![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510125326im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510125326im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510125326im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510125326im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
TABLE 3. Top 3 Destination and Origin Ports for International Waterborne Freight via Port of Houston, 2003
(Short tons, thousands)
Excel | CSV
1 |
Tuxpan,
Mexico |
2,360 |
2 |
Antwerp,
Belgium |
1,472 |
3 |
Veracruz,
Mexico |
1,404 |
|
1 |
Cayo Arcas, Mexico |
9,444 |
2 |
Dos Bocas, Mexico |
6,276 |
3 |
Carmen, Mexico |
5,012 |
|
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, based on data from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, preliminary 2003 Foreign Cargo Data, October 2004.
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510125326im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510125326im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510125326im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090510125326im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |