U.S. Food and Drug Administration - CDRH Mobile
Skip NavigationFDA Logo links to FDA home pageCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationHHS Logo links to Department of Health and Human Services website
FDA Home Page | CDRH Home Page | Search | A-Z Index U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationCenter for Devices and Radiological Health Questions?
horizonal rule

Agenda and Materials From May 4, 2009 FDA Performance Report


Agenda for Quarterly Meeting on MDUFMA / MDUFA Performance

1:00 – 3:00, Monday, May 4, 2009
Room 020B, 9200 Corporate Blvd

Welcome. Kate Cook, CDRH-OCD.

FDA MDUFMA / MDUFA Performance — Actions through March 31, 2009

First Annual Report on Review Times of CLIA Waiver Applications

Update on Electronic Registration and ListingTerry McDonald, CDRH-OC.

CDRH’s Move to White Oak

Overview of FDA Medical Device Guidance Issued During FY 2009 Q1 and Q2
Donna-Bea Tillman, CDRH-ODE; Leonard Wilson, CBER; Don St. Pierre, CDRH-OIVD.

Qualitative Update on Finances and Use of Resources — Q1 and Q2, FY 2009

Discussion

[back to top]


PDF Printer VersionQuarterly Update on Medical Device Performance Goals - CBER Performance Data

Document currently only available in PDF format.

[back to top]


Quarterly Update on Medical Device Performance Goals - CDRH Performance Data

Actions through 31 March 2009
Data on FY 2003 – FY 2007 Cohorts

PMAs and Panel-Track Supplements
CDRH Actions through 31 March 2009

Workload (Applications Filed to Date)
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
PMAs 40 39 41 37 33
Panel-Track Supplements 7 8 11 16 4
Total Workload 47 47 52 53 37
FDA Decisions
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
FDA Decisions 47 47 51 50 35
Goal – Percent within 320 days 80% 90%
Percent of decisions within 320 days 91.5% 91.5% 86.3% 80.0% 91.4%
Applications without a decision 0 0 1 3 2
Cohort status Complete Complete Open Open Open
Goal – Percent within 180 days 50%
Percent of decisions within 180 days 44.7% 36.2% 33.3% 36.0% 57.1%

PMA and Panel-Track PMA Supplements
Percent of CDRH Decisions Meeting 320-Day MDUFMA Goal

Graph, percentage versus fiscal year. For FY2003, 91.5%. For FY2004, 91.5%. For FY2005, 86.3%. For FY2006, 80.0%. For FY2007, 91.4%.

Expedited PMAs
CDRH Actions through 31 March 2009

Workload (Applications Filed to Date)
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Expedited PMAs 3 14 6 2 2
FDA Decisions
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
FDA Decisions 3 13 6 2 2
Goal – Percent within 300 days 70% 80% 90%
Percent of decisions within 300 days 100.0% 92.3% 83.3% 50.0% 0
Applications without a decision 0 1 0 0 0
Cohort status Complete Open Complete Closed Closed

Expedited PMAs
Percent of CDRH Decisions Meeting MDUFMA Goal

Graph, percentage versus fiscal year. For FY2003, 100%. For FY2004, 92.3%. For FY2005, 83.3%. For FY2006, 50%. For FY2007, 0%.

180-day PMA Supplements
CDRH Actions through 31 March 2009

Workload
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
180-day PMA Supplements 201 103 99 134 140
FDA Decisions
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
FDA Decisions 201 103 99 133 139
Goal – Percent within 180 days 80% 80% 90%
Percent of decisions within 180 days 94.0% 95.1% 94.9% 96.2% 92.1%
Applications without a decision 0 0 0 1 1
Cohort status Complete Complete Complete Open Open

180-day PMA Supplements
Percent of CDRH Decisions Meeting MDUFMA Goal

Graph, percentage versus fiscal year. For FY2003, 94%. For FY2004, 95.1%. For FY2005, 94.9%. For FY2006, 96.2%. For FY2007, 92.1%.

