PATENTS   
Patents > Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy > Office of Patent Legal Administration > Proposed Rule Changes to Focus the Patent Process in the 21st Century > The State of the Patent System Background For Rule Proposals (text version)

THE STATE OF THE PATENT SYSTEM BACKGROUND FOR RULE PROPOSALS

Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington and the West” Conference January 25, 2006

UPR Applications Filed

FY 05 plan 375,080 (5.5% above FY 04)

FY 05 actual 384,228 (8.1% above FY04)
2.6% over plan
Year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Numbers 221,304 191,116 220,773 240,090 261,041 293,244 326,081 333,688 333,452 355,527 383,000

TC Application Inventory

  1600 1700 2100 2600 2800 3600 3700 Total* Design
New Applications1 9/30/2004 55,402 63,923 71,778 97,380 77,651 56,738 65,005 508,878 18,451
New Applications 1 9/30/2005 62,644 72,697 76,529 115,585 94,425 70,354 83,225 586,580 24,534
1 “New Application inventory” is the number of new applications designated or assigned to a technology center awaiting a first action. *Total inventory includes applications not assigned to a particular TC, awaiting processing either pre- or post-examination.

Patent Pendency (as of 1/1/2006)

Technology Center Average 1st Action Pendency (months)1 Average Total Pendency (months)2
1600-Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry 23.3 33.5
1700- Chemical and Materials Engineering 20.6 29.8

2100-Computer Architecture Software and Information Security

33.1 44.8
2600-Communications 31.2

43.9

2800-Semiconductor, Electrical, Optical Systems 15.0 25.0
3600-Transportation, Construction, Electronic Commerce 19.8 27.5
3700-Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing Products 18.6 26.6
UPR Total as of (10/01/2005) 21.8 30.6
1 “Average 1st action pendency” is the average age from filing to first action for a newly filed application, completed during October-December 2005. 2 “Average total pendency” is the average age from filing to issue or abandonment of a newly filed application, completed during October-December 2005.

First Action Pendency by Art Areas

High Pendency Art Areas Pendency1 (months) Low Pendency Art Areas Pendency (months)

1640-Immunology, Receptor/Ligands, Cytokines, Recombinant Hormones, and Molecular Biology

27.7 1620-Heterocyclic Compounds and Uses 16.9
1743-Analytic Chemistry & Wave Energy 30.8 1752-Radiation Imagery 12.1
2123-Simulation and Modeling, Emulation of Computer Components 39.7 2125-Manufacturing Control Systems and Chemical/Mechanical/Electrical Control 20.00
2617-Interactive Video Distribution 50.4 2651-Dynamic Information Storage & Retrieval 16.1
2836-Control Circuits 24.3 2833-Electrical Connectors 8.8
3628-Finance & Banking, Accounting 52.1 3612-Land Vehicles 12.0
3731-Surgery: Cutting, Clamping, Suturing 30.9 3723-Tools & Metal Working 10.9
1 “Average 1st action pendency” is the average age from filing to first action for a newly filed application, completed during October-December 2005.

Inventory by Art Examples

High Inventory Art Areas Months of Inventory* Low Inventory Art Areas Months of Inventory*
1614, 1615, and 1617-Drugs Bio-affecting and Body Treatment 38-51 1620-Organic Chemistry 15
1753-Radiation Imagery 34 1734-Adhesive Bonding and Coating Apparatus 10
2127-Computer Task Management 46 2125-Manufacturing Control Systems and Chemical/Mechanical/Electrical Control 10
2611-Interactive Video Distribution 114 2651,2653-Information Storage and Retrieval 12
2836-Control Circuits 22 2831-Electrical Conductors 8
3620-Business Methods 22-136 3651-Conveying 12
3731 and 3737-Medical Instruments, Diagnostic Equipment 38-47 3742-Thermal and Combustion Technology 8
*The number of months it would take to reach a first action on the merits (e.g., an action addressing patentability issues) on a new application filed in July 2005 at today’s production rate. Today’s production rate means that there are no changes in production due to hiring, attrition, changes to examination processing or examination efficiencies, and that applications are taken up in the order of filing in the given art unit/area. Of course, USPTO is taking aggressive steps to ensure changes that will significantly lower the inventory rates in high-inventory art areas.

