1:00 – 3:00, Monday, May 4, 2009
Room 020B, 9200 Corporate Blvd
Welcome. Kate Cook, CDRH-OCD.
FDA MDUFMA / MDUFA Performance — Actions through March 31, 2009
First Annual Report on Review Times of CLIA Waiver Applications
Update on Electronic Registration and Listing — Terry McDonald, CDRH-OC.
CDRH’s Move to White Oak
Overview of FDA Medical Device Guidance Issued During FY 2009 Q1 and Q2 —
Donna-Bea Tillman, CDRH-ODE; Leonard Wilson, CBER; Don St. Pierre, CDRH-OIVD.
Qualitative Update on Finances and Use of Resources — Q1 and Q2, FY 2009
Discussion
Document currently only available in PDF format.
Actions through 31 March 2009
Data on FY 2003 – FY 2007 Cohorts
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAs | 40 | 39 | 41 | 37 | 33 |
Panel-Track Supplements | 7 | 8 | 11 | 16 | 4 |
Total Workload | 47 | 47 | 52 | 53 | 37 |
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDA Decisions | 47 | 47 | 51 | 50 | 35 |
Goal – Percent within 320 days | — | — | — | 80% | 90% |
Percent of decisions within 320 days | 91.5% | 91.5% | 86.3% | 80.0% | 91.4% |
Applications without a decision | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
Cohort status | Complete | Complete | Open | Open | Open |
Goal – Percent within 180 days | — | — | — | — | 50% |
Percent of decisions within 180 days | 44.7% | 36.2% | 33.3% | 36.0% | 57.1% |
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expedited PMAs | 3 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDA Decisions | 3 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
Goal – Percent within 300 days | — | — | 70% | 80% | 90% |
Percent of decisions within 300 days | 100.0% | 92.3% | 83.3% | 50.0% | 0 |
Applications without a decision | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Cohort status | Complete | Open | Complete | Closed | Closed |
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
180-day PMA Supplements | 201 | 103 | 99 | 134 | 140 |
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDA Decisions | 201 | 103 | 99 | 133 | 139 |
Goal – Percent within 180 days | — | — | 80% | 80% | 90% |
Percent of decisions within 180 days | 94.0% | 95.1% | 94.9% | 96.2% | 92.1% |
Applications without a decision | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Cohort status | Complete | Complete | Complete | Open | Open |
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Received | 4,225 | 3,632 | 3,650 | 3,853 | 3,656 |
MDUFMA Cohort¹ | 3,741 | 3,309 | 3,345 | 3,449 | 3,185 |
¹ The MDUFMA Cohort excludes 510(k)s that were closed for any reason other than an SE or NSE decision (e.g., when FDA finds that a 510(k) was not required). The number of 510(k)s in the MDUMFA Cohort is subject to change until the cohort is complete.
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDA Decisions (SE and NSE) | 3,741 | 3,309 | 3,344 | 3,447 | 3,168 |
Goal – Percent within 90 days | — | — | 75% | 75% | 80% |
Percent of decisions within 90 days | 75.7% | 83.6% | 91.0% | 91.2% | 91.2% |
Remaining Applications | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 17 |
Cohort status | Complete | Complete | Open | Open | Open |
FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Workload (Filed to Date) |
33 | 13 | - | - | - |
Total FDA Decisions |
16 | 0 | - | - | - |
Percent within Tier 1 goal (180 days) | 100% | - | - | - | - |
Tier 1 goal - Percent within 180 days | 60% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 60% |
Percent within Tier 2 goal (295 days) | 100.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - |
Tier 2 goal - Percent within 295 days | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% |
Cohort status | Open | Open | - | - | - |
FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Workload (Filed to Date) |
43 | 31 | - | - | - |
Total FDA Decisions |
45 | 16 | - | - | - |
Percent within Tier 1 goal (90 days) | 51.1% | 75.0% | - | - | - |
Tier 1 goal - Percent within 90 days | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