510(k) Premarket Notifications
CDRH Actions through 31 March 2009

Workload
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Received 4,225 3,632 3,650 3,853 3,656
MDUFMA Cohort¹ 3,741 3,309 3,345 3,449 3,185

¹ The MDUFMA Cohort excludes 510(k)s that were closed for any reason other than an SE or NSE decision (e.g., when FDA finds that a 510(k) was not required). The number of 510(k)s in the MDUMFA Cohort is subject to change until the cohort is complete.

FDA Decisions (SE and NSE Determinations)
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
FDA Decisions (SE and NSE) 3,741 3,309 3,344 3,447 3,168
Goal – Percent within 90 days 75% 75% 80%
Percent of decisions within 90 days 75.7% 83.6% 91.0% 91.2% 91.2%
Remaining Applications 0 0 1 2 17
Cohort status Complete Complete Open Open Open

510(k) Premarket Notifications
Percent of CDRH Decisions Meeting MDUFMA Goal

Graph, percentage versus fiscal year. For Fy2003, 75.7%. For FY2004, 83.6%. For FY2005, 91%. For FY2006, 91.2%. For FY2007, 91.2%.

Data on FY 2008 – FY 2012 Cohorts

PMAs and Panel-track Supplements
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
Workload (Filed to Date)
33 13 - - -
Total FDA Decisions
16 0 - - -
Percent within Tier 1 goal (180 days) 100% - - - -
Tier 1 goal - Percent within 180 days 60% 60% 60% 60% 60%
Percent within Tier 2 goal (295 days) 100.0% 0.0% - - -
Tier 2 goal - Percent within 295 days 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%
Cohort status Open Open - - -

PMAs and Panel-track PMA Supplements
Percent of CDRH Decisions Meeting FY2008-FY2012 Goals

Graph, percentage versus fiscal year. For FY2008, decisions within Tier 1 were 100%, and decisions within Tier 2 were 100%. For all future years, zero percent.

PMA Modules
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
Workload (Filed to Date)
43 31 - - -
Total FDA Decisions
45 16 - - -
Percent within Tier 1 goal (90 days) 51.1% 75.0% - - -
Tier 1 goal - Percent within 90 days 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
Percent within Tier 2 goal (120 days) 91.1% 100.0% - - -
Tier 2 goal - Percent within 120 days 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%
Cohort status Open Open - - -

PMA Modules
Percent of CDRH Decisions Meeting FY2008-FY2012

Graph, percentage versus fiscal year. For FY2008, decisions within tier 1, 51.1%. Decisions within tier 2, 91.1%. For FY2009, decisions within tier 1, 75%. Decisions within tier 2, 100%. All future years, zero percent.

180-day PMA Supplements
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
Workload (Filed to Date)
170 90 - - -
Total FDA Decisions
142 14 - - -
Percent within Tier 1 goal (180 days) 96.5% 100.0% - - -
Tier 1 goal - Percent within 180 days 85% 85% 85% 85% 85%
Percent within Tier 2 goal (210 days) 98.6% 100.0% - - -
Tier 2 goal - Percent within 210 days 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Cohort status Open Open - - -

180-day PMA Supplements
Percent of CDRH Decisions Meeting FY2008-FY2012 Goals

Graph. Percentage versus fiscal year. For FY2008, decisions within tier 1, 96.5%. Decisions within tier 2, 98.6%. For FY2009, decisions within tier 1 and 2 both 100%. All future years, zero percent.

Real-time PMA Supplements
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
Workload (Filed to Date)
248 167 - - -
Total FDA Decisions
238 108 - - -
Percent within Tier 1 goal (60 days) 96.6% 100.0% - - -
Tier 1 goal - Percent within 60 days 80% 80% 80% 80% 80%
Percent within Tier 2 goal (90 days) 98.3% 100.0% - - -
Tier 2 goal - Percent within 90 days 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%
Cohort status Open Open - - -

Real-time PMA Supplements
Percent of CDRH Decisions Meeting FY2008-FY2012 Goals

Graph, percentage versus fiscal year. For FY2008, decisions within tier 1, 96.6%. Decisions within tier 2, 98.3%. For FY2009, decisions within tier 1 and 2 both 100%. For future years, zero percent.

510(k)s
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
Workload (Filed to Date)
3,848 1,925 - - -
MDUFMA Cohort
3,395 1,873 - - -
Total FDA Decisions 3,082 690      
Percent within Tier 1 goal (90 days) 95.5% 98.3% - - -
Tier 1 goal - Percent within 90 days 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%
Percent within Tier 2 goal (150 days) 99.4% 100.0% - - -
Tier 2 goal - Percent within 150 days 98% 98% 98% 98% 98%
Cohort status Open Open - - -

510(k) Premarket Notifications
Percent of CDRH Decisions Meeting FY2008-FY2012 Goals

Graph, percentage versus fiscal year. For FY2008, decisions within tier 1, 95.5%. Decisions within tier 2, 99.4%. For FY2009, decisions within tier 1, 98.3%. Decisions within tier 2, 100%. For all future years, zero percent.

[back to top]


CDRH 510(k) Premarket Notifications, FY 2003 - FY 2008

CDRH 510(k) Premarket Notifications, FY 2003- FY 2008 (Receipt Cohorts)
  FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
Receipts 4,225 3,632 3,650 3,853 3,656 3,848
SE and NSE Decisions 3,741 3,310 3,344 3,447 3,147 3,106
NSE 122 121 133 144 129 117
% of all decisions 3.3% 3.7% 4.0% 4.2% 4.1% 3.8%
% of all outcomes 2.9% 3.3% 3.6% 3.7% 3.5% 3.3%
SE 3,619 3,189 3,211 3,303 3,045 2,989
% of all decisions 96.7% 96.3% 96.0% 95.8% 95.9% 96.2%
% of all outcomes 85.7% 87.8% 88.0% 85.8% 83.7% 83.7%
Other Outcomes 484 322 305 404 466 463
% of all outcomes 11.5% 8.9% 8.4% 10.5% 12.8% 13.0%
All Outcomes 4,225 3,632 3,649 3,851 3,640 3,569
Still pending 0 0 1 2 16 279
% of receipts 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.4% 7.3%

Data as of 15-April-2009
All decisions = SE decisions + NSE decisions
Other outcomes = Final actions other than SE and NSE, e.g., withdrawal, deletion, not a device.
All outcomes = SE decisions + NSE decisions + Other outcomes
510(k)s with AN ("approved de novo") decision code are included in NSE counts.
510(k)s with CP ("called for PMA") decision code are included in SE counts.

[back to top]


CDRH Real-Time PMA Supplements, FY 2003 - FY 2008

CDRH Real Time PMA Supplements, FY 2003 - 2008 (Receipt Cohorts)
  FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
Receipts 193 195 196 291 265 249
FDA Decisions 190 183 190 274 259 240
"Not Approvalable" 6 9 9 15 12 23
% of all decisions 3.2% 4.9% 4.7% 5.5% 4.6% 9.6%
% of all outcomes 3.1% 4.6% 4.6% 5.2% 4.5% 9.3%
Other Outcomes 3 12 6 16 5 8
% of all outcomes 1.6% 6.2% 3.1% 5.5% 1.9% 3.2%
All Outcomes 193 195 196 290 264 248
Still Pending 0 0 0 1 1 1
% of all outcomes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% 13.0%

Data as of 21-April-2009
"Not Approvable"
Other Outcomes = Final actions other than FDA Decisions, e.g., Withdrawal, Other.
All Outcomes = FDA Decisions + Other Outcomes.

[back to top]


Comparison of Review Time Performance of CDRH 180-day PMA Supplements

Using MDUFA Two-Tier Performance Measuers

Caveat: Data for FY 2003 - FY 2007 is not strictly comparable to data for FY 2008 and later years. Beginning with FY 2008, the process for review of 180-day PMA supplements allows FDA to issue "major deficiency" letters, allowing the applicant an opportunity to correct deficiencies without terminating FDA's review. Prior to FY 2008, FDA issued a "not approvable" letter in similar situations. A "not approvable" decision counts as an "FDA decision", while a "major deficiency" letter does not.

 
FY 2003 -
FY 2007
FY 2008
Number of Submissions Received 673 170
Decisions Made through March 31, 2009:    
Percent of Decisions within Tier 1 (180 days) 97.5% 96.4%
Percent of Decisions within Tier 2 (210 days) 98.6% 98.6%
Best-case Projection (to completion of cohort):    
Percent of Decisions within Tier 1 (180 days) 97.2% 95.7%
Percent of Decisions within Tier 2 (210 days) 98.3% 98.8%
Worst-case Projection (to completion of cohort):    
Percent of Decisions within Tier 1 (180 days) 97.2% 82.3%
Percent of Decisions within Tier 2 (210 days) 98.3% 84.1%

[back to top]


CLIA Waiver Decisions Made During FY 2008

CLIA Waiver Decisions Made During FY 2008
FDA Decisions Review Times
FDA Days MFG Days Total
APPR - Approved 61 0 61
APPR - Approved 248 38 286
APPR - Approved 248 38 286
APPR - Approved 398 0 398
APPR - Approved 398 0 398
Average Time for Approvals 271 15 286
DENY - Denied 56 0 56
DENY - Denied 102 0 102
DENY - Denied 129 0 129
DENY - Denied 189 0 189
DENY - Denied 199 0 199
DENY - Denied 287 0 287
Average Time for Denials 160 0 160
Average Time for All Decisions 210 7 217

[back to top]


FY 2009 Establishment Registration ­ Fee Payments and Completed Registrations

Fee Payments and Completed Registrations as of March 31, 2009

Approximate number of establishments that have paid the registration fee for FY 2009; some of these have not yet registered. 13,915 
Registrations completed as of March 31, 2009; all of these establishments are subject to, and have paid, the establishment registration fee. 13,035 
Section 738(c)(2) fee-adjustment trigger. <12,250 

[back to top]


Medical Device Registration and Listing Data for FY 2009

Medical Device Registration and Listing Data for FY 2009
Status as of April 3, 2009
An establishment that could be included in more than one Establishment Type category is assigned to a single category according the to ranking shown in the left-most column. For example, if an establishment is both a manufacturer and a contract manufacturer, it is counted only as a manufacturer. Similarly, if an establishment has listed devices in more than one class, it is counted only in the highest class. For example, if an establishment has listed both a class I device and a class II device, it is counted only under class II.
    Number of Establishments Registered, by Highest Class of Device Listed  
    Domestic Establishments Foreign Establishments  
Rank Establishment Type Class I Class II Class III Total Class I Class II Class III Total Total
Registered
Establishments
Establishments Subject to MDUFA Registration Fee
1 Manufacturer 1,588 2,690 380 4,658 3,068 2,626 210 5,904 10,562
2 Contract Manufacturer 118 155 24 297 271 275 25 571 868
3 Contract Sterilizer 9 6 0 15 14 7 0 21 36
4 Specification Developer 519 665 62 1,246 101 139 6 246 1,492
5 Reprocessor of Single-Use Devices 2 12 0 14 1 0 0 1 15
6 U.S. Manufacturer of Export-Only Devices 7 25 30 62 0 0 0 0 62
Total, Subject to MDUFMA Fee 2,243 3,553 496 6,292 3,455 3,047 241 6,743 13,035
Establishments Not Subject to MDUFA Registration Fee
7 Repackager / Relabeler 560 377 27 964 168 62 3 233 1,197
8 Remanufacturer 17 26 0 43 24 8 0 32 75
9 Foreign Exporter       0 503 156 11 670 670
10 Initial Distributor / Importer       3,622       0 3,622
11 Unknown       86       62 148
Total, Not Subject to MDUFMA Fee 577 403 27 4,715 695 226 14 997 5,712
All Registered Establishments
Total, All Registered Establishments 2,820 3,956 523 11,007 4,150 3,273 255 7,740 18,747