Quality of Products – FY 05

  FY 04 1600 1700 2100 2600 2800 3600 3700 Design FY05 FY05 Target
Patent In-Process Examination Compliance Rate1* 82.0% 81.7% 82.9% 84.7% 90.9% 84.4% 86.6% 94.3% 86.2% 86.2% 84.0%
Patent Allowance Error Rate2* 5.32% 4.88% 6.46% 3.56% 2.25% 4.43% 4.9.4% 6.43% 1.6% 4.55% 4.0%

*Compliance and error rates as measured by OPQA.
1 Compliance is the percent of office actions reviewed and found to be free of any in-process examination deficiency (an error that has significant adverse impact on patent prosecution).
2 Patent allowance error rate is the percent of allowed applications reviewed having at least one claim which is considered unpatentable on a basis for which a court would hold a patent invalid. “Allowance” occurs before a patent is issued, so these errors are caught before any patent is actually granted.

Technology Centers Rework* Statistics

  FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
TC Summary % FAOM Rework % FAOM Rework % FAOM Rework % FAOM Rework
1600 36.4% 39.7% 40.3% 42.4%
1700 25.2% 26.9% 27.1% 28.0%
2100 23.9% 24.0% 24.6% 28.2%
2600 24.8% 24.1% 24.3% 25.4%
2800 19.1% 22.0% 24.9% 24.1%
3600 17.7% 21.2% 23.1% 28.5%
3700 22.2% 25.1% 24.0% 28.1%
UPR 23.2% 25.3% 26.1% 28.3%

* Rework first actions are those actions that are in a Continuing (CONs and CIPs), RCE, CPA or 129(a) applications (excludes Divisionals).

Continuation Filing Rates

Fiscal Year FY80 FY81 FY82 FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05
Continuations (CON, CPA/RCE) 6,022 6764 9097 6764 9509 11882 14036 15466 16923 19184 19962 22346 26086 28067 31750 39175 28751 32410 33833 39446 49978 56492 60443 68087 73948 84250
CIPs 8,192 5743 5871 5023 5903 6648 7383 7745 8432 9282 10222 10980 11968 12690 13753 15881 10500 10914 11288 12257 13764 14472 14399 14533 14929 15378

Continuation Filing Percentage

Fiscal Year FY80 FY82 FY84 FY86 FY88 FY90 FY92 FY94 FY96 FY98 FY00 FY02 FY04
% Continuations (CON, CPA/RCE) of Total Filings 6.42% 7.79% 8.68% 11.54% 12.35% 12.20% 15.12% 17.06% 15.05% 14.09% 17.04% 18.11% 20.80%

Alternative: Appeal

  FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05
Inventory Reduction Measure 11.8 7.7 6 3.5 3.8
Time to Renew from Docketing     14.5 9.9 4.8

Appeal Conference Initiatives

  • Pre-Brief Appeal Conference Pilot Program
    • 1296 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 67 (July 12, 2005)
    • The USPTO is extending the program until further notice.
  • Appeal Conferee Specialists Pilot Program

Average Number of Claims at Filing

Rule Makings on Representative Claims and Continuing Applications

  • Rule Makings on Representative Claims and Continuing Applications
    • Better focused examination – help us get it right the first time
    • Create greater finality in examination:
      • To help the Office turn to new inventions and create public certainty on patent protection

Pendency Reduction Action Plan

KEY: e Biz=online business system fees=fees forms=formshelp=help laws and regs=laws/regulations definition=definition (glossary)

The Inventors Assistance Center is available to help you on patent matters.Send questions about USPTO programs and services to the USPTO Contact Center (UCC). You can suggest USPTO webpages or material you would like featured on this section by E-mail to the webmaster@uspto.gov. While we cannot promise to accommodate all requests, your suggestions will be considered and may lead to other improvements on the website.


|.HOME | SITE INDEX| SEARCH | eBUSINESS | HELP | PRIVACY POLICY