Appendix Table F,,,,,,,,,,
"Growth of Trucking MFP, Estimated by the Two Methods ",,,,,,,,,,
(without land),,,,,,,,,,
Year,Percentage Rate of Change,,,,,,,,,
,Basic growth accounting methodology,Tornqvist methodology,Difference [(1)-(2)],,,,,,,
,       '(1),       '(2),       '(3),,,,,,,
1988,7.7 ,8.6,(0.9),,,,,,,
1989,1.0 ,1.0,(0.0),,,,,,,
1990,0.6 ,1.0,(0.4),,,,,,,
1991,4.1 ,4.2,(0.1),,,,,,,
1992,3.8 ,3.9,(0.1),,,,,,,
1993,0.7 ,0.7,0.0 ,,,,,,,
1994,0.6 ,0.5,0.1 ,,,,,,,
1995,(2.3),-2.2,(0.1),,,,,,,
1996,0.2 ,0.2,(0.0),,,,,,,
1997,(0.2),-0.2,(0.0),,,,,,,
1998,(0.4),-0.4,(0.1),,,
1999,(1.3),-1.2,(0.2),,,
2000,(0.6),-0.5,(0.0),,,
2001,(2.5),-2.4,(0.0),,,
2002,1.4 ,1.4,(0.0),,,
2003,0.4 ,0.7,(0.3),,,
"Notes and Sources: The MFP numbers in column 1 are from Table 2, and are based on the basic growth-accounting methodology, without land. The MFP estimates in column 2 are from Table 3, and are based on the Tornqvist methodology, without land.  ",,,,,,



,,,,,,
,,,,,,