[back to top]


CDRH Relocation to White Oak

CDRH Components Relocating

[back to top]


Medical Device Guidance Documents Issued During FY 2009

Through March 31, 2009

* indicates a guidance required by FDAAA or the FDA commitment letter, or issued to implement a FDAAA provision.

Second Quarter (January 2009 – March 2009) — Five publications

First Quarter (October 2008 – December 2008) — Five Publications

[back to top]


FY 2009 Medical Device User Fee Collections

FY 2009 Medical Device User Fee Collections
As of March 31, 2009
Source FY 2009
Authorized 1
Expected
to Date 2
FY 2009 Fee Revenues FY 2009 Surplus (Deficit)
Receipts Refunds Net % of Authorized % of Expected cf. Authorized cf. Expected
Establishment Registration Fees $23,600,250 $23,600,250 $26,009,389 $251,157 $25,758,232 109.1% 109.1% $2,157,982 $2,157,982
Application / Reporting Fees $28,946,750 $14,473,375 $17,186,073 $92,123 $17,092,950 59.0% 118.1% $11,853,800 (Deficit) $2,619,575
Uncategorized3     $314,786 $- $314,786     $314,786 $314,786
Total $52,547,000 $38,073,625 $43,510,248 $344,280 $43,165,968 82.1% 113.4% $9,381,032 (Deficit) $5,092,343

Notes:
1. The Authorized revenues shown for Establishment Registration fees assume 12,750 establishments will register and pay the fee of $1,851. The Authorized revenues shown for Application / Reporting Fees represents the difference between the Total authorized fee revenues and the amount shown for authorized Establishment Registration revenues. Total FY 2009 authorized fee revenues are specified in section 738(h)(3) of the FD&C Act.

2. Expected to date reflects the percentage of revenue we should have collected to the date of this report. Because all establishment registrations should be completed in the first quarter of each year, see sections 510(b)(2) and 510(i)(1)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act, we expect 100% of establishment registration fees to be paid in the first quarter. We expect application / reporting fees to be paid in a steady stream, with 25% of expected revenue being paid each quarter. The following table illustrates these expectations.

Cumulative Percent of Authorized Amounts Expected During the Fiscal Year
Source of Revenue Close of Quarter Ending
December 31 March 31 June 30 September 30
Establishment Registration Fees 100% 100% 100% 100%
APPR - Approved 25% 50% 75% 100%

3. Nearly all of these amounts are believed to be attributed to establishment registration fees.

Comparison:
Medical Device User Fee Collection in Prior Years
Excludes Unearned Fees, Includes Refunds
Fy 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 30 FY 2007 FY 2008
$21,620,549 $25,309,853 $31,801,091 $34,567,188 $26,893,394 $48,731,246

[back to top]


FY 2009 Medical Devices Appropriation

The Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (H.R. 1105) was signed on March 11, 2009, providing FDA its annual appropriation for FY 2009. FDA received an appropriation of $280,587,000 for the medical device program, an increase of 8.7% over last year’s appropriation. Medical device user fee revenues are increased 8.5%; see section 738(h)(3).