Percent within Tier 2 goal (120 days) | 91.1% | 100.0% | - | - | - |
Tier 2 goal - Percent within 120 days | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% |
Cohort status | Open | Open | - | - | - |
FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Workload (Filed to Date) |
170 | 90 | - | - | - |
Total FDA Decisions |
142 | 14 | - | - | - |
Percent within Tier 1 goal (180 days) | 96.5% | 100.0% | - | - | - |
Tier 1 goal - Percent within 180 days | 85% | 85% | 85% | 85% | 85% |
Percent within Tier 2 goal (210 days) | 98.6% | 100.0% | - | - | - |
Tier 2 goal - Percent within 210 days | 95% | 95% | 95% | 95% | 95% |
Cohort status | Open | Open | - | - | - |
FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Workload (Filed to Date) |
248 | 167 | - | - | - |
Total FDA Decisions |
238 | 108 | - | - | - |
Percent within Tier 1 goal (60 days) | 96.6% | 100.0% | - | - | - |
Tier 1 goal - Percent within 60 days | 80% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 80% |
Percent within Tier 2 goal (90 days) | 98.3% | 100.0% | - | - | - |
Tier 2 goal - Percent within 90 days | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% |
Cohort status | Open | Open | - | - | - |
FY 2008 | FY 2009 | FY 2010 | FY 2011 | FY 2012 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Workload (Filed to Date) |
3,848 | 1,925 | - | - | - |
MDUFMA Cohort |
3,395 | 1,873 | - | - | - |
Total FDA Decisions | 3,082 | 690 | |||
Percent within Tier 1 goal (90 days) | 95.5% | 98.3% | - | - | - |
Tier 1 goal - Percent within 90 days | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% |
Percent within Tier 2 goal (150 days) | 99.4% | 100.0% | - | - | - |
Tier 2 goal - Percent within 150 days | 98% | 98% | 98% | 98% | 98% |
Cohort status | Open | Open | - | - | - |
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 | FY 2008 | |
Receipts | 4,225 | 3,632 | 3,650 | 3,853 | 3,656 | 3,848 |
SE and NSE Decisions | 3,741 | 3,310 | 3,344 | 3,447 | 3,147 | 3,106 |
NSE | 122 | 121 | 133 | 144 | 129 | 117 |
% of all decisions | 3.3% | 3.7% | 4.0% | 4.2% | 4.1% | 3.8% |
% of all outcomes | 2.9% | 3.3% | 3.6% | 3.7% | 3.5% | 3.3% |
SE | 3,619 | 3,189 | 3,211 | 3,303 | 3,045 | 2,989 |
% of all decisions | 96.7% | 96.3% | 96.0% | 95.8% | 95.9% | 96.2% |
% of all outcomes | 85.7% | 87.8% | 88.0% | 85.8% | 83.7% | 83.7% |
Other Outcomes | 484 | 322 | 305 | 404 | 466 | 463 |
% of all outcomes | 11.5% | 8.9% | 8.4% | 10.5% | 12.8% | 13.0% |
All Outcomes | 4,225 | 3,632 | 3,649 | 3,851 | 3,640 | 3,569 |
Still pending | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 279 |
% of receipts | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 7.3% |
Data as of 15-April-2009
All decisions = SE decisions + NSE decisions
Other outcomes = Final actions other than SE and NSE, e.g., withdrawal, deletion, not a device.
All outcomes = SE decisions + NSE decisions + Other outcomes
510(k)s with AN ("approved de novo") decision code are included in NSE counts.
510(k)s with CP ("called for PMA") decision code are included in SE counts.
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 | FY 2008 | |
Receipts | 193 | 195 | 196 | 291 | 265 | 249 |
FDA Decisions | 190 | 183 | 190 | 274 | 259 | 240 |
"Not Approvalable" | 6 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 12 | 23 |
% of all decisions | 3.2% | 4.9% | 4.7% | 5.5% | 4.6% | 9.6% |
% of all outcomes | 3.1% | 4.6% | 4.6% | 5.2% | 4.5% | 9.3% |
Other Outcomes | 3 | 12 | 6 | 16 | 5 | 8 |
% of all outcomes | 1.6% | 6.2% | 3.1% | 5.5% | 1.9% | 3.2% |
All Outcomes | 193 | 195 | 196 | 290 | 264 | 248 |
Still Pending | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
% of all outcomes | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 13.0% |
Data as of 21-April-2009
"Not Approvable"
Other Outcomes = Final actions other than FDA Decisions, e.g.,
Withdrawal, Other.
All Outcomes = FDA Decisions + Other Outcomes.
Using MDUFA Two-Tier Performance Measuers
Caveat: Data for FY 2003 - FY 2007 is not strictly comparable to data for FY 2008 and later years. Beginning with FY 2008, the process for review of 180-day PMA supplements allows FDA to issue "major deficiency" letters, allowing the applicant an opportunity to correct deficiencies without terminating FDA's review. Prior to FY 2008, FDA issued a "not approvable" letter in similar situations. A "not approvable" decision counts as an "FDA decision", while a "major deficiency" letter does not.
FY 2003 - FY 2007 |
FY 2008 | |
---|---|---|
Number of Submissions Received | 673 | 170 |
Decisions Made through March 31, 2009: | ||
Percent of Decisions within Tier 1 (180 days) | 97.5% | 96.4% |
Percent of Decisions within Tier 2 (210 days) | 98.6% | 98.6% |
Best-case Projection (to completion of cohort): | ||
Percent of Decisions within Tier 1 (180 days) | 97.2% | 95.7% |
Percent of Decisions within Tier 2 (210 days) | 98.3% | 98.8% |
Worst-case Projection (to completion of cohort): | ||
Percent of Decisions within Tier 1 (180 days) | 97.2% | 82.3% |
Percent of Decisions within Tier 2 (210 days) | 98.3% | 84.1% |
FDA Decisions | Review Times | ||
---|---|---|---|
FDA Days | MFG Days | Total | |
APPR - Approved | 61 | 0 | 61 |
APPR - Approved | 248 | 38 | 286 |
APPR - Approved | 248 | 38 | 286 |
APPR - Approved | 398 | 0 | 398 |
APPR - Approved | 398 | 0 | 398 |
Average Time for Approvals | 271 | 15 | 286 |
DENY - Denied | 56 | 0 | 56 |
DENY - Denied | 102 | 0 | 102 |
DENY - Denied | 129 | 0 | 129 |
DENY - Denied | 189 | 0 | 189 |
DENY - Denied | 199 | 0 | 199 |
DENY - Denied | 287 | 0 | 287 |
Average Time for Denials | 160 | 0 | 160 |
Average Time for All Decisions | 210 | 7 | 217 |
Fee Payments and Completed Registrations as of March 31, 2009
Approximate number of establishments that have paid the registration fee for FY 2009; some of these have not yet registered. | 13,915 |
Registrations completed as of March 31, 2009; all of these establishments are subject to, and have paid, the establishment registration fee. | 13,035 |
Section 738(c)(2) fee-adjustment trigger. | <12,250 |
Medical Device Registration and Listing Data for FY 2009 Status as of April 3, 2009 |
||||||||||
An establishment that could be included in more than one Establishment Type category is assigned to a single category according the to ranking shown in the left-most column. For example, if an establishment is both a manufacturer and a contract manufacturer, it is counted only as a manufacturer. Similarly, if an establishment has listed devices in more than one class, it is counted only in the highest class. For example, if an establishment has listed both a class I device and a class II device, it is counted only under class II. | ||||||||||
Number of Establishments Registered, by Highest Class of Device Listed | ||||||||||
Domestic Establishments | Foreign Establishments | |||||||||
Rank | Establishment Type | Class I | Class II | Class III | Total | Class I | Class II | Class III | Total | Total Registered Establishments |
Establishments Subject to MDUFA Registration Fee | ||||||||||
1 | Manufacturer | 1,588 | 2,690 | 380 | 4,658 | 3,068 | 2,626 | 210 | 5,904 | 10,562 |
2 | Contract Manufacturer | 118 | 155 | 24 | 297 | 271 | 275 | 25 | 571 | 868 |
3 | Contract Sterilizer | 9 | 6 | 0 | 15 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 21 | 36 |
4 | Specification Developer | 519 | 665 | 62 | 1,246 | 101 | 139 | 6 | 246 | 1,492 |
5 | Reprocessor of Single-Use Devices | 2 | 12 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 |
6 | U.S. Manufacturer of Export-Only Devices | 7 | 25 | 30 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62 |
Total, Subject to MDUFMA Fee | 2,243 | 3,553 | 496 | 6,292 | 3,455 | 3,047 | 241 | 6,743 | 13,035 | |
Establishments Not Subject to MDUFA Registration Fee | ||||||||||
7 | Repackager / Relabeler | 560 | 377 | 27 | 964 | 168 | 62 | 3 | 233 | 1,197 |
8 | Remanufacturer | 17 | 26 | 0 | 43 | 24 | 8 | 0 | 32 | 75 |
9 | Foreign Exporter | 0 | 503 | 156 | 11 | 670 | 670 | |||
10 | Initial Distributor / Importer | 3,622 | 0 | 3,622 | ||||||
11 | Unknown | 86 | 62 | 148 | ||||||
Total, Not Subject to MDUFMA Fee | 577 | 403 | 27 | 4,715 | 695 | 226 | 14 | 997 | 5,712 | |
All Registered Establishments | ||||||||||
Total, All Registered Establishments | 2,820 | 3,956 | 523 | 11,007 | 4,150 | 3,273 | 255 | 7,740 | 18,747 |
Through March 31, 2009
* indicates a guidance required by FDAAA or the FDA commitment letter, or issued to implement a FDAAA provision.
