![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090511040543im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090511040543im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090511040543im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090511040543im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
Figure 1
Percentage of City-Pairs with Lengthened Schedules by Intercity Passenger Mode and Service Type,
February 1995 to February 2002
Excel |
CSV |
Table Version
![Figure 1 - Percentage of City-Pairs with Lengthened Schedules by Intercity Passenger Mode and Service Type, February 1995 to February 2002. If you are a user with a disability and cannot view this image, please call 800-853-1351 or email answers@bts.gov for further assistance.](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090511040543im_/https://www.bts.gov/publications/issue_briefs/number_07/images/figure_01.gif)
NOTE: Only air city-pairs with direct service were considered in this
analysis. See methodology notes on page 4 for more details.
SOURCES: Amtrak, National, Northeast and Schedule Change
Timetables, various issues, (Washington, DC);Russell’s Guides, Official
National Motor Coach Guide, January 1985 and January 2002 (Cedar Rapids, Iowa);
Greyhound Lines, System Timetable, January 1985 (Dallas, Texas); Official
Airline Guide, February 1995 and 2002.
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090511040543im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090511040543im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090511040543im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090511040543im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |