|
Table 3-11
Port State Control Statistics by Port
Excel | CSV
Anchorage, Alaska |
17 |
124 |
0 |
85 |
0 |
Baltimore, Maryland |
5 |
206 |
0 |
227 |
0 |
Boston, Massachusetts |
1 |
168 |
1 |
66 |
0 |
Buffalo,
New York |
9 |
52 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
Charleston, South Carolina |
7 |
142 |
2 |
139 |
0 |
Chicago,
Illinois |
9 |
17 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
Cleveland, Ohio |
9 |
32 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
Corpus Christi, Texas |
8 |
340 |
3 |
380 |
0 |
Detroit,
Michigan |
9 |
33 |
0 |
20 |
1 |
Duluth,
Minnesota |
9 |
28 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
Guam |
14 |
72 |
0 |
54 |
0 |
Hampton Roads, Virginia |
5 |
200 |
4 |
284 |
1 |
Honolulu,
Hawaii |
14 |
230 |
5 |
169 |
0 |
Houston, Texas |
8 |
1,012 |
14 |
952 |
4 |
Jacksonville, Florida |
7 |
284 |
6 |
255 |
1 |
Juneau, Alaska |
17 |
30 |
0 |
43 |
0 |
Los Angeles, California |
11 |
709 |
6 |
858 |
7 |
Miami, Florida |
7 |
388 |
8 |
312 |
2 |
Milwaukee, Wisconsin |
9 |
34 |
0 |
26 |
0 |
Mobile, Alabama |
8 |
311 |
1 |
211 |
1 |
Morgan City, Louisiana |
8 |
124 |
5 |
58 |
1 |
New
Haven, Connecticut |
1 |
88 |
0 |
70 |
0 |
New
Orleans, Louisiana |
8 |
1,189 |
9 |
992 |
8 |
New
York, New York |
1 |
810 |
4 |
743 |
1 |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
5 |
399 |
3 |
461 |
0 |
Port
Arthur, Texas |
8 |
296 |
1 |
233 |
0 |
Portland, Maine |
1 |
114 |
1 |
94 |
0 |
Portland,
Oregon |
13 |
422 |
4 |
302 |
0 |
Providence, Rhode Island |
1 |
104 |
1 |
50 |
0 |
San
Diego, California |
11 |
117 |
1 |
103 |
0 |
San Francisco, California |
11 |
305 |
9 |
349 |
3 |
San
Juan, Puerto Rico |
7 |
511 |
2 |
366 |
1 |
Savannah, Georgia |
7 |
241 |
5 |
353 |
1 |
Seattle, Washington |
13 |
392 |
12 |
391 |
0 |
Tampa, Florida |
7 |
492 |
1 |
216 |
3 |
Toledo, Ohio |
9 |
21 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
Valdez, Alaska |
17 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Wilmington, North Carolina |
5 |
96 |
2 |
95 |
0 |
Total |
|
10,136 |
110 |
9,053 |
35 |
NOTES: In 2006, New Orleans, Houston, and New York were the leading ports in the number of safety and security examinations. However, Houston, Seattle, New Orleans, and San Francisco were the leading ports for safety-related detentions. New Orleans, Los Angeles, and Houston were the leading ports of Major Control Actions (MCAs), which occur when a vessel is detained, denial of entry, or expelled for violating International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) or Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (MTSA).
SOURCE: Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard, Port State Control in the United States, Annual Report 2006.
|
|