Source | FY 2009 Authorized 1 |
Expected to Date 2 |
FY 2009 Fee Revenues | FY 2009 Surplus (Deficit) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Receipts | Refunds | Net | % of Authorized | % of Expected | cf. Authorized | cf. Expected | |||
Establishment Registration Fees | $23,600,250 | $23,600,250 | $26,009,389 | $251,157 | $25,758,232 | 109.1% | 109.1% | $2,157,982 | $2,157,982 |
Application / Reporting Fees | $28,946,750 | $14,473,375 | $17,186,073 | $92,123 | $17,092,950 | 59.0% | 118.1% | $11,853,800 (Deficit) | $2,619,575 |
Uncategorized3 | $314,786 | $- | $314,786 | $314,786 | $314,786 | ||||
Total | $52,547,000 | $38,073,625 | $43,510,248 | $344,280 | $43,165,968 | 82.1% | 113.4% | $9,381,032 (Deficit) | $5,092,343 |
Notes:
1. The Authorized revenues shown for Establishment Registration fees assume 12,750 establishments will register and pay the fee of $1,851.
The Authorized revenues shown for Application / Reporting Fees represents the difference between the Total authorized fee revenues and the
amount shown for authorized Establishment Registration revenues. Total FY 2009 authorized fee revenues are specified in section
738(h)(3) of the FD&C Act.
2. Expected to date reflects the percentage of revenue we should have collected to the date of this report. Because all establishment registrations should be completed in the first quarter of each year, see sections 510(b)(2) and 510(i)(1)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act, we expect 100% of establishment registration fees to be paid in the first quarter. We expect application / reporting fees to be paid in a steady stream, with 25% of expected revenue being paid each quarter. The following table illustrates these expectations.
Source of Revenue | Close of Quarter Ending | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
December 31 | March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | |
Establishment Registration Fees | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
APPR - Approved | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
3. Nearly all of these amounts are believed to be attributed to establishment registration fees.
Comparison: Medical Device User Fee Collection in Prior Years Excludes Unearned Fees, Includes Refunds |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fy 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 30 | FY 2007 | FY 2008 |
$21,620,549 | $25,309,853 | $31,801,091 | $34,567,188 | $26,893,394 | $48,731,246 |
The Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (H.R. 1105) was signed on March 11, 2009, providing FDA its annual appropriation for FY 2009. FDA received an appropriation of $280,587,000 for the medical device program, an increase of 8.7% over last year’s appropriation. Medical device user fee revenues are increased 8.5%; see section 738(h)(3).
During FY 2009, FDA is focusing on initiatives that include:
During FY 2009, our recruitment efforts are targeting the following types of expertise:
These recruitments will allow FDA to:
May 2009 Update
From 10/01/2008 to 03/31/2009
As of: 04/09/2009
Topical Area | # of Courses | Total# of Participants | Examples of Training Conducted/Attended Between October 1, 2008- March 31, 2009 |
---|---|---|---|
Regulatory and Law (LAW) | 11 | 427 |
|
Science (SCI) | 81 | 825 |
|
Leadership Education & Development (LED) | 8 | 178 |
|
Professional Development | 37 | 674 |
|
TOTAL | 87 | 2104 |
*Course Completions = Successful attendance in a Learning Event
Key: LAW = Law & Policy, LED = Leadership,
PRO = Professional Development, SCI = Science
* Unique Students = Number of distinct students
Updated May 4, 2009
CDRH Home Page | CDRH A-Z Index | Contact CDRH | Accessibility | Disclaimer
FDA Home Page | Search FDA Site | FDA A-Z Index | Contact FDA | HHS Home Page
Center for Devices and Radiological Health / CDRH