 |
Table 2-5
Top 20 Container Ports: Throughput 1998
Excel | CSV
| 1 |
Singapore |
15,100,000 |
| 2 |
Hong Kong |
14,582,000 |
| 3 |
Kaohsiung |
6,271,053 |
| 4 |
Rotterdam |
6,010,000 |
| 5 |
Pusan |
5,752,955 |
| 6 |
Long Beach |
4,100,000 |
| 7 |
Hamburg |
3,546,940 |
| 8 |
Los Angeles |
3,378,218 |
| 9 |
Antwerp |
3,265,000 |
| 10 |
Shanghai |
3,000,000 |
| 11 |
Dubai |
2,804,104 |
| 12 |
Tokyo |
2,495,000 |
| 13 |
New York/New Jersey |
2,465,993 |
| 14 |
Felixstowe |
2,461,823 |
| 15 (tie) |
Gioia Tauro |
2,100,000 |
| Kobe |
2,100,000 |
| 17 |
Yokohoma |
2,091,240 |
| 18 |
San Juan |
1,990,272 |
| 19 |
Manila |
1,856,372 |
| 20 |
Algreciras |
1,825,614 |
Source: K.C. Sjetnan, 1999, Cargo Systems, The Future of the
Container Shipping Industry (London: IIR Publications, Ltd.).
|
|