During FY 2009, FDA is focusing on initiatives that include:

During FY 2009, our recruitment efforts are targeting the following types of expertise:

These recruitments will allow FDA to:

[back to top]


Information Management Initiatives, 2009

May 2009 Update

[back to top]


FY 2009 Staff College Internal Training Report

From 10/01/2008 to 03/31/2009

As of: 04/09/2009

Table X: MDUFMA Related Internal Training
Topical Area # of Courses Total# of Participants Examples of Training Conducted/Attended Between October 1, 2008- March 31, 2009
Regulatory and Law (LAW) 11 427
  • Reviewer Training: 510(k) Essentials
  • Product Codes: Make the Connection
  • Medical Device Law
  • Basic Food and Drug Law
  • Guidance Prioritization and Development
  • Interactive Review of PMAs and 510(k)s
  • Advanced Topics in Regulatory Issues: STED
Science (SCI) 81 825
  • The New Practice of Public Health
  • Hierarchical Bayesian Methods & Software for
  • Data Analysis
  • EMC Requirements for Medical Products
  • Introduction to Medical Device Software Risk
  • Management
  • Pesticides and Nanotechnology
  • Epidemiology Grand Rounds
  • Network Presentations – Huber Needles
  • CDRH Science Grand Rounds: Adhesion Barriers
  • Neurology Meet the Experts (2 sessions)
  • High Performance Computing Technologies & Applications in Medicine
Leadership Education & Development (LED) 8 178
  • Situational Leadership
  • FDA Human Resources Management for  Supervisors
  • Team of Rivals
  • Effective Presentation Skills
Professional Development 37 674
  • Building a Winning Scientific & Technical Team
  • Speaking Under Fire
  • Change Management
  • Executive Grammar
  • Decision Analysis for Decision Makers
  • Basics of Good Report Writing
  • Handling People with Diplomacy and Tact
TOTAL 87 2104  

FY09 completion summary data for CDRH staff college internal learning events, october 1 2008 through march 31 2009. Unique students (number of distinct students), 766. Course completions (successful attendance in a learning event), 2113. Courses, 89. SCOL contact hours, 10846. Data date april 9, 2009.

CDRH FY09 internal training summary october 1 2008 through march 31 2009, science and law learning events. For law, 434 student completions, 294 unique students, 12 learning events, and 2399 contact hours. For sci, 825 student completions, 450 unique students, 31 learning events, 1998.5 contact hours.

CDRH FY09 internal training summary october 1 2008 through march 31 2009, leadership and professional development learning events. For leadership, 178 student competions, 117 unique students, 8 learning events, 1149 contact hours. For professional development, 676 student completions, 409 unique students, 38 learning events, 5299 contact hours.

CDRH total distribution FY09, october 1 2008 through march 31 2009. Student course completion by category (successful attendance in a learning event). Law, 434, 20.5%. Leadership, 178, 8.4%. Professional development, 676, 32%. Science, 825, 39%. Total, 2113, 100%.

*Course Completions = Successful attendance in a Learning Event

CDRH total distribution FY09 October 1 2008 through march 31 2009. Contact hours by category. Law, 2399 hours, 22.1%. Leadership, 1149 hours, 10.6%. Professional development, 5299 hours, 48.9%. Science, 1999 hours, 18.4%. Total hours 10846.

Key: LAW = Law & Policy, LED = Leadership,
PRO = Professional Development, SCI = Science

CDRH total distribution FY09 October 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009. Staff College learning events by category. Law, 12, 13.5%. Leadership, 8, 9%. Professional development, 38, 42.7%. Science, 31, 34.8%. Total, 89, 100%.

CDRH total distribution FY09 October 1 2008 through March 31 2009. Unique student count by category (number of distinct students). Law, 294 students. Leadership, 117 students. professional development, 409 students. Science, 450 students.

* Unique Students = Number of distinct students

Updated May 4, 2009

horizonal rule

CDRH Home Page | CDRH A-Z Index | Contact CDRH | Accessibility | Disclaimer
FDA Home Page | Search FDA Site | FDA A-Z Index | Contact FDA | HHS Home Page

Center for Devices and Radiological Health / CDRH