Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)
Printable Version

Table 1-5: Virginia Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 708 712 714 716 725 730
Very good 1 6 6 7 18 47
Good 278 360 360 356 586 627
Fair 294 280 280 284 109 48
Mediocre 81 63 65 65 11 8
Poor 54 3 3 4 1 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 1,528 1,534 1,560 1,556 1,547 1,557
Very good 1 4 6 6 6 64
Good 371 451 605 606 686 840
Fair 1,090 1,023 879 884 820 621
Mediocre 43 36 45 39 27 28
Poor 23 20 25 21 8 4
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Minor arterial (total reported) 3,432 3,432 3,443 3,422 3,424 3,496
Very good 1 0 0 0 0 0
Good 411 491 634 610 604 1,112
Fair 2,909 2,849 2,717 2,712 2,761 2,231
Mediocre 62 74 86 74 50 131
Poor 49 18 6 26 9 22
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 2,211
Very good N N N N N 0
Good N N N N N 265
Fair N N N N N 1,931
Mediocre N N N N N 15
Poor N N N N N 0
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.



RITA's privacy policies and procedures do not necessarily apply to external web sites. We suggest contacting these sites directly for information on their data collection and distribution policies.