested persons must submit to the Administrator



at the address in  82.160(a) verification that the voluntary 


certification program substantially complied with most of the 


standards of  82.161(c) and appendix D of subpart F. If the 


program did not test or train participants on some elements 


of the test subject material, the person must submit verification 


that supplementary information on the omitted material will 


be provided pursuant to appendix D of subpart F, section (j). 


Approval may be granted for Type I, Type II, or Type III
certification, 


or some combination of these, depending upon the coverage in 


the voluntary certification program of the information in each 


Type. In order to have their programs considered for
grandfathering, 


persons must submit applications both for approval as a technician 


certification program and for grandfathering by [30 days after 


publication of the final rule]. 


   (2) Technicians who successfully completed voluntary
certification 


programs may receive certification in a given Type through that 


program only if: 


   (i) The voluntary certification program successfully completed 


by the technician is grandfathered for that Type pursuant to 


 82.161(g)(1); 


   (ii) The technician successfully completed the portions of 


the voluntary certification program that correspond to that 


Type; and 


   (iii) The technician completes any additional testing and 


training required by the Administrator pursuant to  82.161(g)(i).





[FR Doc. 94-19889 Filed 8-12-94; 8:45 am]


BILLING CODE 6560-50-P





The Contents entry for this article reads as follows:





Air programs:


  Stratospheric ozone protection-


    Refrigerant recycling program, 41968

Top of page


Local Navigation




Jump to main content.