|
Table 1-20
Top 10 U.S. Container Ports (thousands of TEUs) and Channel Depth (in feet)
Excel | CSV
Los Angeles, CA |
1,639 |
1,627 |
1,786 |
1,849 |
1,873 |
2,085 |
2,293 |
2,552 |
3,228 |
3,425 |
70 |
60 |
Long Beach, CA |
1,356 |
1,543 |
1,939 |
2,137 |
2,357 |
2,673 |
2,852 |
3,048 |
3,204 |
3,199 |
76 |
63 |
New York, NY |
1,294 |
1,306 |
1,404 |
1,537 |
1,533 |
1,738 |
1,884 |
2,027 |
2,200 |
2,332 |
45 |
40 |
Charleston, SC |
564 |
579 |
655 |
758 |
801 |
955 |
1,035 |
1,170 |
1,246 |
1,156 |
45 |
40 |
Oakland, CA |
746 |
772 |
879 |
919 |
803 |
843 |
902 |
915 |
989 |
960 |
50 |
42 |
Seattle, WA |
743 |
781 |
967 |
993 |
939 |
953 |
976 |
962 |
960 |
824 |
34 |
52 |
Norfolk,VA |
519 |
519 |
570 |
647 |
681 |
770 |
793 |
829 |
850 |
885 |
55 |
50 |
Houston, TX |
368 |
392 |
419 |
489 |
538 |
609 |
657 |
714 |
733 |
778 |
45 |
40 |
Savannah, GA |
387 |
406 |
418 |
445 |
456 |
529 |
558 |
624 |
720 |
813 |
48 |
42 |
Miami, FL |
418 |
469 |
497 |
497 |
505 |
624 |
602 |
618 |
684 |
717 |
42 |
42 |
Total top 10 ports |
8,035 |
8,394 |
9,534 |
10,271 |
10,486 |
11,779 |
12,552 |
13,458 |
14,814 |
15,088 |
|
|
Percent of all ports |
76% |
69% |
72% |
77% |
71% |
79% |
81% |
81% |
83% |
83% |
|
|
Total all ports |
10,583 |
12,238 |
13,173 |
13,328 |
14,794 |
14,882 |
15,556 |
16,564 |
17,938 |
18,081 |
|
|
KEY: TEU = twenty-foot equivalent unit.
SOURCE: Journal of Commerce, Port Import/Export Reporting Service, various
container data files and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Navigation Data Center,
channel depth data, personal commuication June 2001.
- Container trade has become increasingly concentrated. The top 10 container
ports handled 83 percent of U.S. container trade for the last 2 years, compared
to 76 percent in 1992.
- Three of the top five container ports in the United States are on the west
coast.
- Los Angeles and Long Beach, California, had the largest absolute growth
in container traffic between 1995 and 2000 (measured in TEUs), rising 75 percent
and 50 percent respectively.
|
|