![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090513044538im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
Table 3-20: Incoming Rail Container (Full) Crossings,
U.S.-Canadian Border
Excel | CSV
Alaska |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Idaho |
33,623 |
39,872 |
47,263 |
54,593 |
60,502 |
Maine |
23,324 |
31,210 |
28,139 |
27,790 |
17,417 |
Michigan |
433,779 |
459,213 |
528,096 |
585,589 |
571,046 |
Minnesota |
175,229 |
210,011 |
204,386 |
222,443 |
258,710 |
Montana |
17,824 |
17,595 |
15,964 |
16,367 |
17,707 |
New York |
105,854 |
190,227 |
192,614 |
207,574 |
204,948 |
North Dakota |
20,087 |
102,225 |
112,462 |
111,601 |
129,506 |
Vermont |
33,122 |
34,857 |
37,745 |
32,968 |
42,567 |
Washington |
60,742 |
65,726 |
48,770 |
72,457 |
83,740 |
United States, total |
903,584 |
1,150,936 |
1,215,439 |
1,331,382 |
1,386,143 |
KEY: NA = not applicable.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, special tabulation, June 2003. Based on the following primary data source: U.S. Department of Treasury, U.S. Customs Service, Office of Field Operations, Operations Management Database.
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090513044538im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |