Stage 0 Cervical Cancer
Current Clinical Trials
Properly treated, tumor control of in situ cervical carcinoma should be nearly
100%. Either expert colposcopic-directed biopsy or cone biopsy is required to
exclude invasive disease before therapy is undertaken. A correlation between
cytology and colposcopic-directed biopsy is also necessary before local
ablative therapy is done. Even so, unrecognized invasive disease treated with
inadequate ablative therapy may be the most common cause of failure.[1]
Failure to identify the disease, lack of correlation between the Pap smear and
colposcopic findings, adenocarcinoma in situ, or extension of disease into the
endocervical canal makes a laser, loop, or cold-knife conization mandatory.
The choice of treatment will also depend on several patient factors including
age, desire to preserve fertility, and medical condition. Most importantly, the
extent of disease must be known.
In selected cases, the outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure
(LEEP) may be an acceptable alternative to cold-knife conization. This quickly
performed in-office procedure requires only local anesthesia and obviates the
risks associated with general anesthesia for cold-knife conization.[2,3]
However, controversy exists as to the adequacy of LEEP as a replacement for
conization.[4] A trial comparing LEEP with cold-knife cone biopsy showed no
difference in the likelihood of complete excision of dysplasia.[5] However, two
case reports suggested that the use of LEEP in patients with occult invasive
cancer led to an inability to accurately determine depth of invasion when a
focus of the cancer was transected.[6]
Standard treatment options:
Methods to treat ectocervical lesions include:
- LEEP.[7,8]
- Laser therapy.[9]
- Conization.
- Cryotherapy.[10]
When the endocervical canal is involved, laser or cold-knife conization may be
used for selected patients to preserve the uterus and avoid radiation therapy
and/or more extensive surgery.
Total abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy is an accepted therapy for the
postreproductive age group and is particularly indicated when the neoplastic
process extends to the inner cone margin. For medically inoperable patients, a
single intracavitary insertion with tandem and ovoids for 5,000 mg hours
(80 Gy vaginal surface dose) may be used.[11]
Current Clinical Trials
Check for U.S. clinical trials from NCI's PDQ Cancer Clinical Trials Registry that are now accepting patients with stage 0 cervical cancer. The list of clinical trials can be further narrowed by location, drug, intervention, and other criteria.
General information about clinical trials is also available from the NCI Web site.
References
-
Shumsky AG, Stuart GC, Nation J: Carcinoma of the cervix following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 53 (1): 50-4, 1994.
[PUBMED Abstract]
-
Wright TC Jr, Gagnon S, Richart RM, et al.: Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using the loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol 79 (2): 173-8, 1992.
[PUBMED Abstract]
-
Naumann RW, Bell MC, Alvarez RD, et al.: LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold-knife conization. Gynecol Oncol 55 (2): 224-8, 1994.
[PUBMED Abstract]
-
Widrich T, Kennedy AW, Myers TM, et al.: Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: management and outcome. Gynecol Oncol 61 (3): 304-8, 1996.
[PUBMED Abstract]
-
Girardi F, Heydarfadai M, Koroschetz F, et al.: Cold-knife conization versus loop excision: histopathologic and clinical results of a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 55 (3 Pt 1): 368-70, 1994.
[PUBMED Abstract]
-
Eddy GL, Spiegel GW, Creasman WT: Adverse effect of electrosurgical loop excision on assignment of FIGO stage in cervical cancer: report of two cases. Gynecol Oncol 55 (2): 313-7, 1994.
[PUBMED Abstract]
-
Wright VC, Chapman W: Intraepithelial neoplasia of the lower female genital tract: etiology, investigation, and management. Semin Surg Oncol 8 (4): 180-90, 1992 Jul-Aug.
[PUBMED Abstract]
-
Bloss JD: The use of electrosurgical techniques in the management of premalignant diseases of the vulva, vagina, and cervix: an excisional rather than an ablative approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169 (5): 1081-5, 1993.
[PUBMED Abstract]
-
Tsukamoto N: Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with the carbon dioxide laser. Gynecol Oncol 21 (3): 331-6, 1985.
[PUBMED Abstract]
-
Benedet JL, Miller DM, Nickerson KG, et al.: The results of cryosurgical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia at one, five, and ten years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157 (2): 268-73, 1987.
[PUBMED Abstract]
-
Grigsby PW, Perez CA: Radiotherapy alone for medically inoperable carcinoma of the cervix: stage IA and carcinoma in situ. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21 (2): 375-8, 1991.
[PUBMED Abstract]
Back to Top
< Previous Section | Next Section > |