![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510171440im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510171440im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510171440im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510171440im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
Table 2
Top 10 U.S. Maritime Ports for International Trade by Value and Weight: 1999
Excel | CSV
1 |
Long Beach, CA |
89.0 |
14.1 |
1 |
Houston, TX |
95.1 |
8.7 |
2 |
Los Angeles, CA |
83.1 |
13.1 |
2 |
SouthLouisiana, LA |
70.9 |
6.5 |
3 |
NewYork, NY |
71.7 |
11.3 |
3 |
NewOrleans, LA |
69.8 |
6.4 |
4 |
Houston, TX |
34.1 |
5.4 |
4 |
NewYork, NY |
57.6 |
5.3 |
5 |
Seattle, WA |
32.2 |
5.1 |
5 |
Corpus Christie, TX |
56.9 |
5.2 |
6 |
Charleston, SC |
29.1 |
4.6 |
6 |
Beaumont, TX |
48.1 |
4.4 |
7 |
Oakland, CA |
25.8 |
4.1 |
7 |
Morgan City, LA |
42.8 |
3.9 |
8 |
Norfolk, VA |
24.8 |
3.9 |
8 |
Long Beach, CA |
35.7 |
3.3 |
9 |
Baltimore, MD |
19.3 |
3.1 |
9 |
Los Angeles, CA |
32.8 |
3.0 |
10 |
Tacoma, WA |
17.0 |
2.7 |
10 |
Lake Charles, LA |
28.7 |
2.6 |
|
Top 10 total |
|
67.4 |
|
Top 10 total |
|
49.1 |
SOURCE:
U.S. Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration, Office of Statistical and Economic Analysis, Annual Waterborne databanks, 1999.
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510171440im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510171440im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510171440im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510171440im_/http://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |