 |
|
|
|
TABLE 1-28c: Condition of Rail Transit
Infrastructure
(Percent)
Excel | CSV
| Stations |
|
|
|
|
|
| Excellent |
14 |
11 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
| Good |
47 |
46 |
33 |
22 |
28 |
| Adequate |
12 |
15 |
50 |
18 |
14 |
| Substandard |
12 |
13 |
16 |
26 |
51 |
| Poor |
15 |
15 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
| Communication
Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
| Excellent |
N |
0 |
0 |
7 |
12 |
| Good |
N |
61 |
62 |
69 |
63 |
| Adequate |
N |
16 |
12 |
10 |
25 |
| Substandard |
N |
12 |
14 |
6 |
0 |
| Poor |
N |
10 |
12 |
8 |
0 |
| Train
Control Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
| Excellent |
N |
9 |
7 |
6 |
0 |
| Good |
N |
52 |
56 |
66 |
45 |
| Adequate |
N |
16 |
17 |
11 |
29 |
| Substandard |
N |
11 |
10 |
10 |
14 |
| Poor |
N |
13 |
10 |
8 |
12 |
| Traction
Power Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
| Excellent |
N |
25 |
21 |
37 |
8 |
| Good |
N |
44 |
55 |
45 |
47 |
| Adequate |
N |
10 |
11 |
11 |
45 |
| Substandard |
N |
14 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
| Poor |
N |
7 |
7 |
4 |
0 |
| Revenue
Collection Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
| Excellent |
N |
27 |
30 |
34 |
26 |
| Good |
N |
33 |
31 |
56 |
54 |
| Adequate |
N |
18 |
18 |
2 |
10 |
| Substandard |
N |
10 |
18 |
7 |
8 |
| Poor |
N |
12 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
| Elevated
structures |
|
|
|
|
|
| Excellent |
1 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
| Good |
56 |
59 |
59 |
83 |
77 |
| Adequate |
16 |
12 |
16 |
3 |
4 |
| Substandard |
20 |
29 |
22 |
7 |
14 |
| Poor |
7 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
| Underground
tunnels |
|
|
|
|
|
| Excellent |
9 |
7 |
12 |
40 |
26 |
| Good |
59 |
47 |
46 |
34 |
48 |
| Adequate |
13 |
18 |
19 |
12 |
12 |
| Substandard |
11 |
19 |
11 |
9 |
6 |
| Poor |
7 |
9 |
12 |
6 |
7 |
KEY: N = data do not exist.
NOTE
Percents may
not add to 100 due to rounding.
SOURCE
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit
Administration, Transit Economic Requirements Model.
|
|
|
|
|
